Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ОМОН «Бастион»

Channel

ОМОН «Бастион»

@omon_piter

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

121subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001380486916
TypeChannel
Username@omon_piter
DescriptionВзгляд на жизнь из-под забрала защитного шлема...
Created24 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 October 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held6
On Telegramt.me/omon_piter

Growth

1171211196 August 2026 — 118 subscribers14 August 2026 — 117 subscribers12 September 2026 — 118 subscribers25 September 2026 — 120 subscribers7 October 2026 — 121 subscribers9 October 2026 — 121 subscribers6 August 20269 October 2026
6 measurements spanning 65 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116–122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 22:22121no change
7 Oct 2026, 04:17121+1
25 Sept 2026, 20:56120+2
12 Sept 2026, 14:41118+1
14 Aug 2026, 16:47117-1
6 Aug 2026, 09:52118first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 30 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.79%
avg views ÷ 121 subscribers
Avg views / post
7.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 3 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held3 (30 September 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total21
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Oct 2026, 22:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,420
Videos
≈1,180
Links
≈1,750

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

7 Oct 2026, 08:59 UTC6 viewsread 9 October 2026
Forwarded from @hackbereginiPhoto

Иногда очень интересно разбирать документы, которые мы получаем с компьютеров Министерства обороны Украины. Там можно найти удивительные вещи. Например, о том, что оказывается в ВСУ есть своя космическая программа. Все слышали про грандиозную афёру, когда телеведущий Сергей Притула собрал более 16 миллионов долларов на покупку спутника для украинской армии. Про украинский спутник на орбите Земли никто не слышал, как…

5 Oct 2026, 08:37 UTC7 viewsread 9 October 2026
Forwarded from @hackbereginiPhoto

Вчера Зеленский заявил о том, что Украина ведёт собственные разработки аналога «Starlink» и скоро запустит в космос свои спутники. Запускать группировку спутников будут, наверное, ракетами, которые произведёт Конструкторское бюро «Южное»? То самое, которое делало разгонные блоки во времена СССР? Увы, мы хотим расстроить Зеленского. За последние десятилетия в ракетах американского производства использовалась только о…

30 Sept 2026, 10:59 UTC8 viewsread 9 October 2026
Forwarded from @hackbereginiPhoto

Министр иностранных дел Польши Сикорский заявил, что его страна быстро победила бы Россию: «Мы довольно быстро победили бы Россию», — заявлил польский господин министр. А почему же он так распереживался? Может из-за того, что Польша ведёт себя как член конфликта? И позволяет Украине немного больше, чем официально заявляет? Сегодня мы хотим «прорекламировать» одну интересную украинскую компанию: ООО «ФТП» она же Frei…

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @omon_piter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ОМОН «Бастион»” (@omon_piter), 121 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/omon_piter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.