Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Олег Коцарев. Тексти

Channel

Олег Коцарев. Тексти

@oleh_kotsarev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

306subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001373310311
TypeChannel
Username@oleh_kotsarev
Created3 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/oleh_kotsarev

Growth

3043063057 August 2026 — 304 subscribers8 August 2026 — 304 subscribers17 August 2026 — 306 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 10 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 304–306 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 10:25306+2
8 Aug 2026, 07:50304no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:56304first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.8%
avg views ÷ 306 subscribers
Avg views / post
66.8
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (25 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,336
Reactions total145
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

145 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10874.5%
🔥2416.6%
😁85.52%
🎉21.38%
👏10.69%
😱10.69%
🤩10.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC4 viewsread 8 August 2026

--- не меч а миру гострющий пластик світиться холодно сам-один серед ночі по той бік тіла річки тиша холодний подих загадки світла дорожчі за світло й не меч а любов: ґедзь на шиї лишив засос

7 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC29 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ГУЧНЕ УКРИТТЯ у темному коридорі стояти киця Понеділок прос[т]ити її на заходити до ванної бо там пра[ви]льна машина сну не в той бік крутити найгучнішим у світі носом

9

6 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC38 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

АМФІБІОНТНІСТЬ кузен купив равлик

4😁1

5 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC42 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

SORICIDAE IN RESERVATIONE BIOSPHAERICA CZORNOBYLENSI за розмірами та масою тіла білозубка мала поступається лише бурозубці малій КРИХІТНА АЛЕ НЕНАЖЕРЛИВА!!!

6🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC57 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ЗОЛОТИЙ ДОЩ НА ПОДОЛІ чи не в карнавал першопожовклого лисття серед трамвайного вензеля влучила блискавка? якщо мова про конденсацію слова про міні то чи має право Все закінчитись громадським добром а не фразою "я з'їло метро"? переступаю через ідею вікна на вулицю над волоссям галдіння Не_Наше лисття так на електризоване лисття з'їло метро

6

3 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC60 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

КАВ’ЯРНЯ БЕЗ СТОЛИКА Вулиця піднімалась угору, а назустріч сповзав столик геть зі своєї кав’ярні, даруючи деренчання павучиних ніжок ставкам вікон. Вище і вище, теплі кроки. Ось і дерево на фасаді навпроти, ось і рештки сонця в порожніх рамах, і в кутику дошки забута стара ціна. Усе тут, як і тоді, коли струм був підключений, все, як тоді — тільки кав’ярня сопе без столика, тільки не світиться маршрут.

4🔥2

2 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC63 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ТРИ РІЧКИ Я говорю про три річки міста. Вулиця розгортає обійми. І я бачу запах. Перша — це Харків, Лопань і Уди, не три окремі, але одна річка, як розкидана станція метро з трьома виходами; правда, й з різними кольорами: Харків — червона, Лопань — ультрасалатова, Уди — з чорною веною в центрі, в Удах-бо є щілина в піддійсність. Друга річка — Немишля, втеча дворами, недовірливий звір, м’яка помилка, за яку завтра

4🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC60 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сьогодні (неділя, 2 серпня) о 17-30 почитаю вірші в Анжелі на Літературнику Літа, який організувала Юля Петрук. Виступають: Юлія Петрук Олег Коцарев Павло Коробчук Вікторія Оліщук Дарина Чупат Андріана Кіндратович Френкі Фрейр Антон Полунін плюс вільний мікрофон проведемо залишки літа поетично вхід: посильний донат на потреби для підрозділу ББС «СТРІКС» 47 ОМБр

6

1 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC61 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ІНФУЗОР ДЕ Я? хата в лісі ніжкою тримається за за лізницю

4🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 20:27 UTC71 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

--- не хоче падать алича палає плащ на плечах вологі одиниці на язику текстурря це заборона памйятать що вечір

9🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC138 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Невеличкий огляд музики на вірші українських 1920-1930-х років для Читомо. Спочатку я сумнівався, чи братися за таке, а потім втягнувся. Звісно, це лише маленька часточка Всього. Але я намагався дати цікаві та контрастні штуки. Думаю, там є що послухати. https://chytomo.com/muzyka-na-virshi-1920-1930-kh-vid-sonorystyky-do-blek-metalu/

4🔥3👏1

30 Jul 2026, 20:37 UTC69 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

НЕ ЗАБУВАТИ АКАЦІЮ ось останні сто метрів перед парком ось трамвайний апогей via lucis via laetitiae у день на краєчку келиха тепла відкривається що відтепер Запахом Головним буде дух акації за парканом сміху в кінцевому персні трамвайному оточений танцем вагонів і ледь синкопованим твоїм кроком іти до сцени перехрестя й не забувати акацію хоч білу хоч рожеву моделювати в повітрі напій її запаху розміром з хмару

4🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @oleh_kotsarev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 796,889 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Олег Коцарев. Тексти” (@oleh_kotsarev), 306 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oleh_kotsarev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.