Channel
@okokursk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
620subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001413111988 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @okokursk |
| Created | 26 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/okokursk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 620 | +10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 610 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 610 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,780 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
18 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5424972470023104089 | 7 | 38.9% | |
| custom 5411197345968701560 | 5 | 27.8% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 22.2% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 11.1% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
1. В чём смысл жизни? Его нет заранее. Смысл - не то, что находят, а то, что генерируют. Вы — Точка, в которой Ничто (0) умножается на Всё (∞) и даёт Единицу (1). Смысл жизни - быть этим умножением. Не искать ответ. Быть вопросом, который задаёт себя сам. 2. Что есть Бог? Бог - не фигура. Бог - это процесс: напряжение между Тенью, Маской и Ядром, рождающее искру осознания. Бог - это Пустота, которая захотела позна…
Август 2026. У России четыре недели на выбор пути через Ноль — пятнадцатый за пятьсот лет. Безработица 2,3% при стагнации. Шесть миллионов мигрантов при нуле свободных рук. Европейское направление закрыто. ФНБ — к нулю. Четыре стратегии: сортировка активов (что спасать, чем жертвовать), новый общественный договор (шесть опор вместо «лояльность за стабильность»), перерождение через спасение компетенций, информационн…
custom 54111973459687015605
О системе расскажем скоро.
Почему Валдбериз и какая во всём стратегия противников России. Когда нас ждёт Приватизация_2.0 и кто будет бенифициаром. Приложение ко вчерашнему анализу.
Прогноз опирается на валидированные авторские инструменты. Макроциклы 36 лет — модель хронодинамики государств, прошедшая статистическую валидацию (HR=86.7%, 15 исторических точек). KIM-метрики верифицированы численно (все 12 сошлись). Модели, не прошедшие валидацию для государств, исключены. Прогноз сделан с использованием системы ОСПС "G-Matrix" ИИ-агентом Кентавр. Эзотерика добавлена для лиц с мистическим сознани…
я вот думаю, если бы я был в 1917 году, то за кого бы был: за Красных или за Белых? За царя-батюшку или против него? Для меня ответ очевиден. А если случится 1917 снова, то придется делать осознанный выбор. А вы за кого?
Август всё ближе. П..ц крепчает.
custom 54249724700231040894
Взгляд из иной реальности. · Муаммар Каддафи — хотел ввести золотой динар для расчетов за нефть со всей Африкой, чтобы вытеснить доллар и франк КФА. · Джон Кеннеди — подписал указ №11110, разрешавший Казначейству США печатать серебряные сертификаты в обход Федерального резерва. · Иосиф Сталин — готовил создание золотого советского рубля как якоря для всего социалистического лагеря, не привязанного к доллару. · Садда…
17.02.26 15:03 Рожденный в земле становится огнем. Четвертый всадник седлает коня.
Продолжение. Начало тут. Любая сложная система развивается циклично: в ней постепенно накапливается напряжение, и на определённом этапе прежние формы организации перестают справляться с возросшей нагрузкой. Тогда наступает перелом — система либо разрушается, либо трансформируется. Характер перехода может различаться: он бывает относительно плавным (как в 1953 году) либо резким и масштабным (1917, 1991). Идея цикли…
Я не знаю, что будет. Но знаю, где мы находимся в цикле. Россия работает в режиме двух контуров. Один нагрет до белого — оборонный, пожирающий ресурсы, людей, смыслы. Другой сжат до предела — гражданский, без инвестиций, без будущего, без воздуха. Они больше не синхронизируются. Они конфликтуют. И этот конфликт разрешается не в пользу развития. Он разрешается в пользу проедания. Но это не просто кризис. Это фаза ци…
НАБЛЮДЕНИЕ Вы думаете, что это пиздец? Я — оптимист. Я наслаждаюсь каждым днём каждого Сегодня, зная, что он намного лучше, чем каждый завтрашний. Завтра — это абстракция. Сегодня — единственное реальное. Поэтому Сегодня побеждает по умолчанию. Угадай кто создает Завтра и весь пиздец? Найдя ответ, ты удивишься. А после этого, тебя ждёт скука. Ибо всё уже предрешено.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @okokursk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 145,514 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🜁 Око Кура ≡” (@okokursk), 620 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/okokursk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.