Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for One Channel! 跨儿骄傲联合广播

Channel

One Channel! 跨儿骄傲联合广播

@onechannel4alltrans

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,788subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001755356321
TypeChannel
Username@onechannel4alltrans
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/onechannel4alltrans

Growth

1,7881,7911,789.56 August 2026 — 1,789 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,790 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,791 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,788 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,788–1,791 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:371,788-3
10 Aug 2026, 19:571,791+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:301,790+1
6 Aug 2026, 14:511,789first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 12 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.9%
avg views ÷ 1,788 subscribers
Avg views / post
463
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held16 (12 May 202624 July 2026)
Views total1,390
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

138 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9065.2%
🥰4834.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC264 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

这几天,非常感谢大家填写这份问卷,也感谢很多朋友分享自己的经验和想法。 看完大家的回答之后,我最大的感受是:很多朋友遇到的问题都很相似。 很多事情其实已经有人做过,也积累了不少经验,但这些经验往往很难传递给后来参与的人。于是,同样的问题不断被重复回答,同样的资料不断被重新整理,同样的摸索也一次又一次地发生。 大家提到最多的,也都是一些很具体、很实际的需求,例如新人入门、常见问题、资源整理等。这些事情未必宏大,却很可能帮助后来参与的人更快进入状态,也让长期承担工作的朋友减少一些重复劳动。 不过,大家也提醒了我一件很重要的事:有些能力只能在实践、交流和长期积累中培养。因此,我们目前要做的只是留存经验,让更多人能够参考,并非强行流程化所有行动(当然这也是做不到的)。 所以,让我们尝试迈出第一步吧。 我计划围绕一个具体而有限的主题,例如新人入门指南或常见问题整理,开设一个专门的讨论文档。有兴趣的朋友可以在里面分享经验、补充资

4

22 Jul 2026, 07:23 UTC552 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

转载 | 想邀请大家参与一个关于经验保存的小调查 https://forms.gle/78YeTYZx5DHWJCC1A 我们或许都同意,很多实际工作中的能力来自长期实践,其中不少经验很难完全整理成固定方法。同时,也有一些资料、流程和重复出现的问题,可以通过适当整理,让后来参与的人更容易了解情况,减少反复摸索。 所以我们想听听大家的看法: 哪些经验适合被记录下来? 哪些内容更适合通过交流、实践传递? 什么样的整理方式比较符合实际需求? 这份问卷主要用于了解大家的经验和判断,希望找到能对大家有帮助、也适合长期维护的内容。

6

19 Jul 2026, 16:42 UTC574 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

转载 | 跨性别运动工作者经验分享会 你来自性少数群体被政府打压的地区吗?你想知道身处困境中,却依旧为性少数权益斗争的ta们是如何开展工作的么?我们邀请了两位曾身处东亚多年,经验丰富的LGBTQIA+ 运动工作者。在大家相聚之余,她们会分享自己在NGO事业上,如何帮助受困人群,维护性少数基本人权与政府和保守思想斗争的经验。 分享者: · Joanne Leung 梁詠恩:Joanne 在2008年创办香港跨性别资源中心,并在2014年至2017年先后担任粉红同盟副主席及主席。 · Felicity 欢喜:欢喜(她/ta),投身跨性别运动八年多,先后在中国及加拿大的多个跨儿、酷儿、女权非盈利组织及草根小组工作或担任志愿者,目前在温哥华一家以跨儿和酷儿为核心的非盈利组织担任项目协调员。 如果您向往参与 LGBTQIA+ 的社会运动,试试参与这次聚会,和 Joanne 与 Felicity,以及其他的海兔志愿者们,相聚的伙伴们一起

12

16 Jul 2026, 01:27 UTC500 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

自己的文章自己推薦 這一篇文章透過用全球最大反跨品牌Grok AI來告訴你,AI也是有立場的,而且可能還是包裝過的。我們用一次實測,帶你看懂 AI 的「中立」是怎麼被設定的,以及為什麼這件事對某些人特別危險。 https://ethome.cc/grok-ai-neutrality-cross-language-test/

🥰63

13 Jul 2026, 20:26 UTC735 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

One Among Us 社媒运营招募启事 我们是从技术社群起家的跨性别社群支持组织。我们缺少运营社交媒体和往外宣传自己的经验,有的时候很难把自己真正在做的坚持的事情推广出去让别人了解,别人骂我们也是情有可原的,因为别人根本很多时候没有了解我们的机会。因此我们现在就想找一个能帮我们活动摄影(可选,人不在多伦多完全不要紧,帮我们把我们拍的照片稍微捯饬一下),活动完事修图,然后美美发社交媒体,然后平时还能多上网,跟别的组织眉来眼去,和热心网友积极互动的,这么一个人。不会做上面全部无所谓,会做任何一些愿意来帮忙都可以。付不起钱,以后有钱了可以商量。志愿者岗位,工作环境包容,欢迎来申请。虽然没有报酬,但是有很多组织内成员的支持项目。申请方式就发个自我介绍到 [email protected] 表明来意就好了。社媒运营?大概可以叫这个名字。感谢大家帮助!

9🥰1

29 Jun 2026, 06:29 UTC820 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Reportback: 快住进 OAU 大棚! 很高兴今天在 Grange Park 与许多伙伴度过一个难忘的下午。

🥰101

29 Jun 2026, 06:13 UTC≈1,070 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Online Workshop: Reconcile with your "normie" favourites? Jun 30 (Tue) 2-4 pm (Eastern Time) ALL WELCOME, NO RSVP TV series, anime, video games… Some were just not tailored for us, and hardly offered a safe space for our presence. Sometimes it just hurts, even when we hold many of the memories we've accumulated from childhood, along with our own unique interpretations. We invite you to share these experiences in a s

1

26 Jun 2026, 22:06 UTC548 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

大家好,因为 519 今天不开门,我们今天的常规社群活动改到它对面的室外空间,576 Church St 的 Progress Place 门口,欢迎大家来聚会! Hello everyone, since 519 is closed today, our regular community activities have been moved to the outdoor space across from it, the entrance of Progress Place at 576 Church St. Everyone is welcome to come and gather!

8

21 Jun 2026, 22:59 UTC745 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Happy Pride! Welcome to our One Among Us Pride Month Events (English) ♿️ Accessible, No RSVP 2026.6.26 18:30—20:30 Toronto Community Meetup 519 Church St Room 204, Toronto, ON M4Y 2C9 board games, discussion, preparing for Action! 2026.6.28 12:30—18:00 (c.) Abolition Pride! Grange Park (McCaul & Stephanie), Toronto bring your signs and make some noises! Lawn party after rally. 2026.6.30 14:00—16:00 Eastern Time On

5

21 Jun 2026, 22:57 UTC658 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

REPORTBACK: Sign making event We made a lot of signs and we are looking for anyone who can carry them to the ABOLITION PRIDE rally! See you on Sunday Jun 28, 12:30 at Grange Park! 我们做了很多中英文标牌,你愿意带着它们去游行吗?期待你来废警废监骄傲游行!28号(周日)12:30,固莲治公园等你!

6🥰5

20 Jun 2026, 03:03 UTC753 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

欢迎参加 One Among Us 2026 骄傲月系列活动·多伦多社群篇 6.20 Sat 创意手工:标牌制作 14:00–16:00 300 Victoria St (TMU campus) 6.26 Fri 社群茶会 18:30–20:30 519 Church St, Room 204 6.28 Sun Abolition Pride! 12:30–18:00 Grange Park (McCaul & Stephanie) 12:30–14:00 (c.) - 一起参加废除主义骄傲游行! 14:00 (c.)–18:00 - 也可直接来草坪聚会~

6

10 Jun 2026, 16:28 UTC788 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

转发 三月纪念跨性别正义组织 (中文版本在英文下面) We are thrilled to announce that our stream on the #CLC2026 is out! 2026 Critical Legal Conference will be held in University of Westminster on 9-11 Sept. This stream focuses on the impact of (extra)judicial protocol(s, or the lack thereof) on SOGI minority in China and elsewhere. My colleague, Tghnumnu Arikawa and me will be writing on the tripartite state persecution on transgender peo

🥰5

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @onechannel4alltrans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 221,379 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“One Channel! 跨儿骄傲联合广播” (@onechannel4alltrans), 1,788 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onechannel4alltrans.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.