Теперь окончательно все! Ответы на 2026 год больше не сливаем, по поводу следующего года напишем позже. Всем спасибо кто выбрал нас ❤️
custom 53887902567723314428

Channel
@okolite
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
143subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002768993441 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @okolite |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/okolite |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 143 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:59 | 145 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:21 | 149 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 149 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
91 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5388790256772331442 | 43 | 47.3% | |
| custom 5253700530152165989 | 16 | 17.6% | |
| custom 5206607081334906820 | 14 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5235734037707898372 | 8 | 8.79% | |
| custom 5258171148725662540 | 7 | 7.69% | |
| custom 5456140674028019486 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| custom 5210956306952758910 | 1 | 1.10% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @okolite. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 June 2026 to 7 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Теперь окончательно все! Ответы на 2026 год больше не сливаем, по поводу следующего года напишем позже. Всем спасибо кто выбрал нас ❤️
custom 53887902567723314428
Купить ответы на пересдачу - @sweod
Математику слили успешно! Следующие даты для пересдач: 29 июня — математика 2 июля — русский 3 и 6 июля — все остальные предметы Купить ответы на пересдачу - @sweod
custom 52357340377078983724custom 53887902567723314422custom 54561406740280194862
Sticker, posted without a caption
ГВЭ так же продаём.
@sweod - купить пересдачи по ОГЭ можете тут ❤️
ВСЕ КТО КУПИЛ ОТВЕТЫ НА ПЕРЕСДАЧУ В ЛС - @sweod
custom 52537005301521659893custom 52581711487256625402
Ответы на пересдачу вы можете приобрести - @sweod Подробнее объясню там же
custom 52537005301521659892
Зовите друзей, кому в следующем году выпал шанс сдать основной государственный экзамен. В этом году супер слабенький активчик, если сравнивать с 2025 годом. В пике 1500 сабов, причем тут в пике было всего 300😄 Отзывы 2026: https://t.me/otvoke випка стоила 200 рублей все предметы
custom 52066070813349068203
Остаемся на 2027 год?
custom 520660708133490682011custom 52109563069527589101
ЕГЭ по арабскому языку: в Рособрнадзоре назвали сроки введения нового экзамена Ранее глава Минпросвещения Сергей Кравцов утвердил программу изучения арабского языка в российских школах с 1 сентября нового учебного года. Однако выпускникам, желающим сдать по нему госэкзамен, придётся набраться терпения — до этого момента пройдёт почти десять лет. Как сообщает РИА Новости, сдавать арабский в качестве ЕГЭ разрешат не …
custom 52581711487256625405
Вот и мы подошли к концу. История получилась супер хорошая, ведь в этом году все получили ответы намного раньше, чем это было в прошлом году. Спасибо всем, кто доверился и приобрёл вип-канал. Старались порадовать вас полными материалами, второй частью и распределениями. Ждём вас с новостями о ваших достижениях у нас в чате. https://t.me/okolite_chat
custom 538879025677233144212
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @okolite. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 391,952 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@okolite named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OKO | ОТВЕТЫ ОГЭ 2026” (@okolite), 143 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/okolite.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.