Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ОЛЬГА БАБУРА • ДНЕВНИК АКТРИСЫ И ЧЕЛОВЕКА

Channel

ОЛЬГА БАБУРА • ДНЕВНИК АКТРИСЫ И ЧЕЛОВЕКА

@olgababura

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

158subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002368047879
TypeChannel
Username@olgababura
DescriptionЛюблю обнимать, улыбать и вдохновлять, ваша актриса и человек Оля Бабура ✨ Полезные ссылки (агент, визитка, кинолифт, FilmToolz, Кино-Театр и др.): https://taplink.cc/olgababura Инстаграм: https://instagram.com/olkavit?utm_medium=copy_link
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/olgababura

Growth

158159158.57 Aug 2026, 14:08 — 159 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:30 — 158 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 18:00 — 158 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:088 Aug 2026, 18:00
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 158–159 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 18:00158no change
8 Aug 2026, 13:30158-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:08159first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 17 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.4%
avg views ÷ 158 subscribers
Avg views / post
73.3
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
29.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held13 (17 May 20265 August 2026)
Views total293
Reactions total87
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
339
Videos
137
Links
101

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 25s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

325 reactions across 13 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13842.5%
🔥4513.8%
❤‍🔥247.38%
👍144.31%
🥰144.31%
🤗134.00%
😍123.69%
🤩113.38%
👏103.08%
😁103.08%
51.54%
🤣51.54%
💘30.923%
😢30.923%
😱30.923%
🎉20.615%
🏆20.615%
👌20.615%
🕊20.615%
😘20.615%
5 further kinds51.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 325reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC41 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

7👍2🔥21❤‍🔥1🍓1👏1🤗1

4 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC52 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

9🔥5❤‍🔥2🤗2👍1🤩1🥰1😍1

2 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC70 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥6🤣53👍2😁2👏1🤗1🥰1

23 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC130 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🐸 Вот такой прикольный Reels, заряжающий на утверждения всех актеров, сделала Вероника. 🫶🫶 А, если Вы не актер, то просто зарядитесь хорошим настроением. 😍 Обнимаю вас всех 9 раз и пусть обязательно в ближайшее время с вами соучится какой-нибудь приятный сюрприз.

9❤‍🔥6🤗2😁21👍1💘1🔥1

8 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC177 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

9😁52👍2🔥2❤‍🔥1🤩1🥰1

26 Jun 2026, 14:58 UTC243 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

11🔥4👍2🤗2❤‍🔥1🥰1😁1

21 Jun 2026, 12:18 UTC279 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

18❤‍🔥4🤩4👏3🔥3🎉2😍2🥰1

12 Jun 2026, 14:55 UTC298 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😳 НЕУДАЧНЫЕ ПРОБЫ! Недавно я вам рассказывала про то, как со мной случились прекраснейшие пробы, но, к сожалению, в моей актёрской жизни были и неудачные, причём несколько раз. Сегодня расскажу про один такой случай. А на "как-нибудь потом" оставлю историю о том, как всё перевернулось с ног на голову, причём в прямом смысле. 😊 Помню, как несколько лет назад я захожу на пробы вся такая открытая, дружелюбная, всеми с

15😢3😱3😘2🤗1🤬1

9 Jun 2026, 12:16 UTC205 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kppforactorsVideo

👓 Дорогие актёры, если вдруг вы не видели выпуск подкаста "Борись и Раддуйся" с актрисой Наташей Земцовой, я очень советую. Наташа много говорила про кино, про свой путь. И благодаря таким интервью я понимаю, что у всех нас актеров одинаковые проблемы. После этого становится спокойнее. Я сразу чувствую, что не одна такая, есть много людей с похожими историями. И отношение к тебе не всегда зависит от твоего уровня ме

9🔥3❤‍🔥2👏2👍1🤗1🥰1🆒1

9 Jun 2026, 12:16 UTC127 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💙 На днях расскажу вам историю про мой неудачный поход на очные пробы несколько лет назад, после которых я восстанавливалась год. До сих пор внутри есть страх, что такое может повториться. Но одно я знаю точно, вести я себя буду уже по-другому. ✈️ А пока репост моего поста из группы КПП для актеров, вдруг кому-то будет полезно и интересно:

7👍3🤗3👌2

4 Jun 2026, 16:24 UTC196 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вчера ездила на очные пробы в Минск в проект для КИОН и официально заявляю, это были лучшие очные в моей жизни. ЭТО ТАКОЙ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🩷когда с тобой разговаривают; 🩵когда тебя слушают и слышат; ❤когда тебя и твоё видение уважают; 💙когда тебя направляют в местах, где можно сделать еще лучше, ведь со стороны виднее; 💗когда вы вместе находите новые решения сцены и персонажа; ❤когда пробы длятся час, а не 10 минут и "давайте

16🔥11❤‍🔥4🏆2🥰2😍21👏1

18 May 2026, 17:07 UTC219 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @talentSocialPhoto

Такое трогательное сообщение получили от Екатерины Семёновых. Спасибо ей огромное 🩷: Девочки, Ксюша и Оля! Честно, ломала голову, как написать вам обеим сразу, чтобы вы это увидели одновременно 😄 Поэтому пишу здесь — искала подходящий пост в канале ТГ, не нашла 😉 Вчера специально включила ваши серии «Детектива на все руки» — «Дело о потерянном счастье». И я просто в шоке. В самом хорошем смысле. Во-первых, видет

13🔥7🥰3👏2🤩2😍2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @olgababura. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ОЛЬГА БАБУРА • ДНЕВНИК АКТРИСЫ И ЧЕЛОВЕКА” (@olgababura), 158 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olgababura.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.