Нормально
Signed Йоу

Channel
@oll1nd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002471387032 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oll1nd |
| Description | So baby hold my hand now. . ówn — @HMSHIO / @H110KI для удобства — @oll1nd design — @portvamp |
| Created | 27 November 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oll1nd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 19 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 19 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 27 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
54 reactions across 2 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5260598316349004473 | 8 | 14.8% | |
| custom 5390931495537887188 | 7 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5397610221222767604 | 6 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5274205511477108638 | 4 | 7.41% | |
| custom 5341582514580373239 | 4 | 7.41% | |
| custom 5334809286730063071 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| custom 5339068464063585664 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| custom 5343700624947035141 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| custom 5343770997986182330 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| custom 5262987774159494142 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| custom 5343845601568111716 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| custom 5343914819261054139 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| custom 5443025046496887822 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| custom 5460651935877057304 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| custom 5278371337696458596 | 1 | 1.85% | |
| custom 5440636718262804952 | 1 | 1.85% | |
| custom 5440731405111810541 | 1 | 1.85% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2024 to 7 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Нормально
Signed Йоу
😑
Signed casual
закройся 😒
Signed 𝐇𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐡𝐢 𝐝𝐞 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐨
Ты даунша
Signed casual
в смысле тут еще кто-то есть
Signed 𝐇𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐬𝐡𝐢 𝐝𝐞 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐨
новые каналы владельцев хошими — @LMCH1RR хиоки — @AT4SHH
Signed astrum. f's
оллинд закрывается, по личным причинам. все союзы разрываются, семейные и брак — смотрите сами. думаю оллинд восстановит свою деятельность ближе к маю/июню. я оставляю подписку на семейных и ещё парочку каналов. мой лс всегда открыт для разговоров. если не хотите меня потерять, ищите меня на каналах отцов Я (@H110KI) хочу выразить свою благодарность, всем кто был с ними и будет дальше. К сожалению все подходит к кон…
Signed hm de lf. f's
Sticker, posted without a caption
с 08.10.23 название «ollind/ollindskie», либо «оллинд/оллиндские» принадлежит только нам. вы не имеете никакого права брать такое же название/оформление, которое было сделано исключительно для нашего клана. если же, мы увидим, что вы все же это сделали, мы можем написать вам с претензиями и просьбой сменить название/оформление.
custom 53415825145803732394custom 53437006249470351413custom 53437709979861823303custom 53438456015681117162custom 53439148192610541392custom 54430250464968878222
Sticker, posted without a caption
рlease stay, I want you, I need you, oh God
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @oll1nd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,027,086 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@oll1nd named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“затерялись в пограничье” (@oll1nd), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oll1nd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.