Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DJ ON DA BLOOOCKX6

Channel

DJ ON DA BLOOOCKX6

@ondablooockx6_beats

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

241subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001858134872
TypeChannel
Username@ondablooockx6_beats
Created11 January 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ondablooockx6_beats

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 32% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

226243234.58 August 2026 — 226 subscribers16 August 2026 — 227 subscribers24 August 2026 — 230 subscribers1 September 2026 — 236 subscribers8 September 2026 — 236 subscribers10 September 2026 — 243 subscribers19 September 2026 — 241 subscribers2418 August 202619 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 42 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 223–246 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:01241-2
10 Sept 2026, 06:00243+7
8 Sept 2026, 14:23236no change
1 Sept 2026, 10:45236+6
24 Aug 2026, 18:05230+3
16 Aug 2026, 21:34227+1
8 Aug 2026, 05:05226first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 11 January 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
76.3%
avg views ÷ 241 subscribers
Avg views / post
184
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held18 (11 January 202330 August 2026)
Views total184
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Sept 2026, 14:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

141 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯4028.4%
2920.6%
custom 52763268688390553912114.9%
custom 52602535893889296081913.5%
💔1913.5%
custom 5327993001832647862128.51%
custom 519724880715842929310.709%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 141 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2023 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 09:51 UTC184 views8 reactionsread 8 September 2026

Females are like vsts, they need to be cracked only

💯8

23 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC325 views8 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Forwarded from @kaichukPhoto

1к на wet pack и tabetko0oooo всем сспасибооооо !

8

20 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC407 views17 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

мамин симпатяга, папин хулиган🥀😈☝🏻

💯104💔3

19 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC360 views18 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

я пью по дням, которые начинаются на букву С: Среда, суббота и сегодня. Сегодня Среда — значит пью вдвойне

💯144

18 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC336 views7 reactionsread 8 September 2026

От кого отписался — напишите в личку. Подпишусь обратно, все подряд чистил.

5💯2

16 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC365 views9 reactionsread 8 September 2026

Смарите чо пацаны насуетили. Вот тока с хаты откинулись и хуякс хуякс мяса

custom 52763268688390553915custom 52602535893889296082custom 53279930018326478622

16 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC317 views10 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Forwarded from @kaichukPhoto

КАЙЧУК® - Одни Руки FEAT: АРИКХАХАЕВ COVER: IG @new.culture.dsgn PROD: скейп + lifedream M&M КАЙЧУК SOUNDCLOUD!

custom 52763268688390553916custom 52602535893889296082custom 53279930018326478622

15 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC339 views7 reactionsread 8 September 2026

Здесь есть в канале челы, которые шарят в написаниях программ/плагинов для давок? Интересную идею придумал для битмейкеров!

3custom 52602535893889296082custom 52763268688390553912

14 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC369 views9 reactionsread 8 September 2026

Мои нигеры дома. Переживал за них очень сильно! Берегите себя и близких.

custom 526025358938892960871custom 51972488071584292931

13 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC363 views6 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Forwarded from @realtvndras3cret

#freeкайчук

💔41💯1

13 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC342 views6 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Forwarded from @realtvndras3cret

#freeарик

💔4💯1custom 52763268688390553911

13 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC328 views7 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Forwarded from @realtvndras3cret

#free@era

💔52

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ondablooockx6_beats. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DJ ON DA BLOOOCKX6” (@ondablooockx6_beats), 241 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ondablooockx6_beats.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.