Channel
@onlyfanfelix
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
94subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002871972195 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onlyfanfelix |
| Description | Гайды на фарм гем протокола Felix (by @defihopes) |
| Created | 4 July 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onlyfanfelix |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 94 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:21 | 94 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 4 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
27 reactions across 10 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 27 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2025 to 15 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Про % на дроп Стоимость поинта в случае Felix расчитываяется исходя из 3х переменных: 1. Процент от общего supply токенов, выделенные на дроп 2. FDV проекта (total_supply*token_price) 3. Общее количество распределенных поинтов В этом посте размышляю о п.1 Посмотрим на других. Так уж вышло, что на первый дроп лендинг протоколы как правило выделяют 1-2-3% от supply. Происходит это по следующим причинам: 1. жаднос…
👍5
У меня ETH Да, друг, ты наверняка натерпелся. И тут не без приключений будет. На самом Felix нет мани маркета под ETH (пока что), поэтому придется поискать где под залог ETH взять что-то, что можно использовать в Felix, я лично не хочу усложнять и давай возьмем стейблы. Где это можно сделать: – AAVE. Самый простой вариант взять на AAVE и потом завести USDC на Hyperliquid. Знакомо, понятно, надежно; – HyperLend. Ан…
👍3
У меня HYPE С HYPE можно делать все что и с BTC, поэтому см. пост «У меня BTC» Нюансы работы с займом через HYPE: – HYPE сильно волотильнее, поэтому Health Factor лучше брать в районе 1.8; – Маркеты с HYPE имеют меньше LTV (62.5%-65%), это значит что ты сможешь взять займ меньше чем за BTC (75%), отсюда эффективность будет ниже. ---------------------------- Вернуться к навигации →→ ----------------------------
👍2
У меня BTC Прекрасно, поздравляю просто за наличие BTC в портфеле. Теперь поздравляю за то, что на BTC можно гуд фармить Felix через займ (а за займы Felix любит давать поинты). Тут как и со стейблами у нас две дорожки: займ через CDP (feUSD) и займ через Vanilla Markets (USDT0 / USDhl / USDe). Займ через CDP (feUSD) ↳ usefelix.xyz/borrow Step by step: 1. Идем на в раздел CDP/Borrow → нажимаем «Borrow» напротив UB…
👍1
У меня стейблы Если у тебя просто так лежат стейблы, то можешь их использовать в Stability Pool и Vanilla Markets Lend. Stability Pool ↳ usefelix.xyz/earn В этот пул депозитится (кнопка «Depisit») feUSD (можно купить на самом Hyperliquid Spot и отправить в HyperEVM), на который приходит два вида доходности: комиссии протокола (1) и ликвидации (2). Если с простым APY все понятно, там капает 8%-24% годовых в зависим…
👍3
Как завести средства на Hyperliquid Единственный адекватный вариант взаимодействия с HyperEVM это использовать браузерный кошелек Rabby.io – там все готово и удобно. Metamask уже как пару лет никому не советую, но если уж только он у тебя и лень менять, то добавляй HyperEVM через ChainList (link →) Step by step: 1. Заходим на сайт Hyperliquid и подключаем кошелек; 2. Нажимаем «Deposit» в верхнем правом углу → Выбира…
👍2
DefiHopes: гайды на Felix pinned a photo
Hello, world! Тут буду собирать инфо по фарму Felix 🕊Почему Felix это гем писал ранее в канале вот тут → 🕊Cтрим по Felix в @hyperliquid_ru С Женей (@chipida) и Колей (@cryptophilos). Можно посмотреть на youtube тут → --------------------- 📏Моя рефка: 📏https://www.usefelix.xyz?ref=AD3D82E1 --------------------- # Навигация ## База. ↳ Как завести $$$ на Hyperliquid → ## Почитать ↳ Про % на дроп ## Пр…
👍2
....
👍3
....
👍3
....
👍3
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @onlyfanfelix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,298,578 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DefiHopes: гайды на Felix” (@onlyfanfelix), 94 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onlyfanfelix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.