Any plumbing Non-profit? 🤣
❤8

Channel
@ololade
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
203subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002450117396 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ololade |
| Description | SpadeX Founder. Sharing my thoughts, discussing my projects. Biz: @RealXmart |
| Created | 6 November 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ololade |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 203 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:10 | 203 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 6 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
116 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5318783359294382499 | 22 | 19.0% | |
| custom 5890746988781116176 | 19 | 16.4% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 15.5% | |
| custom 5442828624757536533 | 15 | 12.9% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 11.2% | |
| custom 5438606753509957469 | 10 | 8.62% | |
| custom 5321231658156830001 | 8 | 6.90% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 6.03% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 1.72% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.72% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2024 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ololade. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 November 2024 to 10 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Any plumbing Non-profit? 🤣
❤8
"It’s a Financial Mistake" ~ My team when I acquired 🧽@WashaX. Pragmatically, it didn’t fit in the Group’s vision until proper tech was rigorously implemented into the "local business", as they concluded. "This is a Global brand, the Group’s vision remains solving problems using technological solutions. No misalignment detected as far as I’m concerned" ~ CTO Since my CTO agreed for the first time in a blue moon, I…
custom 543860675350995746910❤3
If I CAN, You Can TOO. 🤝🤝 This is not an advert, don’t be autistic!
custom 54428286247575365337❤3
I used to be autistic… I hardly communicated with anyone, worked on my projects tirelessly, and overall, I was doing well as a nerd. After all, the projects were progressing, and the profits were increasing. However, in the last two months, I’ve received numerous calls, in-person meetings with traders, investors, financiers, and neural network experts. I missed out on so much because of my tunnel vision… niches wh…
custom 54428286247575365338❤2👨💻2
1. no Junks 2. no drinking 3. no smoking 4. no overTrading 5. no womanizing 6. no procrastinating… That was me in 2024 🤷♂️ Some rules are meant to test your discipline, not necessarily to eliminate bad habits. After all, no one tells you "bad habits die when a part of you dies". You’ll figure it out when it’s too late, I promise you. Not only is experience the best teacher, it’ll kill that part of you when you le…
custom 589074698878111617613custom 53187833592943824993
While there’s a lot to analyze from your blog post Sergei, I’ve noticed that you seem to be fixated on subconsciously infuriating Nigerians; this post proved it. You made a joke about the Nigerian currency and government in a rather insensitive way which is quoted above. Every nation has its own challenges and drawbacks. Instead of trying to provoke your audience, consider conveying your messages in a positive and i…
🤣7❤1
@Africapitalism 🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️
custom 58907469887811161764custom 53187833592943824993
Hello guys ♠️♠️ Due to the ban, I’ll be active here. Remember, I’ll never DM first 📌
custom 53187833592943824997custom 58907469887811161762👍1
Here’s my SpadeX link. I’ll randomly select 10 profiles to fund a Lend position of $10,000 each on ♠️ SpadeX P2P Lend.
👍10custom 53187833592943824995❤1
New channel. I will never DM you first ‼️
custom 53212316581568300018custom 53187833592943824994👍2🙏2
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ololade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ololade Ayomide” (@ololade), 203 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ololade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.