Channel
@olfilatova_design
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
387subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001249387404 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @olfilatova_design |
| Description | Я Оля – графический дизайнер. Делюсь своим опытом и историями о больном дизайнерском. Больше и интереснее: https://instagram.com/_olfilatova_ Подкаст «Без правочек»: https://olfilatova.mave.digital Мой сайт: https://olfilatova.ru По всем вопросам писать |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/olfilatova_design |
@olfilatova_design was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 387 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 387 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (27 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,678 |
| Reactions total | 198 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
198 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 104 | 52.5% | |
| 🔥 | 37 | 18.7% | |
| 💔 | 17 | 8.59% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 7.07% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 5.05% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 2.53% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 2.02% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 1.52% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.52% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.505% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 198reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
И знаете что? После того, как я наору на него матом, он делает то, что мне нужно Так что там говорили про то, что ИИшка - это такая волшебная вещь, которая не имеет эмоций? Как вы мне тогда объясните это явление, что только наорав он что-то понимает?
❤6
Меня довольно сложно вывести из себя, я в жизни не ругаюсь матом...Но во мне просыпается сатана, когда чат гпт не понимает меня из раза в раз и прям издевается надо мной. В этот момент я реально начинаю на него орать и писать матом и капсом
❤3💯3
Всё. Медведь отправился к Мише на покрытие лаком и увижу я его уже на выставке 25 сентября, где будет много медведей от разных художников P.S. Спам про зарубежных заказчиков, жду в комментах, ни в чём себе не отказывайте
❤14🔥7
Но медведь почти доделан https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbqKV0gM0aw/?igsh=YmpoMXh0cjQ2czFp
🔥10❤8
Video message, posted without a caption
❤5😢5
Делюсь тем, что устала
Video message, posted without a caption
💔9❤7
Video message, posted without a caption
💔8🙏1
Подруга прислала с Каннских Львов 🤩🤩🤩🤩
❤14❤🔥8
Заявляем, что двух точек над «Ё» оказалось мало. В этом году предлагаем не останавливаться и устроить точечное безумие. Объявляем традиционный конкурс буквы Ё, который проходит в нашей группе ВК. Стартуем 3 августа, приём работ до 27 сентября включительно, победители будут объявлены 10 октября. Все подробности по ссылке Ждём ваши Ё!
❤5
Друзья, умоляю Как перестать удивляться внутри каждый раз, когда кто-то выставляет нереально крутым особенным навыком подготовку файлов к печати? Ничего не могу с собой поделать, оно само из меня выливается) Скоро мы видимо докатимся до «умею открывать фотошоп, я крутой»
😁10👍3💯1
Разбирала балкон, перебрала свои некоторые институтские работы. Так я рисовала 15 лет назад Никогда эти работы не продам и не выкину. Они мне напоминают о том, сколько во мне всего заложено, какую свободу дали ещё тогда и что нельзя останавливаться. Теперь захотелось найти те, что не оформлены в рамы Жаль, что нет фоток моих лучших работ, которые забрали в фонд института
❤25❤🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @olfilatova_design. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Без правочек | Ольга Филатова” (@olfilatova_design), 387 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olfilatova_design.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.