Channel
@olegbroox
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
93subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002979553909 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @olegbroox |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/olegbroox |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 93 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 93 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
приветствую, сделал новую сборку с 7 скинами каст. все подробное вы увидите в видео. Так что не вижу смысла писать сюда текст что есть в моей сборке. https://t.me/KAMARAMODS https://t.me/KAMARAMODS https://t.me/KAMARAMODS 30 реакций слив
Signed камара
Ем
Signed камара
Т1 YAROSLAVL T2 TVER T2 VOLOGDA @potr00shitelb @toplistufa25 @topsindigo. Раскид 7+ чатов 25 тапов стоп
Signed камара
Фк на 🧸 (1) Условия: Подписка @tgkreuu Расскид 10-13 чатов Стоп 20 тапов Нет раскида - нет приза!
Signed камара
Фк на 5 призовых мест 1. Т10 Казани 2. Т10 Чоко 3. Т10 Ульяновск 4. Т11 Сургута 5. Мишка за 15 зв (Все топы сверху по дуэлям) Подписка на тгк: @KazanTops @PlachkaandKronos Лайк на видос в тт обязательно https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSCNk5HCR/ Раскид в 5+ чатов Итоги на 55 кликов
Signed камара
ЖИРНЫЙ ФК НА ЭТИ ТОПЫ: T2 YAROSLAVL T2 KURSK T2 RYAZAN T2 SAMARA T2 TOLYATTI T2 VOLOGDA РАСКИД 13+ ЧАТОВ сабка: @potr00shitelb @titlesarzamas стоп 45 тапов
Signed @kamarafuck
Фк на мишку раскид 5+ чатам стоп 25 тапоч
Signed @kamarafuck
фк на Т8 проэкта(10т1) условия: сабка: @xataberna @ProjectTitls раскид 17+чатов
Signed @kamarafuck
Фк на Т5 бс Азербайджана ( 1 т1 ) Условия подписку на @megatronepta Раскид 10+ чатов Стоп 40 тапов
Signed @kamarafuck
Фк на т4 Т5 т7 т9 Самары и голда Условия подписки на @vercettistack @m9nv33 Раскид 7+ чатов Стоп 30 тапов
Signed @kamarafuck
Фк на т4 Т5 т7 т9 Самары и голда Условия подписки на @vercettistack @m9nv33 Раскид 7+ чатов Стоп 30 тапов
Signed @kamarafuck
Фк на мишку Условия - KENZOIZBLOODOV ТАПОВ - 15
Signed @kamarafuck
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @olegbroox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,211,136 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@olegbroox named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᴄᴀʀʀʏ#ᴄʀᴜᴇʟ❄️” (@olegbroox), 93 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olegbroox.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.