17 Jan 2022, 20:17 UTCviews —
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 10 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
Channel
ONLINE Bog'cha
@onlinebogcha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
261subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001286287662 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onlinebogcha |
| Created | 4 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onlinebogcha |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 261 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 264 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:09 | 264 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 June 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 January 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
28 Dec 2021, 12:48 UTCviews —
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 30 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
28 Nov 2020, 10:13 UTC≈20,200 viewsread 7 August 2026
https://t.me/fis_rasmiy/576
18 Nov 2020, 16:40 UTC≈21,500 viewsread 7 August 2026
https://t.me/fis_rasmiy/559
13 Nov 2020, 04:18 UTC≈21,100 viewsread 7 August 2026
https://t.me/fis_rasmiy/545
6 Nov 2020, 05:57 UTC≈20,300 viewsread 7 August 2026
https://t.me/fis_rasmiy/513
15 Oct 2020, 07:59 UTC≈22,700 viewsread 7 August 2026
https://t.me/onlinebogcha/157
15 Oct 2020, 07:58 UTC≈19,600 viewsread 7 August 2026
https://t.me/onlinebogcha/168
15 Oct 2020, 07:56 UTC≈17,400 viewsread 7 August 2026
.
15 Oct 2020, 07:54 UTCviews —
Channel photo removed
14 Oct 2020, 19:35 UTC≈15,900 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @japanskillcenterFile
File, posted without a caption
7 Jul 2020, 11:05 UTC≈15,400 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bvmtbpress
https://clck.ru/PW9oY
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @onlinebogcha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@onlinebogcha named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@fis_rasmiy
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ONLINE Bog'cha” (@onlinebogcha), 261 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onlinebogcha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.