3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 401–436 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 16:48
432
+27
9 Aug 2026, 19:31
405
-1
9 Aug 2026, 09:16
406
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.3%
avg views ÷ 432 subscribers
Avg views / post
135
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
18 (2 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
1,218
Reactions total
85
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 07s
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
139 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
46
33.1%
❤
30
21.6%
👍
14
10.1%
😁
10
7.19%
🤩
9
6.47%
👏
7
5.04%
💯
6
4.32%
🎉
5
3.60%
🍾
3
2.16%
👌
3
2.16%
🏆
2
1.44%
😱
2
1.44%
⚡
1
0.719%
😨
1
0.719%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎤 ЗАРАБАТЫВАЕШЬ ГОЛОСОМ? ПРОВЕРЬ ЕГО, ПОКА НЕ ПОЗДНО
Ты — вокалист, педагог, оратор или ведущий? Твой голос это не просто дар, а РАБОЧИЙ ИНСТРУМЕНТ, который ежедневно испытывает колоссальные нагрузки.
Как и любой инструмент, голосовые связки имеют свойство изнашиваться. Но в отличие от гитары, их нельзя просто заменить.
🔍 КОГДА ПОРА К ВРАЧУ?
ФОНИАТР (именно так называется специалист по голосу) — это ваш главный с…
Школа Ораторов Олега Кота pinned «Раскрываю секреты речи, которая будет работать на вас! 3 бесплатных урока и моя личная обратная связь ждут именно вас»
🎤 ДЫХАНИЕ: мост между древней мудростью и наукой о голосе
Еще древние йоги знали: с каждым глубоким вдохом спинномозговая жидкость поднимается по позвоночнику, омывая шишковидную железу.
В 2015 году наука это подтвердила. Исследователи доказали: именно глубокий вдох — главный регулятор потока цереброспинальной жидкости в мозге. Выдох меняет направление потока, задержка — приостанавливает его. Дыхание буквально упра…
Коньяк «разогревает» связки? Миф из 90-х, который стоит вам голоса! 🎤🚫
Как педагог по вокалу и фонопедии, я каждый день вижу последствия этих заблуждений. ️
✖️Алкоголь сушит слизистую и «замораживает» болевые рецепторы Вы можете сорвать голос и даже не заметить этого во время выступления. ✖️ Кофеин обезвоживает
Густая слизь на голосовых складках заставляет вас перенапрягаться, отсюда и усталость голоса к вечеру.
✔…
🎤 БАЗА ораторского мастерства
Три правила, которые отделяют спикера, держащего зал, от того, кого слушают вполуха
Мы упаковали их для вас в карточки — максимально просто и доходчиво, с живыми примерами.
Листай карусель →
Здесь нет воды и сложных теорий. Только работающие приёмы:
✅ как захватить внимание за 7 секунд
✅ почему паузы сильнее слов
✅ как создать связь с залом без «смотрения поверх голов»
💾 Сохраняй, з…
Голосос, который не прЕдает, а прОдает! Или как Ариана Гранде промит помаду голосами Гарри Поттера 🪄
- Певица выдала гениальный ход — сняла рекламу своего бренда, озвучивая персонажей «Гарри Поттера» разными голосами. От Молли Уизли до Беллатрисы! Это не просто забавно — это мастер-класс по вокальному контролю.
Почему это гениально?
🎭 Она показала диапазон — за 60 секунд продемонстрировала 8+ разных голосовых красо…
Мы все живые люди. Или право преподавателя на «неидеальность» 🎭
Мы часто говорим о профессионализме. О том, что преподаватель или руководитель должен быть объективным, непредвзятым и всегда ровным. Должен ли его личный фон, настроение или усталость сказываться на учениках или подчиненных? Должны ли те, кто ведет за собой, быть стабильными, как скала, и являть собой безупречный пример?
Казалось бы, ответ лежит на по…
Мы:
Низкий голос — это ваш невидимый статус 🎙
Также мы, увидев это видео:
А что так можно было?! 😅
Оказывается, низкий регистр — это не только про уверенность, но и способ не остаться незамеченным даже среди селебрити!👆
Запишись на урок
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @olegkotschool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,221,063 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Школа Ораторов Олега Кота” (@olegkotschool), 432 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olegkotschool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.