Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Окрошка на белом квасе

Channel

Окрошка на белом квасе

@okroshka_na_belom

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

209subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001508982818
TypeChannel
Username@okroshka_na_belom
Created20 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/okroshka_na_belom

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

209212210.56 August 2026 — 211 subscribers7 August 2026 — 211 subscribers29 August 2026 — 210 subscribers4 September 2026 — 212 subscribers13 September 2026 — 209 subscribers6 August 202613 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 38 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 209–212 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 06:16209-3
4 Sept 2026, 18:14212+2
29 Aug 2026, 01:17210-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:33211no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:57211first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 November 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

174 reactions across 19 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2313.2%
🔥2313.2%
🤬2313.2%
😁105.75%
🤣105.75%
95.17%
❤‍🔥95.17%
👏84.60%
💩84.60%
🥰74.02%
🕊63.45%
😱63.45%
🤯63.45%
👎52.87%
😢42.30%
🤔42.30%
🤡31.72%
💯21.15%
🤨21.15%
🤷‍♂21.15%
4 further kinds42.30%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2022 to 5 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Mar 2024, 21:23 UTC≈1,720 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Как голосует молодёжь, глазами старых политиков!

😁7👍3🔥2👏1🤩1🥰1

13 Jan 2024, 09:34 UTC≈1,730 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @slabunovanesprosiliVideo

"Нетипичный гастротур" под ритмы Виталия Бо Валигуры. Совместно с Андреем Лушниковым (1586), Евгением Матусевичем (Сеновал) , Константином Ключниковым (#Москва), Еленой Медведевой (El Chico), Дмитрием Выродовым (Кухмистер). Смотрим.

3👏3🏆1🥰1

30 May 2023, 10:05 UTC≈2,690 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

30 мая день рождения Окрошки! Год назад по итогам опроса окрошку готовили 38% на красном квасе, 20% на кефире и 16% на белом квасе. А на чём нынче Вы готовите окрошку?

  1. На белом квасе40%
  2. На кефире26%
  3. На тане12%
  4. На красном квасе18%
  5. На минералке9%
  6. Я не ем окрошку, но интересен результат12%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤‍🔥9🔥5🥰5👍1

24 May 2023, 11:16 UTC≈2,100 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📍 Куда уходит молодёжь из Воронежа? Все прекрасно знают, что столица Черноземья – город молодёжи, но даже в этом городе миллионике становиться многим тесно. Куда же уходит из Воронежа молодёжь? 🔎 Например Алексей Рвачёв, выходец из детского движения Воронежской области. Был в педотряде ЦИТ, работал во Всероссийском детском центре «Орлёнок». Имея такой педагогический багаж был приглашён работать в фонд «Капитаны», г

🔥61👍1💯1🤔1🤝1

8 Apr 2023, 15:50 UTC≈1,780 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🇷🇺 Поддержи парней, что стоят за тебя! Помоги ближайшей волонтерской организации!

27 Mar 2023, 06:35 UTC≈1,640 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @brief_cfo

🏆 Отмечаем нашу первую 1000 подписчиков! Канал Brief.Центр постепенно обрастает не только читателями, но и дружественными каналами-партнерами, среди которых мы особо хотим отметить: Старшего брата – самый читаемый российский канал Brief, на который мы не просто ровняемся, а который вдохновил нас на системную работу в ЦФО Совесть губернаторов – федеральный канал, который читают многие главы субъектов Клуб регионов

👍5🔥21💯1

24 Mar 2023, 08:45 UTC≈1,460 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

❗️❗️❗️ Украинский 200 тысячный контингент формируется для атаки на Белгород В сети появилось видео, где создатель ЧВК «Вагнер» господин Пригожин общается с военкорами и блогерами. По его словам, ВСУ получили большое количество техники НАТО и планируют по весне, когда подсохла почва и можно гонять по полям, делать прорывы. Одной из основных целей, со слов Пригожина, будет являться прорыв на белгородском направлении

🤬3👍1💋1💩1😢1

22 Mar 2023, 13:27 UTC865 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Как считаете, есть у молодого воронежского Сокола Жириновского шанс победить на открытых выборах мэра Москвы?

  1. Возможна победа за воронежцем Борисом Чернышовым из ЛДПР26%
  2. Нет. Победа будет за действующим мэром Москвы Сергеем Собяненым74%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💩2🤣2🤡1

22 Mar 2023, 13:24 UTC≈2,330 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🆕 Воронежец поборется в открытых выборах за пост мэра Москвы Уроженец столицы Черноземья, 31-летний Борис Чернышов уже в сентябре поборется за пост главы столицы нашего государства! Борис является сейчас вице-спикером Государственной Думы и одним из последних приближённых Соколов Жириновского. Поэтому логично, что такую хоть и молодую, но уже статусную личность в ЛДПР могут спокойно выставить против действующего мэ

🔥4👍2🤣2🤷‍♂2👏1🤡1

22 Mar 2023, 08:19 UTC713 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😇 В Воронеже выбрали нового мэра Ну как выбрали, ну как нового! Сегодня не избиратели на участках, а Воронежская городская дума в жесточайшей борьбе выбирали из двух кандидатов на пост нового сити-менеджера столицы Черноземья. Со счёт 28 : 0 победил действующий глава Вадим Кстенин. 😅 Забавно, что кое-кто успел написать (но уже удалил), что было 30 депутатов и типо двоим не досталось бюллетеней. В любом случае с ч

🤣5😁1

21 Mar 2023, 08:45 UTC587 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📍 На Тамбовщине начались отставки глав администраций После успешной победы Максима Егорова на выборах в главы Тамбовской области, набрав практически 85% поддержки, он с полным правом начал потихонечку обновлять команду в регионе. 🏬💊 С формулировкой по состоянию здоровья в отставку уходит глава администрации Рассказово Алексей Колмаков. Колмаков руководит Рассказово с 2010 года, до этого успел поработать начальнико

👍2👎1👏1🤣1

15 Mar 2023, 08:36 UTC560 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🌳🚜 В Воронеже во благо строительного клана уничтожают памятник природы Под предлогом строительства бесполезной дороги Шишкова-Тимирязева, начали уничтожать деревья в природоохранной зоне. На видео видно, что за охранной табличкой уже завалили лес. Жители говорят, что этот участок не должен был быть затронут. 📞 Что скажут в Управление Росприроднадзора, которое никак не реагирует на очередное издевательство во благо

👎4💩3🤬2😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @okroshka_na_belom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 May 2023, 10:05 UTCAnonymous Poll297 voters

30 мая день рождения Окрошки! Год назад по итогам опроса окрошку готовили 38% на красном квасе, 20% на кефире и 16% на белом квасе. А на чём нынче Вы готовите окрошку?

  1. На белом квасе40%
  2. На кефире26%
  3. На тане12%
  4. На красном квасе18%
  5. На минералке9%
  6. Я не ем окрошку, но интересен результат12%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Mar 2023, 13:27 UTCAnonymous Poll39 voters

Как считаете, есть у молодого воронежского Сокола Жириновского шанс победить на открытых выборах мэра Москвы?

  1. Возможна победа за воронежцем Борисом Чернышовым из ЛДПР26%
  2. Нет. Победа будет за действующим мэром Москвы Сергеем Собяненым74%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2022 to 5 March 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Окрошка на белом квасе” (@okroshka_na_belom), 209 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/okroshka_na_belom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.