Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @oksana_pavliuk_li — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -5,189. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,738–16,483 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 12:55
10,516
-1,142
19 Sept 2026, 15:40
11,658
-102
17 Sept 2026, 01:18
11,760
-93
15 Sept 2026, 05:18
11,853
-104
13 Sept 2026, 11:37
11,957
-851
11 Sept 2026, 17:56
12,808
-138
9 Sept 2026, 03:37
12,946
-777
5 Sept 2026, 19:56
13,723
-51
3 Sept 2026, 16:00
13,774
-84
2 Sept 2026, 07:43
13,858
-56
1 Sept 2026, 09:26
13,914
-132
31 Aug 2026, 11:44
14,046
-353
30 Aug 2026, 11:03
14,399
-119
29 Aug 2026, 09:03
14,518
-84
28 Aug 2026, 06:02
14,602
-25
27 Aug 2026, 04:39
14,627
-33
26 Aug 2026, 02:59
14,660
-29
25 Aug 2026, 05:48
14,689
-47
24 Aug 2026, 06:58
14,736
-70
22 Aug 2026, 15:32
14,806
first reading
Engagement
64 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 10,516 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,450
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 64 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
64 (31 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
8,680
Reactions total
568
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 19:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
22m 03s
Average length
3m 41s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,498 reactions across 58 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,001
44.5%
💯
1,628
36.2%
👍
465
10.3%
🔥
319
7.09%
🥰
46
1.02%
💋
30
0.667%
🙏
4
0.089%
🕊
2
0.044%
⚡
1
0.022%
👌
1
0.022%
👏
1
0.022%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,498 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 60 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @oksana_pavliuk_li. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 64 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Коли гроші асоціюються з великою відповідальністю, тривогою та страхом втрати, вони підсвідомо сприймаються не як ресурс, а як загроза.
У такому стані ми самі блокуємо їхній приплив, оскільки наш мозок прагне захистити нас від зайвого напруження.
Щоб змінити взаємини з фінансами та дати їм можливість увійти у ваше життя, важливо звернути увагу на такі внутрішні механізми:
🚨Зміна внутрішніх програм та установок
Б…
План порятунку нервової системи у батьків і дітей з початком навчального року.
Зараз головне завдання — вижити і адаптуватися. Почніть з жорсткої реставрації фізичного здоров’я. Необхідно терміново вирівняти режим сну: дитина має засинати в один і той же час, в повній темряві та прохолоді, причому цей час має забезпечувати мінімум 9-10 годин повноцінного сну. Налагодьте регулярне, поживне харчування, багате на білки…
Хочу показати вам практику, роблячи яку, ви зможете усунути біль у попереку, біль у скронях та головний біль, зняти бруксизм та спазм щелепи, що виникають на фоні спазму діафрагми турецького сідла.
У нашому тілі все взаємопов'язане через м'язи, фасціальні ланцюги та єдину тверду мозкову оболонку (ТМО), яка тягнеться від черепа до самого крижа. У цьому процесі беруть участь 4 ключові діафрагми:
Діафрагма турецького …
Ви знаєте, ще багато разів вам скажу одне і теж: «лікується будь-яка хвороба, але не будь-яка людина».
Щоб мати ресурс і вільний потенціал енергії на зцілення потрібно дозволити собі бути здоровим.
Коли я тестую людей на три питання через мʼязово фасціальний тест, ніколи не бачила, щоб всі три були «так».
Є три запитання:
- я хочу бути здоровою
- я можу бути здоровою
- я дозволяю бути здоровою
І у 80% людей, треті…
🚨Друзі всі наші з вами зустрічі в Івано-Франківську на сьогодні відмінюються, через колапс в Києві.
Хто не знає, там повний збій Укрзалізниці через масовані обстріли і тривогу, яка майже постійно.
Але я вже їду.
Тому у всіх проектах і на особистих прийомах, зустрінемося з понеділка.
Для тих, хто планує попасти на прийом, плануйте заздалегідь. Пишіть в нашу службу турботи @Pavliuk_Consultation
Аутизм — це не вирок, а діагноз, з яким можна й потрібно працювати
Коли батьки чують діагноз «аутизм», світ часто рушиться в одну мить. Здається, що попереду лише невизначеність, біль та ізоляція. Проте історія багатьох сімей доводить: боротися варто завжди, а за складними симптомами нервової системи нерідко ховаються біологічні процеси в організмі.
Як починається регресивна форма?
Більшість випадків розладів аути…
Все що ви можете подарувати собі - це правильний стан.
Давайте розберемося, що це таке і чому я дійсно часто про це згадую.
Чоловіки та жінки все ж таки відрізняються: для чоловіка насамперед важлива дія, для жінки насамперед — стан.
Її стан визначатиме те, як вона житиме.
Більше того, це дуже цікаво: жіночий стан, стан жінки, її внутрішній світ, якщо хочете, визначає те, як живе її сім'я — наскільки багато вній …
На школу дітям
Ми можемо допомогти сьогодні тим, хто ще маленькі і ще не усвідомлють чого зараз у них немає що їсти, чому немає зошитів і ручок.
🔗Посилання на Банку
https://send.monobank.ua/jar/6ZKgjxUGqw
💳Номер картки Банки
4874 1000 3184 5194
Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @oksana_pavliuk_li. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Анна Ефремова | экстрасенс @EfremovaAnna · 28,984 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pavliuk Oksana / ПРОСТІР ТВОРЦЯ” (@oksana_pavliuk_li), 10,516 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oksana_pavliuk_li.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
