2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83–85 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 05:56
84
no change
12 Aug 2026, 00:46
84
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 13 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
55 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
30
54.5%
🔥
9
16.4%
🕊
8
14.5%
☃
2
3.64%
💋
2
3.64%
🤔
2
3.64%
🥰
2
3.64%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❤Немного о нашем новом дизайне!
Познакомьтесь! Это наш маскот, который немного заблудился на складах в морских глубинах, поэтому вы его не видели ^_^
Наш маскот — это рыбка челобебка с палитрой, символизирующей спокойствие и глубину нашего маркета. Мы стараемся сделать наш маркет лучше и больше, и, конечно, будем рады вашему мнению и идеям по нашему маркету!
🍑Сейчас мы работаем над дизайнами для постов и скоро начн…
✨МЫ ПРЕДСТАВЛЯЕМ НОВЫЙ ДИЗАЙН НАШЕГО АРТ-МАРКЕТА!
Дорогие слушатели и гости арт-маркета! Мы с радостью делимся новостью о готовности нового дизайна нашего маркета и его новом представителе! Мы обновляем наш старый дизайн на более современный и хотели бы узнать, как вам такой стиль? Ваше мнение для нас очень важно!
📩Напишите в комментариях, какой дизайн вам больше нравится и что, по вашему мнению, стало лучше?
🌸 ИЩЕМ НОВЫХ УЧАСТНИКОВ КОМАНДЫ ОРГАНИЗАТОРСКОГО СОСТАВА!
Дорогие гости нашего арт-маркета. Мы растем, планы становятся масштабнее, а рук для их воплощения нужно больше. Мы понимаем, что без новых людей движение замедлится, поэтому открываем поиск тех, кому близка наша идея.
Кого мы ищем:
🖌Оформитель
Тот, кто умеет рисовать простые, но атмосферные картинки для постов. Делать яркое оформление, которое хочется рассм…
Здравствуйте, дорогие золотые рыбки!
Все ваши прекрасные фотографии, которые сделала наша фотограф Саша Токарева уже в альбоме!
Альбом в фотографиях в ВК
СЕГОДНЯ ПРОШЕЛ НАШ ПЕРВЫЙ МАРКЕТ!
Спасибо всем, кто пришел, авторам и волонтёрам!
Вы все создали непередаваемую уютную атмосферу, и создали из обычного воскресенья настоящий праздник
Мы не идеальны, но прислушались к отзывам и предложениям волонтеров и наших авторов, мы будем становится только лучше для вас и вернёмся с новыми активностями, идеями и исправленными недочетами!
Ждём вас на следующем маркете ОКИ ОКИ!…
🎏 Билеты на Арт-Маркет Оки Оки
Вас ждут 30 невероятных авторов, классные мастерклассы и возможность погрузиться в азиатскую атмосферу!
Успей приобрести свой билет с эксклюзивным мерчом от наших авторов!
🎋 Билеты по ссылке:
https://spb.radario.ru/events/2607364/tickets
🎏 weste.oi с мягкими нежностями
tgk: @ westeoi
🎋 Билеты по ссылке:
https://spb.radario.ru/events/2607364/tickets
Санкт-Петербург | 3 мая
❤7🔥1🥰1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @oki_oki_spb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 3 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,293,515 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОКИ ОКИ | Арт-маркет в СПб” (@oki_oki_spb), 84 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oki_oki_spb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.