Channel
@ollieramone
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
361subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003082712533 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ollieramone |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ollieramone |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:11 | 361 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 362 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 362 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (26 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,437 |
| Reactions total | 168 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
168 reactions across 14 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 59 | 35.1% | |
| 🕊 | 41 | 24.4% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 8.93% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 5.36% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 4.76% | |
| 🤡 | 8 | 4.76% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.98% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 2.38% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 2.38% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.79% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.79% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 1.19% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.19% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 1.19% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.595% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.595% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.595% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я чувствую себя, как беременная в 1 триместре, постоянная тошнота и слабость, а все из-за антибиотиков! Никогда не пила такие сильные, чтобы было так плохо от них, даже думала бросить от отчаяния)) А мне еще сегодня клеить обои на плитку (да, я решила быть антипримером во всех сферах жизни, может быть, это и есть мое призвание?!)
❤4
Я думала, может мне прорекламироваться, но не знаю даже. Надо текст рекламы придумать, хотя бы)) Может черкнете в комментариях, почему вы тут, что заставило подписаться (если помните хаха) и почему остались?
👍3🕊1
Ой блин а я забыла про клинику-то рассказать Короче я пошла в клинику и говорю так и так, мне как бы чиститься надо, остатки пя А мне хирург говорит, у вас эти остатки превратились в полип, 53к за гистероскопию и все будет збс)) ну и прямо в клинике можно сдать за 20к все анализы для операции Я сначала соглашаюсь, потом начинаю сомневаться, иду в другое место, и там мне говорят — вы можете сделать обычный вакуум!!…
👏5❤2🤔1
Вы тоже не понимаете, откуда малыш знает какие-то слова и выражения?? Строго сказала Яне - «прекрати лазать в этот ящик и выкидывать все оттуда!» А она мне: «Прости, мама, я нечаянно 🥺🥺🥺🥺»
❤4❤🔥1🥰1
Ойййй блиииин отгадайте какая трагедия случилась на этих фото)))
😁4🥰2😭2
В общем все норм, я быстро раздуплилась! Начинается отпуск, завтра приедет флакончик румынской ниши, дома плюс минус чисто, денежек в этом месяце заработала норм, через неделю Ясечкин день рождения, короче В ТЕОРИИ ничто не должно отравить мне жизнь в ближайшее время!!! Кстати скоро расскажу вам как меня чуть не развели на 50к в одной клинике. Если интересно ставьте голубя!!!!!
🕊37💅1🔥1
Чет меня хуевит, я думала я такая проснусь и буду веселиться ахаха Надо отсюда потихоньку выбираться и пойти похавать
😱9🕊3
Эту девочку уже понимает колонка Алиса!! -Аися! -Я здесь! Что вы хотели спросить? -Аися, пасиба! -Пожалуйста! -Аися, кабок (Алиса, колобок) -Включаю сказку Колобок. И я такая 😑 P.S. я по-прежнему против залезания детей на лавки в обуви, но это игровая лавка, на ней не сидят))
❤12❤🔥2
Девочки, если што, делаю распив потихонечку своей коллекции, кто хочет попробовать эту шикарную вайбовую туберозу — велкам, пишите!! Распиваю от 2 миликов. Аромат горько-сладкий, в жару ультрасливочный и цветочный. Если что я не переквалифицирую свой канал в распивочную, просто, к слову пришлось)
❤5
Я просто хотела красивые фотки с дочкой типа мы такие девочки в платьях Но разве этот шилопоп даст?)))
❤11🥰2
Сорри, но мне больше негде это всё рассказать)) пост про нишевый парфюм)) В общем решила я затестить нашумевший Inexcusable evil от румынского бренда Toskovat’ В картинках можно посмотреть ноты аромата и отзывы — ну как такое не затестить-то?)) Сначала мне подарил отливант мой парень. Когда я его понюхала (сорри я даже после парфюмерных курсов не воспринимаю это вот «слушать ароматы»), я удивилась. Потому что даже…
❤8
И как бы знаете, внимания от меня требует человек который на мое «кружится голова очень» отвечает со смехом «хеликоптер, хеликоптер» Пишу и сама ржу)) но блять, это какой-то если честно провал. При том что у меня уже развивается анемия на фоне полипа, и это не очень смешно… Вообще, мне кажется, он недиагностированный этот как его… функциональный аутист? Или как это называется? Я не помню короче, но это не оскорблен…
❤12
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ollieramone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 826,839 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Моя Занзара” (@ollieramone), 361 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ollieramone.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.