New month brings new token unlocks... Compared to February we're gonna be having more than 10 token unlocks this month. Seated for them all. gShort... Let's print.
❤2

Channel
@olympus_trades
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
717subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002240453900 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @olympus_trades |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/olympus_trades |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 717 | -4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 721 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:05 | 727 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 728 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 729 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 729 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
23 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 52.2% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 43.5% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 1 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
New month brings new token unlocks... Compared to February we're gonna be having more than 10 token unlocks this month. Seated for them all. gShort... Let's print.
❤2
For the past 4 months we have seen brutal price action in BTC and the crypto market in general which obviously screams of market manipulation because it makes no sense. Funny how after Jane street got exposed as the manipulator, BTC pumped from 62k to almost 70k This industry is absolutely brutal. https://x.com/1914ad/status/2026757796390449382?s=46&t=6xN1u0gEXwRZvlNAdhosAA
Slow but going
Set SL 0.039
🔥1
I’ve given you guys a lot of Degen/Spot trading signals. If you would like me sharing more futures signals. Signify below. Approximately $100-$200 daily
👍7
IOPN Alpha - Go to: learn.iopn.tech - Complete new quiz tasks and get $OPN tokens You can use and AI for answers All for now
❤2
Bought SOL @ 97 few days go on spot with the intention to DCA. Plan stays the same. Added more at $75 I’ve now filled out 20% positions on sol. Average is $86
I’ll admit that I didn’t anticipate the market pushing this deep into a bear phase. A ~50% correction from BTC’s ATH was not something I expected, especially considering the strength we saw in metals. Levels like 84k, 80k, and particularly 74k failed to hold, with little to no meaningful support. We’re now trading at price levels last seen roughly two years ago. Key areas of interest going forward (approximate, not…
Sadly no dip for you guys
❤1
The smartest way to play this AI coins is wait for the dips that’ll obviously come and make strategic bids, eventually you’ll get to sell for higher then you can hold the rest of the position to see if it becomes the one that giga booms
❤1
Keep an eye on this, this guy made a molt bot and gave it $50k to make autonomous decisions
Binance posted about what happened during 10/10 that crashed the market. You can read it here. https://www.binance.com/en/blog/community/8791765134688155261 However OKX founder also dropped some information about what happened that day https://x.com/star_okx/status/2017411129501426064?s=46&t=6xN1u0gEXwRZvlNAdhosAA Took them a long time to give us a proper response on what actually happened that day, I think ever…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @olympus_trades. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Olympus Trade Circle” (@olympus_trades), 717 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olympus_trades.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.