Channel
@omigumy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002409326909 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @omigumy |
| Description | .˳⁺⁎˚ ꒰ఎ ★ ໒꒱ ˚⁎⁺˳ . nail studio: °. * 🎀🎹 strawberry-toned gels, milk-glass / sheens / bow / tipped charms perched delicately upon fingertips. *˚⁺‧ 💬 ︱helper: @calycaa. ︱portofolio: @callelts. ︱testimonial: @cayword. |
| Created | 29 December 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/omigumy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 18 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:19 | 18 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 29 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
◞ , __ ,´◟ ꒰ 𓏸 ' ꒳ ' 𓏸 ꒱ ❀ 𖭜i᥅i:Ng (&.) αd.min 🤩 ᥫ᭡ ૮ ୨୧ っ( @swancous ₊ ˚ ᳝ ୵ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ⁺ 𑁯 ˖ 🤩 ׁ thꫀ c᪤ℓd m᪤᥅ning ᯤ 🤩𓈒 αtm᪤sphꫀ᥅ꫀ , with α fꫀw d᥅᪤℘ ’s ᪤f dꫀw dꫀc᪤᥅αting thꫀ ℘᥅incꫀss ’s 🤩 ⑅ ִ ֗ bꫀd᥅ᜊ᪤m wind᪤w , ℓꫀαvꫀs 🤩 f𞋎uttꫀ᥅ing in thꫀ b᥅ꫀꫀzꫀ ᪤utsidꫀ , xo 。 ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ꒰ 𓈒 🤩 𓏸﹒bi᥅ds chi᥅℘ing bαck αnd f᪤᥅th , α nαtu᥅αℓ sign thαt α nꫀw dαყ . 🤩 ৎ ༝ …
🧾. . . generating new lab result [ GRAND OPENING: LITTLE SOUL LABS ] a new era of tiny art has begun! to celebrate, min-soul is giving away a lovely 20% discount on your first sweet commission. 🪄✨ what’s inside the lab? ♡ ⨾ tiny chibi art ♡ ⨾ chibi art inspired by hirono ♡ ⨾ soft line art (with your fav color) *˚⁺‧ grab your promo slot before it fades! 💌 send your letter : @bunnviess 🪞 peek our results : http…
Sticker, posted without a caption
✿ launched a new style of nail art style: pinkish and quite pale toned. ☆ 🎀♥️ è. stockholm signature IDR 7.000 click for the formulirs! 🧸 *˚⁺‧
Sticker, posted without a caption
✿ launched a new style of nail art style: pinkish and quite pale toned. ☆ 🎀♥️ è. stockholm signature IDR 6.000 click for the formulirs! 🧸 *˚⁺‧
Sticker, posted without a caption
✿ launched a new style of nail art style: pinkish and quite pale toned. ☆ 🎀♥️ è. stockholm signature IDR 8.000 click for the formulirs! 🧸 *˚⁺‧
Sticker, posted without a caption
✿ launched a new style of nail art style: pinkish and quite pale toned. ☆ 🎀♥️ è. stockholm signature IDR 10.000 click for the formulirs! 🧸 *˚⁺‧
Sticker, posted without a caption
✿ launched a new style of nail art style: pinkish and quite pale toned. ☆ 🎀♥️ è. stockholm signature IDR 25.000 click for the formulirs! 🧸 *˚⁺‧
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @omigumy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,283,211 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@omigumy named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“omigumy” (@omigumy), 18 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/omigumy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.