Channel
@olgaponam
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
106subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002384802613 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @olgaponam |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/olgaponam |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:45 | 106 | +2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 104 | +8 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 01:36 | 96 | +1 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 05:59 | 95 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 94 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 92 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 91 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 91 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
114 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 50 | 43.9% | |
| 👍 | 35 | 30.7% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 12.3% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 3.51% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 3.51% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.75% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.877% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.877% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я фасциально работаю со шрамами. Отрабатываю натяжения, убираю жёсткость. Вот и вчера работала с восьмилетней девочкой после сложного перелома руки. И считаю, что любой шрам, шов необходимо отрабатывать и интегрировать в фасциальные натяжения тела. Но вот сейчас прочитала у своего преподавателя Антона Грачева важный текст про шрамы. А ведь я тоже могу так как он, он всё это рассказывал и показывал на занятиях. И так…
❤3👍1
Вчера такая красивая работа получилась с девушкой 25 лет 😍😍😍 Работали ФМ Запрос был про осанку. Особых проблем со здоровьем, слава Богу нет, но плечики да, завернуты вперёд. И положение головы при оценке постуры - чуть наклон вправо. Двигательный тест показал затруднение движения по горизонтальной плоскости. Также тест на положение таза показал небольшой перекос. Отработала несколько точек на горизонтальной плоскост…
❤10👍3👏2
Я собираюсь в августе это попрактиковать! У меня как раз признаки высокого кортизола
❤4
Я ВКонтакте: vk.com/id609308518
👍3
И в ВКонтакте меня тоже можно найти!😘
👍2
https://max.ru/join/D-iZh24yPx_P7KymKJ6bYm7wO3rnyWf2F-IxipYY_Jk
👍2
Подписывайтесь на меня в Макс и сохраняйте мой телефон для связи пожалуйста
👍2
Ах, сколько ж в этом мире суеты... Живём свой век в какой-то вечной гонке! А рядом, что-то шепчут нам цветы… Роса искрится в паутине тонкой… Лебяжий пух воздушных облаков Беззвучно падает с небес на воду… Вселенной правит Мудрая Любовь И дарит красоту свою природа! Светлана Мезенцева - Фирсова
❤5👍1
И ходить на массаж и на ФМ, добавлю я)))
😁5❤4👍1
В продолжение темы про источники удовольствия и гормоны радости, я хочу привести интересную подборку! Часто лишний вес связан с тем, что еда - это главный источник удовольствия. И вот ниже будут варианты откуда ещё можно черпать радость и положительное подкрепление) ТЕЛЕСНОЕ: комфортная одежда, горячий душ или ванна, чистая постель, массаж, приятные ароматы. Движение, спорт, танец, прогулка. СОЦИАЛЬНОЕ: разговоры …
❤5👍4
Суббота. Музей. Музыка. Я 🎻 18 июля закрываю первый день фестиваля MoreAmore Seasons. Локация — музей Скрябина (атмосфера там нереальная). В программе, кроме моего выступления: маркет, мастер-классы и куча классных людей. И главный бонус — вход бесплатный! Никаких билетов и регистраций, просто приходите и наслаждайтесь. Выхожу вживую после долгого студийного заточения — будет горячо. Приходите послушать, поболта…
❤4👍2
А была на концерте этого музыканта, мне очень понравилось! Может кто-то, кто в Москве, захочет пойти завтра? Увы, у меня уже сложилось планы на субботу
❤3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @olgaponam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ольга Пономарева - ФМ и мягкие массажные техники” (@olgaponam), 106 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olgaponam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.