Как голосует молодёжь, глазами старых политиков!
😁7👍3🔥2👏1🤩1🥰1

Channel
@okroshka_na_belom
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
209subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001508982818 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @okroshka_na_belom |
| Created | 20 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/okroshka_na_belom |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 209 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:14 | 212 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 210 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 211 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 211 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
174 reactions across 19 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 23 | 13.2% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 13.2% | |
| 🤬 | 23 | 13.2% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 5.75% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 5.75% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 5.17% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 5.17% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 4.60% | |
| 💩 | 8 | 4.60% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 4.02% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 3.45% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 3.45% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 3.45% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 2.87% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 2.30% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 2.30% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 1.72% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.15% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 1.15% | |
| 🤷♂ | 2 | 1.15% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 2.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2022 to 5 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как голосует молодёжь, глазами старых политиков!
😁7👍3🔥2👏1🤩1🥰1
"Нетипичный гастротур" под ритмы Виталия Бо Валигуры. Совместно с Андреем Лушниковым (1586), Евгением Матусевичем (Сеновал) , Константином Ключниковым (#Москва), Еленой Медведевой (El Chico), Дмитрием Выродовым (Кухмистер). Смотрим.
❤3👏3🏆1🥰1
30 мая день рождения Окрошки! Год назад по итогам опроса окрошку готовили 38% на красном квасе, 20% на кефире и 16% на белом квасе. А на чём нынче Вы готовите окрошку?
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤🔥9🔥5🥰5👍1
📍 Куда уходит молодёжь из Воронежа? Все прекрасно знают, что столица Черноземья – город молодёжи, но даже в этом городе миллионике становиться многим тесно. Куда же уходит из Воронежа молодёжь? 🔎 Например Алексей Рвачёв, выходец из детского движения Воронежской области. Был в педотряде ЦИТ, работал во Всероссийском детском центре «Орлёнок». Имея такой педагогический багаж был приглашён работать в фонд «Капитаны», г…
🔥6❤1👍1💯1🤔1🤝1
🇷🇺 Поддержи парней, что стоят за тебя! Помоги ближайшей волонтерской организации!
🏆 Отмечаем нашу первую 1000 подписчиков! Канал Brief.Центр постепенно обрастает не только читателями, но и дружественными каналами-партнерами, среди которых мы особо хотим отметить: Старшего брата – самый читаемый российский канал Brief, на который мы не просто ровняемся, а который вдохновил нас на системную работу в ЦФО Совесть губернаторов – федеральный канал, который читают многие главы субъектов Клуб регионов …
👍5🔥2❤1💯1
❗️❗️❗️ Украинский 200 тысячный контингент формируется для атаки на Белгород В сети появилось видео, где создатель ЧВК «Вагнер» господин Пригожин общается с военкорами и блогерами. По его словам, ВСУ получили большое количество техники НАТО и планируют по весне, когда подсохла почва и можно гонять по полям, делать прорывы. Одной из основных целей, со слов Пригожина, будет являться прорыв на белгородском направлении…
🤬3👍1💋1💩1😢1
Как считаете, есть у молодого воронежского Сокола Жириновского шанс победить на открытых выборах мэра Москвы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
💩2🤣2🤡1
🆕 Воронежец поборется в открытых выборах за пост мэра Москвы Уроженец столицы Черноземья, 31-летний Борис Чернышов уже в сентябре поборется за пост главы столицы нашего государства! Борис является сейчас вице-спикером Государственной Думы и одним из последних приближённых Соколов Жириновского. Поэтому логично, что такую хоть и молодую, но уже статусную личность в ЛДПР могут спокойно выставить против действующего мэ…
🔥4👍2🤣2🤷♂2👏1🤡1
😇 В Воронеже выбрали нового мэра Ну как выбрали, ну как нового! Сегодня не избиратели на участках, а Воронежская городская дума в жесточайшей борьбе выбирали из двух кандидатов на пост нового сити-менеджера столицы Черноземья. Со счёт 28 : 0 победил действующий глава Вадим Кстенин. 😅 Забавно, что кое-кто успел написать (но уже удалил), что было 30 депутатов и типо двоим не досталось бюллетеней. В любом случае с ч…
🤣5😁1
📍 На Тамбовщине начались отставки глав администраций После успешной победы Максима Егорова на выборах в главы Тамбовской области, набрав практически 85% поддержки, он с полным правом начал потихонечку обновлять команду в регионе. 🏬💊 С формулировкой по состоянию здоровья в отставку уходит глава администрации Рассказово Алексей Колмаков. Колмаков руководит Рассказово с 2010 года, до этого успел поработать начальнико…
👍2👎1👏1🤣1
🌳🚜 В Воронеже во благо строительного клана уничтожают памятник природы Под предлогом строительства бесполезной дороги Шишкова-Тимирязева, начали уничтожать деревья в природоохранной зоне. На видео видно, что за охранной табличкой уже завалили лес. Жители говорят, что этот участок не должен был быть затронут. 📞 Что скажут в Управление Росприроднадзора, которое никак не реагирует на очередное издевательство во благо…
👎4💩3🤬2😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @okroshka_na_belom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
30 мая день рождения Окрошки! Год назад по итогам опроса окрошку готовили 38% на красном квасе, 20% на кефире и 16% на белом квасе. А на чём нынче Вы готовите окрошку?
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как считаете, есть у молодого воронежского Сокола Жириновского шанс победить на открытых выборах мэра Москвы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2022 to 5 March 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@okroshka_na_belom named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Окрошка на белом квасе” (@okroshka_na_belom), 209 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/okroshka_na_belom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.