Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Олег Щеглов

Channel

Олег Щеглов

@oleg_sheglov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

908subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001349202393
TypeChannel
Username@oleg_sheglov
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oleg_sheglov

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

908923915.56 August 2026 — 923 subscribers6 August 2026 — 923 subscribers7 August 2026 — 920 subscribers15 August 2026 — 916 subscribers29 August 2026 — 915 subscribers8 September 2026 — 909 subscribers17 September 2026 — 908 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 906–925 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 09:16908-1
8 Sept 2026, 10:35909-6
29 Aug 2026, 12:24915-1
15 Aug 2026, 00:35916-4
7 Aug 2026, 19:52920-3
6 Aug 2026, 23:16923no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:04923first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 6 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

227 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁10445.8%
6126.9%
🔥3113.7%
😱167.05%
😭73.08%
🍌52.20%
🗿31.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 227 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
37
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 15 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @oleg_sheglov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 February 2026 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC211 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Совсем железяки от рук отбились

😁8

3 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTC459 views21 reactions8 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

А у вас что происходит?

😁136😱2

6 Jun 2026, 12:30 UTC491 views15 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

Нам тут оно моё не надо.

😁9🔥6

24 May 2026, 11:39 UTC643 views7 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Video

Или вы против детей???

😭5🍌1😁1

15 May 2026, 09:36 UTC692 views12 reactions10 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

Это единственное, что помогло, спасибо! 🖤

😁6🔥4😭2

13 May 2026, 08:03 UTC630 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Важное объявление👆🏾

😁91

3 May 2026, 13:52 UTC680 views15 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

Не благодарите🫶🏽

😁86🗿1

10 Apr 2026, 11:12 UTC880 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

😁😆😁 хлеб, сосиски, молоко, бинтик

😁136🗿2🍌1

2 Mar 2026, 08:42 UTC≈1,090 views15 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

Нижегородский дон-ремонта знает о проблеме еще до того, как у вас что то сломалось 💪

12🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @oleg_sheglov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Олег Щеглов” (@oleg_sheglov), 908 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oleg_sheglov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.