Channel
@onickscos00
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
233subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001905883106 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onickscos00 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 30 November 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onickscos00 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 233 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 233 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (5 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,814 |
| Reactions total | 134 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
223 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 99 | 44.4% | |
| 🍓 | 32 | 14.3% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 8.52% | |
| custom 5283132635361587188 | 18 | 8.07% | |
| custom 5397967717120623295 | 16 | 7.17% | |
| custom 5368764280265018405 | 13 | 5.83% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 4.04% | |
| custom 5429479355300466438 | 7 | 3.14% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 1.35% | |
| custom 5267342072133723125 | 2 | 0.897% | |
| custom 5282791009367895224 | 2 | 0.897% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 0.897% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.448% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 223reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 15.08-16.08 И так первый день Выступаю в сценке по монду за шикарную Мону А так же в сценке по амфориусу за нимфу Остаток дня пробегаю в Лилии ванруж с Эпелем Второй день Первая половина дня выступаю в Изуми фьюжен вторая поливна снова Лилия потому что у него тапки удобные #азиябризлето2026 #анонс
custom 52831326353615871884💘3❤1🍓1
Signed Oraris#INTP
Ну... С богом
❤🔥9❤3🍓1💘1
Signed Oraris#INTP
БЛЯЯЯ ЭТО ПРИНЯЛИ МНЕ ПРИДЁТСЯ ХОДИТЬ ПОЗОРИТЬСЯ 😭😭
💘5
Signed Oraris#INTP
Самый позорный костюм в мире запомните его и никогда не покупайте
💘5❤1custom 52831326353615871881
Signed Oraris#INTP
Раз уж анимеге быть я начинаю лютую подготовку ну может на азию этот номер ещё подам но не точно
🍓4💘4❤2
Signed Oraris#INTP
На азии я буду шляться в новеханьких костюмчиках к слову 😛
🍓9💘3
Signed Oraris#INTP
Начинаю разбор всех ненужных мне косплеев в этот список вошла светлячок отдам с париком за 2000 за фото в лс
🍓3
Signed Oraris#INTP
Крч тут суа продаю 1600 Парик могу закинуть бесплатно он убитый прост размер L-XL все на месте живое прям как новое кроме парика он умер Бронь ⭐️ @onicks_cos
❤7💘1
Signed Oraris#INTP
Пока прихожу в себя потихоньку кидаю спойлеры к азии Укладка от шикарного вигмейкера
💘13❤3custom 54294793553004664382🍓1
Signed Виктор Петрович
Ощущение что меня завтра будут не оперировать а пытать моя палата выглядит как пыточная
💘12custom 53687642802650184056custom 52827910093678952241
Signed Семен Лобанов
Извиняюсь за отсутствие контента но его не будет скорее всего до августа я уже готовлюсь к важной для меня операции Но в августе вас ждет интересный перс и фьюжен изуми 👤 Ну чтож увидимся уже на самой азии 👤
💘13custom 53979677171206232955custom 54294793553004664385❤2🍓2🥰1
Signed 𝑂𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑠#𝐼𝑁𝑇𝑃
Ночь перед важным днем (Сигны делаю)
custom 528313263536158718811custom 53687642802650184055custom 53979677171206232952💘1
Signed 𝑂𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑠#𝐼𝑁𝑇𝑃
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @onickscos00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 149,206 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рест ~𐌏ᥒiᥴκs ʙᥱщᥲᥱᴛ ~🌹” (@onickscos00), 233 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onickscos00.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.