Channel
@onesec
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
882subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001596098532 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @onesec @onesec_uz |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onesec |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 882 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:28 | 881 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 881 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 877 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 877 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 878 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 878 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (8 July 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,553 |
| Reactions total | 68 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
221 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 79 | 35.7% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 22.6% | |
| custom 5305671468384820133 | 44 | 19.9% | |
| custom 5305351123954079997 | 20 | 9.05% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 6.79% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.26% | |
| 😎 | 3 | 1.36% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.905% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 0.905% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.452% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ONESEC O‘zbekistondagi tashkilotingiz buxgalterlarini HUSH platformasida kibergigiyena bo‘yicha bepul kurslardan o‘tishga taklif etadi! Bugungi kunda firibgarlar nafaqat IT bo‘limlariga hujum qilmoqda. Jinoyatchilar uchun asosiy nishonlardan biri buxgalteriya hisoblanadi, chunki buxgalterlar har kuni to‘lovlar, bank tizimlari va maxfiy ma’lumotlar bilan ishlaydi. Shu sababli ular phishing, korporativ elektron pochta…
🔥5👍3
ONESEC приглашает бухгалтеров вашей организации в Узбекистане бесплатно пройти курсы на платформе HUSH по кибергигиене! Сегодня мошенники атакуют не только ИТ-подразделения. Одной из основных целей злоумышленников становится бухгалтерия: специалисты ежедневно работают с платежами, банковскими системами и конфиденциальными данными, поэтому чаще других сталкиваются с фишингом, компрометацией корпоративной почты и друг…
🔥7👍1
⚠️🪙Хакеры атаковали крупнейшие финансовые компании США Серия кибератак затронула ведущие инвестиционные и финансовые организации, среди которых Blackstone, Apollo Global Management, KKR, Bain Capital, Bridgewater Associates, CME Group и Moody's. По данным Google Threat Intelligence, в отдельных случаях компании были вынуждены выплатить выкуп злоумышленникам. Точные суммы и названия организаций не раскрываются. 🖥По…
custom 530567146838482013310🔥6👍5😎1custom 53053511239540799971
🏦ЦБ РУз, CAFA и ONESEC провели закрытый семинар по вопросам кибербезопасности банковского сектора 29 июля в гостинице JW Marriott Hotel Tashkent Центральный банк Республики Узбекистан совместно с Central Asian Fintech Association (CAFA) и компанией ONESEC — резидентом Cyber Park провели закрытый семинар «Кибербезопасность в банковском секторе: современные угрозы и практические решения». Мероприятие объединило руков…
👍14custom 53056714683848201338🔥6custom 53053511239540799971
🇺🇿O‘zbekistonda IT-jinoyatchilikka qarshi kurash choralarini kuchaytirishga qaratilgan qonun loyihasi qabul qilindi. Hujjat banklar, to‘lov tashkilotlari, to‘lov tizimlari operatorlari va provayderlarining majburiyatlarini kengaytiradi, shuningdek, Ichki ishlar vazirligini kiberjinoyatchilikka qarshi kurash sohasidagi bosh muvofiqlashtiruvchi organ sifatida belgilaydi. Qonun loyihasidagi eng muhim o‘zgarish - hodis…
custom 53056714683848201335🔥4custom 53053511239540799972👍1
🇺🇿В Узбекистане принят законопроект, усиливающий меры борьбы с IT-преступлениями. Документ расширяет обязанности банков, платёжных организаций, операторов платёжных систем и провайдеров, а также определяет МВД главным координатором в сфере противодействия киберпреступности. Главное изменение - смещение акцента с реагирования на предупреждение инцидентов. Организации должны будут: ➖выявлять подозрительные операции…
🔥5👍3👏2custom 53056714683848201332⚡1
⚠️Поддельный my.gov.uz и ущерб свыше 1 млрд сумов Центр кибербезопасности сообщил о раскрытии группы, подозреваемой в хищении более 1 млрд сумов у 456 граждан. По данным следствия, злоумышленники создали фишинговый сайт, имитирующий my.gov.uz, обещали пользователям государственные выплаты, а затем получали доступ к их банковским картам и похищали денежные средства. Этот случай — ещё одно напоминание, что кибермоше…
👍8🔥5😎2
🎤 Заместитель генерального директора по вопросам развития бизнеса М. Ибрагимов выступил в качестве спикера на мероприятии "Кибербезопасное предпринимательство", организованном партией O'zLiDeP и IT Park Uzbekistan. В ходе выступления М. Ибрагимов осветил актуальные вопросы защиты бизнеса от современных киберугроз, представив практические подходы к предотвращению утечек данных и повышению уровня киберосведомлённости …
🔥6❤5custom 53056714683848201335👍4👏3❤🔥2
🗓За последние годы компании серьёзно инвестировали в средства защиты: усилили контроль доступа, внедрили новые решения для мониторинга и реагирования, повысили уровень технической зрелости. Однако вместе с этим менялись и методы злоумышленников, всё чаще атака начинается не с поиска уязвимости в системе, а с взаимодействия с ЧЕЛОВЕКОМ, у которого уже есть необходимые доступы и полномочия. ⏱Поэтому эффективность защ…
🔥7custom 53056714683848201335custom 53053511239540799974❤2
🤦🏻Осознание № 215465 : сотрудник, который открыл фишинговую ссылку, тоже был уверен, что с ним такого не случится. 📘 HUSH — корпоративные курсы по кибербезопасности от ONESEC _____ 🤦🏻№215465 sonli haqiqat: Fishing havolasini ochib yuborgan xodim ham avvaliga bu holat aynan uning boshiga tushmaydi, deb o‘ylagan. 📘 HUSH - kiberxavfsizlik bo‘yicha korporativ kurslar
🔥9custom 53053511239540799974❤3custom 53056714683848201332😈1
❗Исследователь ONESEC обнаружил уязвимость (CVE-2026-9105) в роутерах TP-Link TL-WR841N Уязвимость приводит к отказу в обслуживании: устройство перезагружается, подключение для всех клиентов временно прерывается. Уязвимость относится к классу повреждения памяти — потенциально это может привести к полной компрометации устройства. TP-Link подтвердила проблему и 29 июня 2026 года опубликовала официальный бюллетень безо…
🔥18custom 53056714683848201337❤2👍1😈1
❌Ошибки сотрудников приводят к утечкам данных. И это по-прежнему одна из главных проблем кибербезопасности. Несколько реальных примеров последних лет: 1. Сотрудник перевёл мошенникам около $25 млн после видеозвонка с дипфейками руководства компании. 2. Взлом 23andMe начался не со сложной атаки, а с использования паролей, которые пользователи ранее применяли на других сервисах. В результате были затронуты миллионы за…
👍10custom 53053511239540799978❤3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @onesec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 730,860 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇺🇿ONESEC Кибербезопасность” (@onesec), 882 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onesec.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.