Channel
@oldmengames
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
125subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001345252395 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oldmengames |
| Description | Немного про игры, старые и новые. Плюс нытьё про то, что раньше было лучше. |
| Created | 18 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oldmengames |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 125 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 125 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 10 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
71 reactions across 13 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 12 | 16.9% | |
| 🫡 | 9 | 12.7% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 11.3% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 7.04% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 7.04% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 7.04% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 5.63% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 5.63% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 4.23% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 4.23% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 4.23% | |
| 🥱 | 3 | 4.23% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 1.41% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 1.41% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 1.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2025 to 16 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Надо было еще две недели назад написать, но случился отпуск и как-то руки не доходили. Но в любом случае про Doom: The Dark Ages написать стоит. Тем более что этот пост станет завершающим в этом канале. Но об этом чуть позже. А новый думец, надо сказать, действительно неплох. Вот именно "неплох", а не "хорош" или "воу, пушка". Неплох. Это пока всё ещё соло-на-клавиатуре, но уже не в таком дурном темпе. Стреляется о…
🫡9💔4
А говорили, что DOOM больше не похож на Super Mario Bros.
😁5🙈1
Габен близок к тому, чтобы подвинуть винду на пьедестале домашних операционок. Пока ещё официальная позиция звучит как "Однако SteamOS не стоит рассматривать как замену операционной системы для ПК.", но складывается ощущение, что так будет не всегда. Буквально лет десять назад о подобном было трудно думать, хотя и существовала уже первая версия SteamOS на базе дебиана. Она даже кое-как работала. Что будет ещё через д…
🤔1
Смотрел трейлер Critical Shift и вспомнил сразу GORKY 17
🎂 А ведь сегодня юбилей телепередачи "От винта!" Ровно 30 лет назад, в 08:50 в субботу 20 мая 1995 года в эфире канала РТР впервые появились ведущие с позывными Бонус и Гамовер, которые рассказывали об увлекательном мире видеоигр. В первый выпуск попали Wolfenstein 3D и Master of Orion. А потом были Doom и Doom 2, Mortal Kombat и Heretic, Full Throttle и многие другие хиты, ставшие легендами. Которые невозможно забыт…
🥰7🔥3
Правда, если будет таким же как ремастер Amerzone… На ps5 он играется совершенно ужасно.
Анонсирован ремастер первой Syberia | https://stopgame.ru/newsdata/66935
❤2
Black Myth: Wukong прекрасная игра. Но, к сожалению, я не такой прекрасный игрок. Великолепное приключение в красивейших декорациях с интересными персонажами. Своеобразная, но адекватная, боёвка. Слишком медленная для такой игры, на мой взгляд (невозможность отменить анимацию иногда просто разрывает седалище), но, в целом, привыкнуть можно. Огромный бестиарий, где у каждого, даже самого мелкого противника, есть своя…
👏3🔥1
Спустя 21 год на ПК в Steam выпустили «Приключения Капитана Блада» — пиратский боевик получил 46 баллов на OpenCritic Проект «Приключения Капитана Блада» спустя много лет всё же смогли довести до релиза.
🎉5🤡1
К сожалению, не понимаю хайпа вокруг Экспедиции 33.
😁5🌚2🤡2
Беседка, как всегда, выдаёт продукт своего уровня. Казалось бы, хрен с ней, с этой производительностью ремастера Oblivion, но можно, хотя бы, не ломать то, что и так нормально работает в стиме? Умудрились сломать облачные сохранения, в итоге зелёная галочка полной поддержки стимдека не имеет никакого смысла. Сейвы между компом и портативкой не синхронизируются 😡
😢3😁2
Photo, posted without a caption
🤯5🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @oldmengames. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 915,563 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Игры стариков” (@oldmengames), 125 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oldmengames.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.