не знаю, стоило ли показывать это вам перед сном…может, вы будете плакать… получилась трагикомедия…
❤23,900custom 522468108540055159710,300custom 52492353876619566504,280custom 52492179973393757021,650🔥316😭237💔200🙏97

Channel
@onastasiz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
681,938subscribers
-235 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001789378747 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onastasiz |
| Description | это я - Anastasiz (: конкурсы на деньги не провожу — это мошенники >:| сотрудничество: o@nastosis.ru реестр РКН: https://rknn.link/AL |
| Created | 13 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onastasiz |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 681,938 | -102 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 682,040 | -128 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 682,168 | +11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 682,157 | -18 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 682,175 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 682,171 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 682,173 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 June 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,272,000 |
| Reactions total | 247,693 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
762,003 reactions across 20 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 474,600 | 62.3% | |
| 🔥 | 41,991 | 5.51% | |
| 🙏 | 25,714 | 3.37% | |
| custom 5357447788764366583 | 18,540 | 2.43% | |
| 💔 | 16,812 | 2.21% | |
| 😭 | 15,706 | 2.06% | |
| custom 5467884905616658944 | 15,290 | 2.01% | |
| custom 5249295568743709387 | 13,562 | 1.78% | |
| custom 5469980506059721385 | 13,440 | 1.76% | |
| custom 5327909597862703781 | 12,470 | 1.64% | |
| custom 5373084673767407538 | 11,730 | 1.54% | |
| custom 5224681085400551597 | 10,300 | 1.35% | |
| 👍 | 8,489 | 1.11% | |
| custom 5291836747364194049 | 8,150 | 1.07% | |
| custom 5235810861787917997 | 7,550 | 0.991% | |
| custom 5469720462969819545 | 6,837 | 0.897% | |
| custom 5206279491294353130 | 6,150 | 0.807% | |
| custom 5262711019351868926 | 5,640 | 0.74% | |
| custom 5467891257873289677 | 5,360 | 0.703% | |
| custom 5249235387661956650 | 4,280 | 0.562% | |
| 27 further kinds | 39,392 | 5.17% |
Custom emoji. 14 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 762,003reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
не знаю, стоило ли показывать это вам перед сном…может, вы будете плакать… получилась трагикомедия…
❤23,900custom 522468108540055159710,300custom 52492353876619566504,280custom 52492179973393757021,650🔥316😭237💔200🙏97
так забавно совпало, кстати.. незадолго до шумихи с книгой в тиктоке, сидела и переживала, рассказать ли вам о том, как мне понравилась «Манюня»😂 (в ней могут быть некие триггеры для тех, кого «воспитывали» с применением силы (я слегка прочувствовала))) ) шумиха случилась подумала- НЕ БУДУ РЕКОМЕНДОВАТЬ))) СЕЙЧАС ВЕДЬ ЕЩЕ СКАЖУТ, что я поощряю физические наказания детей сегодня подумала- ДА ПОХ!)))))) что хочу ска…
❤20,800custom 54678849056166589445,980🙏2,880custom 5467672283260670325780custom 5467734066365221554457🔥264👍169✍98
люди правы…. я реально плохой человек и отношусь к зверушкам жестоко…вот, например! выложила фотографию Жоры! добри зрители начали о нём вспоминать, и теперь он икает!!!!! ладно, если серьезно- байчу)))) вот это я уже комментировать никак не буду. это уже совсем ржомба какая-то невероятная. БРИГАДА: в комментариях написали, что в тиктоке меня начали притягивать за жив****ство, потому что у меня собака породы мопс (…
❤28,300custom 54678849056166589449,310🔥3,870custom 54676722832606703251,540🙏366😁252💔237😭160
такую надо было?
❤24,000custom 52918367473641940498,150🔥3,540custom 52921325331719373241,200😭354😁303👍225🙏134
ладно уш поругались и хватит, я считаю предлагаю вам попереживать вместе со мной о том, что на роль «балерино-капучино» был выбран вообще не тот персонаж 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
❤22,100🔥5,620custom 54677134462272344083,730custom 54677949732964461961,360😁325😭281🤝180💔127
Прошу прощения у людей, на кого плохо повлияла книга, которую я порекомендовала 2 года назад Я не хотела сделать зла и навредить абсолютно никому Это была не реклама, мне за это не платили (если кого-то это интересует) Да, это действительно было опрометчиво и плохо- закрыть глаза на такую тему и порекомендовать книгу из-за других советов Разумеется, я не оправдываю преступников и никогда не обвиню жертву Жертва всегд…
❤37,200💔12,200😭7,300🙏1,610🔥808👍273💩146🖕84
не бейте…
❤40,900🔥14,400👍5,720custom 52245784786318506752,830custom 52247242326420071721,570custom 52268450187732964131,480😁542👏267
я уже сейчас как будто с ума сойду…но надеюсь, что хотя бы не зря почти доделала…сегодня или завтра……..
❤29,800🙏9,510💔3,370custom 52247242326420071721,900custom 52268450187732964131,040🔥398😭385😁188
а это уже я со своей клубничко пригласил меня на концерт сам его и отыграл я в восторге (только про Жанну обожаемую и желанную это он зря конечно, но красиво)
❤20,900custom 53279095978627037816,790custom 52492955687437093873,960custom 54699805060597213851,030custom 5453940783189073257303🔥224🙏75👏68
Ляля со своей клубничко на следующий день Удобряла травами от тренера-Светы
❤22,000custom 54699805060597213857,800custom 53279095978627037814,220custom 54539407831890732571,050custom 5249295568743709387522🔥245😁149💔118
Ляля со своей клубничко
❤24,200custom 52492955687437093879,080custom 54699805060597213854,610custom 53279095978627037811,460🔥281👍262😭228🙏75
извините я просто надолго уснула от травяного чая (кстати реально работает!)))))) жива живу делаю спорт сквозь боль моральную монтирую видик (Я НЕ ПРИДУМЫВАЮ- ОН ПРАВДА НЕ ОЧ) возможно, это будет уже третий, который не выйдет в интернет!))))))))))))))))))) всё ещё жду этих своих глобальных перемен как будто уже близко……😅
❤18,400😭4,960custom 52582497337422964792,800🙏611custom 5469720462969819545397custom 5467471665338273482303custom 5267117965035212004164👍147
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @onastasiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 753,334 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“О!настосис” (@onastasiz), 681,938 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onastasiz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.