贾冰被断章取义,郭德纲唱了二十几年的包袱被有心举报,这个时代只会越来越疯。只要他们想,随时随地都可以重新复刻一次文革 2.0,但这个时代不同的是,新时代红卫兵可以因为网络快速集结,但还会独立思考的人也会因为网络意识到自己并不是在孤军奋战。 #做人这件事很容易被放弃但也最难被放弃

Channel
♾️莫比乌斯环世界♾️
@onojyunblog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
389subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001811943930 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onojyunblog |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onojyunblog |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 389 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 386 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 383 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 383 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 25.0% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🆕 博客更新:《现在几点?》 📍 阅读全文:https://mobius.blog/25356.html
我最近在帮别人改剧本,改着改着,觉得自己就像是剧本界的“勇哥”。 比如最近的一个本子,主创团队想用 AI 制作一个架空三国的超现实作品。本子设定在遥远的未来,构想很棒。但他们试图在视觉上制造更多爆点,比如曹操手持机关枪、诸葛亮操控激光束等。我便问他们:你们到底想追求视觉上的刺激,还是把故事讲明白?尤其是关于未来社会的哲学设定?他们觉得两者都应兼顾,但我建议,视觉与思考对人类而言本身就是一种冲突,过度的视觉刺激必然导致思考暂时下线。所以电影里要设定节奏极慢、充满对白的“呼吸点”,就像爆炸必须有慢动作画面一样,让所有感官在这一刻被调动——因为接下来,观众必须做好心理准备,最危机的时刻就要开始了。 我并非认为 AI 制作那些超现实画面“不好”,而是这些画面太过细腻,以至于观众在观看过程中可能是在追求多巴胺的“爽”刺激,而非对故事的基本理解。更何况,这还是一个需要耗费更多脑力去理解的故事背景。既然设定已是高概念故事,而非现实世界中人…
🆕 博客更新:《污染源》 📍 阅读全文:https://mobius.blog/25346.html
经历了大半年,这个有趣的观察可以得出结论了。 因为我几乎每天都会遛狗两次,所以也就熟悉了小区里各式各样的人。 一般来说,每年年初,特别是春节之后,小区里会突然涌现出一大批开始跑步健身的人。这种热潮持续时间通常在一周左右,最长的能到第三周;第二个峰值出现在 4 月初,即数值上的“第二季度”,这个区间大家坚持跑步的时间要稍长一些,估计是因为天气更舒适;再下一个高峰是 7 月初的暑假,但持续时间一般只有一周左右;冬天跑步的人很少,但在 12 月底会出现一个奇妙的小高峰,并在 1 月中旬结束,颇有些“辞旧迎新却又不知迎新到何处”的意味。 而跑步这件事本身,往往伴随着强烈的“使命感”。就像为了夏天的身材做准备时,一般从 4 月开始就会迎来一波健身高峰期。这段时间,你会听到身边很多人都在以各种方式减脂减重。大家虽未约定,但看到他人都在这样做,便不由自主地认为自己是否也该如此。跑步的“见证感”会更强,甚至滋生出微妙的竞争关系。而且极易出…
🆕 博客更新:《事儿逼提喻法》 📍 阅读全文:https://mobius.blog/25339.html
👍1
截止日前的年度最喜欢电影:《奥德赛》、《挽救计划》、《痴迷》。 《奥德赛》目前我没办法写影评,我现在说什么都得是嫉妒诺兰这个老混蛋。他用了一套只有他能打的打法,讽刺和击败了所有的编剧和导演。比如导演和观众们开始接受用 AI 做电影的时候,他在电影里竟然让女巫喀耳刻徒手搓的方式,把角色变成被诅咒的猪。真的只有看诺兰的镜头语言,才会感受到观众视角里的那种一脚踏空的瞬间失重感。 点映后听到很多人在聊天,说明明是抱着来看荷兰弟的期待来的,看完了觉得没看懂、荷兰弟的戏份也太少了。 这部电影的评价一定是极端两极的,但这不就是诺兰存在的意义么。
👍1
看了《奥德赛》的点映,多半是一部要被“骂”的电影,但很高兴诺兰终于拍了他最想拍的电影。用完全不超现实的方式,拍了一部原本属于超现实的希腊神话故事,而且命题是我最爱的“宿命论”。骂他的多半也会因为对标《星际穿越》和《天能》的超现实表达。我真的好爱“塞壬”的那一段,一个原本应该用画面交代塞壬的歌声给人带来了怎样的幻想,甚至连美人鱼的近景都没有,他居然用主角的对白来解释发生了什么,太他妈高级了!没有一个导演会愿意放过这个部分的特效表达的,但,诺兰就是用对白。 #最高级的电影是用最简单的命题讲最简单的故事
❤3
≡ 007|这一周莫比乌斯环转到了哪里? ———————————— 🧠 有些想在最前面聊聊的闲白~ 这段时间,无独有偶地都和几个朋友聊到了“熟悉感”这件事。 我大学就是自己搬出去租房子住了之后,一瞬间,不知道为什么约炮的心思荡然无存,我还以为我怎么了,后来才知道是因为我把那个空间当成“家”了。 其实这个话题从《写在 2026 年新年之前》就以经备好了: 人的大脑是可以被「驯化」的,它能够很快的适应「熟悉」,在一个长期居住的房子里,你几乎可以闭着眼睛在房间里拿到你想拿到的东西。但就是因为这种熟悉,让人们也失去了好奇心,但也是因为这种熟悉感,人们才会为家里的某一处出现玻璃碎裂的声音,而被调动所有的感官、甚至是刺激与兴奋…… 我现在会越来越喜欢为自己的生活制造“意外”,否则我能感知到自己的思考和写作都会围绕着一个死循环进行。哪怕是小区的一棵树倒了,对我来说都是一则灵感,更别说我坐在咖啡厅,用 AirPods 的通透模式“…
🆕 博客更新:《宝可梦能够被神圣化吗?》 📍 阅读全文:https://mobius.blog/25310.html
我老婆居然没有看过《惊声尖笑》系列,我赶紧推荐她去重新学习这个系列。这种大麻电影的经典不是在于它无厘头,而是在于它是在用解构的方式破坏了人们对于惊悚片,以及那些被奉为神作的惊悚片进行一次毁灭性的结构。正好就是我这两天在博客提到的“神圣与世俗”的对立关系。 这种解构几乎是把那些被奉为神作的电影进行了一次彻底世俗化的结构,所以《惊声尖笑》里有大量的地狱笑话、种族歧视、性别歧视、脏话、讽刺、脱口秀式的政治羞讽,这些都是把神圣化拖入世俗化最有效,也是完全无法逆转的方法。 但并不是每个人惧怕嘲讽这件事,前提是这个人被捧上了神坛,并认为自己就是神的时候,才会如此惧怕被世俗化。 #解构的魔力
🆕 博客更新:《套皮》 📍 阅读全文:https://mobius.blog/25302.html
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @onojyunblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“♾️莫比乌斯环世界♾️” (@onojyunblog), 389 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onojyunblog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.