Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Визер, настрой-ка online

Channel

Визер, настрой-ка online

@online_tehnichka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

239subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001615214712
TypeChannel
Username@online_tehnichka
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/online_tehnichka

Growth

2392432417 August 2026 — 243 subscribers8 August 2026 — 243 subscribers14 August 2026 — 241 subscribers22 August 2026 — 240 subscribers28 August 2026 — 243 subscribers4 September 2026 — 242 subscribers12 September 2026 — 239 subscribers7 August 202612 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 36 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 238–244 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 14:57239-3
4 Sept 2026, 16:38242-1
28 Aug 2026, 23:03243+3
22 Aug 2026, 17:52240-1
14 Aug 2026, 15:09241-2
8 Aug 2026, 09:46243no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:43243first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
48s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

454 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15734.6%
🔥9019.8%
👍6714.8%
😁306.61%
💯224.85%
😱204.41%
🎉173.74%
🤯153.30%
🥰132.86%
👎122.64%
custom 542736053196922610371.54%
🤬40.881%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 454 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2025 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9,210
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 20 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
5,080
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @online_tehnichka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 March 2025 to 21 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Apr 2026, 10:09 UTC298 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rhymestgPhoto

⚡️ МАХ официально переименовали в МАКС — русификацию можно увидеть как в онлайн-сторах, так и в самом приложении Подписывайся на Рифмы и Панчи в МАКС — это реально необходимо, ведь Telegram могут полностью заблокировать в любой момент, и тогда... мы с вами тут не увидимся 😢

21 Apr 2026, 10:09 UTC286 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

как выглядит позор гос,уровня запомните и не повторяйте в своих проектах ⬇️⬇️⬇️

9 Apr 2026, 10:41 UTC341 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Это я к чему тут принялась репостить, много вопросов было "как и что и куда" А я всегда говорила: давайте не выключать голову и холодный разум, и смотреть по ситуации. В частности про телегу я абсолютно всем НЕ рекомендовала ставить и подумать о безопасности. надуюсь, никого не коснется больше, чем такие новости! берегите свои данные и следите за информационной гигиеной❤️

💯5

9 Apr 2026, 10:39 UTC317 views11 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Телега признана шпионским софтом? Речь про ТЕЛЕГУ (не путать с телеграм) Напомню, что еще неделю назад команда ТЕЛЕГРАМ стала предупреждать пользователей, если у собеседника установлен клиент ТЕЛЕГА. Кто уже установил? ❤️ — я установил(а) 👍 — не стал(а) устанавливать

👍11

9 Apr 2026, 03:52 UTC245 views15 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mashapoluyanovaPhoto

Интересно, какой впн юзает Роскомнадзор для постов в тг?

😁13🔥2

13 Feb 2026, 17:33 UTC541 views16 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

улыбаемся и пашем машем пока все блокировки идут (путь им доррожка) мы так-то продолжаем работать а что делать еще хочу поделиться сервисом, где я собираю чат-ботов (ТГ, макс, ВК, ОК) ребята просто пушка-бомба – в такое шаткое время тоже работают не покладая рук, чтобы нам было удобно и комфортно собирать воронки 🔥🔥🔥 и эти кудесники – сервиc BotHanter почему я с ними? потому что: 1) это безопасно (все в РФ) 2)

🔥7👍54

11 Feb 2026, 13:47 UTC442 views25 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

похороны телеграма меня бомбит точнее, бомбило вчера знатно от всеобщей паники, что даже писать не хотелось сегодня легче, поэтому рассказываю свое мнение во-первых: ну когда нас русский люд можно было напугать блокировкой, ептить?? почему у всех такой приступ ора? да, много контента, я понимаю да, большие базы лидов, я понимаю ну и что теперь, лечь и умереть? найдется решение обязательно, тем более полных стопр

🔥167💯1😱1

8 Feb 2026, 14:54 UTC357 views25 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

телеграм уже все... или о том, как не получается стабильно писать, но вот выйти на связь, когда бомбит – это мы завсегда пожалуйста короче, стабильно 2-3-4 разща в месяц я слышу вопрос "а что, ТГ заблокируют, или как?" если интересно, я как-нибудь пост напишу со своим мнением, но сегодня не об этом предыстория: просыпаюсь я сегодня утром, смотрю время на телефоне, вижу в уведомлениях срочно важное сообщение откр

💯12😁54🤬4

10 Dec 2025, 15:29 UTC685 views30 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

скоро новый год а в делах и в голове вот примерно как на скрине: жопа горит, ничего не помогает и примерно такой пежим последние 2 месяца. кайф. просто захотелось написать, что я в порядке (почти) и кукуха на месте (почти) а то многие спрашивают, когда уже тут будет полезное🙏🏼 завтра скину зумерский лайфхак прикольный )) поэтому если кто-то мечтает добраться до курантов в сознании и здравом уме – я вас обнимаю ❤

14🔥9👍5🤯2

10 Oct 2025, 14:14 UTC911 views62 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Я ХОРОШИЙ СПЕЦИАЛИСТ чего бы я орала, скажете вы? потому что уверена в этом, отвечу я ситуация: на днях запускала вебинар в связке zoom+ВК стрим все как обычно, штатный созвон в рамках онлайн-курса и вот я (как обычно) начинаю в сообществе создавать стрим, выбираю (как обычно) способ запуска, и – тадаааааам – меня ВООБЩЕ НЕ как обычно перекидывает хер пойми куда. я даже сперва думала, что нажала что-то лишнее,

31👍22😱9

3 Oct 2025, 15:00 UTC646 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как-то так прошли последние 2 недели

😁116💯4🤯3🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @online_tehnichka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Mar 2025, 05:20 UTCAnonymous Poll115 voters

Перекличка: кто есть в канале?

  1. я эксперт (в любой нише)46%
  2. я коллега-технарь23%
  3. я коллега из другой ниши12%
  4. я друг/знакомый8%
  5. пиши уже скорее, нечего вафлить10%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2025 to 21 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Визер, настрой-ка online” (@online_tehnichka), 239 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/online_tehnichka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.