Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

only thoughts

@onlythoughtsof

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

123subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002398242034
TypeChannel
Username@onlythoughtsof
Created8 February 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/onlythoughtsof

Growth

123124123.57 Aug 2026, 23:03 — 124 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 20:54 — 123 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 03:17 — 123 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:039 Aug 2026, 03:17
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 123–124 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 03:17123no change
8 Aug 2026, 20:54123-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:03124first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 8 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

170 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54293923134932425886638.8%
custom 52671089928485208014727.6%
custom 52695271453355106733319.4%
custom 5269321257488240429158.82%
custom 526926905216075710474.12%
custom 526715390532152858421.18%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 170reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2025 to 14 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jul 2025, 09:50 UTC≈1,000 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

❔КЛАССНЫЕ СПОСОБЫ ПЕРСОНАЛИЗАЦИИ ЧАТА❔ Персонализация - один из ответов на вопросы "А как же нашей модели выделиться на фоне остальных? Как создать ту самую "уникальность", о которой вокруг столько разговоров?" Без воды приведу несколько примеров 😊 Персонализация описаний и добивок в секстинге: ⚙️Бро заявляет, что любит гольф. Узнаём его любимого игрока, а затем после ппв с блоуджобом/райдингом можно кидать добив

custom 542939231349324258813custom 52695271453355106738custom 52671089928485208017

14 Jul 2025, 09:47 UTC650 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Пост сломался, паблик закрывается

custom 52692690521607571046

13 Jul 2025, 18:59 UTC620 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А ПОМНИТЕ БЫЛ ТАКОЙ ПАБЛИК ONLYTHOUGHTS? Нет, это не закат карьеры, скорее её стремительный взлёт 🚀 Переквалифицировался с работы чаттером/старшим чаттером на позицию тимлида 3 (почти уже 4) анкет. Без мам, пап и агентств, работаем с моделями напрямую 5 последних месяцев был участником лютой мясорубки из изменений, взлётов и падений. Тимлидил в одном агентстве, затем совсем немного делал то же самое в другом, но с

custom 542939231349324258814custom 52671089928485208016custom 52695271453355106734

23 Feb 2025, 08:28 UTC737 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Как сделать работу чаттера кайфовой даже в не самые простые времена?🤕 🧛‍♂️ Меняйте майндсет, если ещё нет В большинстве случаев чат с фаном - это работа в долгую. Если вы работаете не на анкете, где делают рассылки в духе, "Let's fuck sex pussy, huh?", то у вас всё хорошо и структура диалога обычно выглядит следующим образом: Знакомство - привязка - презентация - продажа Не бойтесь задерживаться на первых двух эт

custom 526710899284852080112custom 54293923134932425885custom 52695271453355106733custom 52692690521607571041

17 Feb 2025, 16:27 UTC556 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Привет, ребята😍 Влив в рабочие процессы прошёл успешно, так что... Какой пост хочется больше?

  1. 🎛Пост о том, как сделать работу чаттера действительно кайфовой даже в не самые простые времена🎛60%
  2. 🎛Моё ультраважное мнение по поводу того, как работать в команде🎛7%
  3. 🎛Пост про концентрацию и слияние с образом модели🎛4%
  4. 🎛Немного про разницу между работой с высоким и низким активом🎛29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 54293923134932425887custom 52695271453355106733custom 52671089928485208012

11 Feb 2025, 13:27 UTC573 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Рандомные кейсы, как и обещал: 🧛‍♂️Ролплей God of War 🧛‍♂️Продолжение криптосекстинга 🧛‍♂️2 автомеханика на смене сцепились в яме 🧛‍♂️Ролплей Elden Ring Вас тут уже целых 50 человек!❤️‍🔥 Расскажите друзьям и знакомым о том, что здесь происходит, и тогда это определенно будет происходить ещё чаще upd: в комментариях оставил кейсы со 2 и 4 скрина с переводом

custom 542939231349324258814custom 52695271453355106737custom 52671089928485208015

10 Feb 2025, 16:48 UTC530 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Кейсы тоже будут, оставайтесь на линии🤯

custom 52671089928485208016custom 54293923134932425885custom 52693212574882404294

10 Feb 2025, 16:48 UTC586 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Гости уже на пороге, и вы не знаете, чем их удивить? Попробуйте показать им необычные секстинги и доказать их эффективность! 😫 Ни для кого не секрет, что за внимание мемберов ведётся ожесточенная борьба. Важно выделяться, но КАК ЖЕ ЭТО СДЕЛАТЬ? Лично я выбрал тернистый путь детализированных фантазий и полного погружения... Что вообще представляет из себя необычный секстинг? Всё предельно просто! Вы общаетесь с фан

custom 526932125748824042911custom 52671089928485208018custom 54293923134932425885

8 Feb 2025, 18:04 UTC457 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Привет👍 Меня зовут Толя, тут я буду постить свои мысли по поводу адулт-движухи. Возникает справедливый вопрос. Ты кто? Сейчас я работаю чаттером в лучшем агентстве на планете Земля - Rule 34💖 В работе мне помогают нестандартные подходы, я сторонник тщательной и глубокой проработки каждого фана на странице. Здесь я хочу делиться своими мыслями, постараюсь помочь вам найти индивидуальный подход к каждому мемберу, ра

custom 52695271453355106738custom 54293923134932425883custom 52671539053215285842custom 52671089928485208011

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @onlythoughtsof. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Feb 2025, 16:27 UTCAnonymous Poll45 voters

Привет, ребята😍 Влив в рабочие процессы прошёл успешно, так что... Какой пост хочется больше?

  1. 🎛Пост о том, как сделать работу чаттера действительно кайфовой даже в не самые простые времена🎛60%
  2. 🎛Моё ультраважное мнение по поводу того, как работать в команде🎛7%
  3. 🎛Пост про концентрацию и слияние с образом модели🎛4%
  4. 🎛Немного про разницу между работой с высоким и низким активом🎛29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2025 to 14 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 816,508 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“only thoughts” (@onlythoughtsof), 123 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onlythoughtsof.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.