Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Олег Остроумов – работа и жизнь

Channel

Олег Остроумов – работа и жизнь

@oleg_ostroumov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

775subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001896502688
TypeChannel
Username@oleg_ostroumov
Created22 January 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oleg_ostroumov

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 35% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

775776775.56 August 2026 — 776 subscribers6 August 2026 — 776 subscribers14 August 2026 — 775 subscribers21 August 2026 — 776 subscribers14 September 2026 — 775 subscribers6 August 202614 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 39 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 775–776 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 03:36775-1
21 Aug 2026, 14:06776+1
14 Aug 2026, 00:58775-1
6 Aug 2026, 15:37776no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:33776first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 22 January 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

356 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥22362.6%
👍8824.7%
215.90%
❤‍🔥82.25%
👎71.97%
🆒51.40%
🖕20.562%
🗿10.281%
🤗10.281%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 356 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2023 to 5 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Nov 2025, 15:12 UTC≈1,000 views48 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я тут присоединился на роль СТО в гемблинговый стартап (пока в стелс-режиме). Последние 2 недели испытываю приятное чувство компетентности, тут куча идей и ресурсов, и я хорошо справляюсь. Честно говоря, я зарастал мхом последние, кхм, годы. Рад что наконец взялся за работу на 100%. Организовывать людей, договариваться с партнерами, разбираться в новом, иметь цель - это шикарно. Работать - сильно лучше, чем ютуб смот

🔥22❤‍🔥8👎7👍43🖕2🗿1🤗1

17 Jan 2025, 23:40 UTC≈3,220 views45 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Опубликовал историю, как я создал дро солвер, заработал свой первый миллион долларов, и как мы обыграли Фила Айви. Пока на английском https://medium.com/@olegostroumov/how-i-made-my-first-million-and-took-down-phil-ivey-along-the-way-story-of-draw-solver-8473fb0582ff

🔥37👍8

2 Apr 2024, 09:42 UTC≈11,400 views43 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Мы выложили солвер для китайского покера, Open Face Chinese Pineapple Раньше солвер был доступен только избранным клиентам по $30k+, а теперь он доступен для всех. Поддерживаются разновидности Classic, Progressive, Ultimate, с джокерами и без. Против него можно играть, и конструировать ситуации вручную. Работает через браузер на десктопе. Веб-интерфейс на стадии беты. Решения оптимальные (в бесплатной версии не-

🔥31👍111

11 Apr 2023, 17:41 UTC≈3,770 views108 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Завтра я читаю лекцию в DeepMind в Лондоне. DeepMind – это лаборатория искусственного интеллекта. Они создали программу AlphaGo, обыгравшую сильнейшего человека в го в 2016 (в шахматы IBM обыграли Каспарова в 1997), обыграли человека в Старкрафт, и недавно еще создали AlphaCode, которая решает задачи по олимпиадной информатике на уровне продвинутого школьника. Основатель DeepMind, Демис Хассабис, обожает игры, и до

🔥76👍216🆒5

22 Jan 2023, 11:50 UTC≈8,440 views99 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Всем привет! Проект, которым я больше всего горжусь – создание программы для вычисления оптимальной стратегии в покере, так называемого “равновесия Нэша”. В начале 2013 года я в одиночку написал программу, которая вычисляет равновесие Нэша для самой популярной разновидность покера — No-Limit Holdem. Но сделать программу и выгодно продать ее — две разные задачи. В своей первой статье я рассказываю, как размышлял над

🔥57👍3111

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @oleg_ostroumov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Олег Остроумов – работа и жизнь” (@oleg_ostroumov), 775 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oleg_ostroumov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.