Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

OKEANMUDROSTI

@okeanmudrosti

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

572subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001615910174
TypeChannel
Username@okeanmudrosti
DescriptionЗдесь про кино, литературу, игры, рэп и качалочку
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/okeanmudrosti

Growth

5726 Aug 2026, 14:07 — 572 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:04 — 572 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 14:076 Aug 2026, 18:04
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 571–573 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 18:04572no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:07572first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
131.1%
avg views ÷ 572 subscribers
Avg views / post
750
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held16 (28 June 20261 August 2026)
Views total7,497
Reactions total525
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
408
Videos
39
Links
108

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

874 reactions across 16 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23927.3%
🔥18020.6%
🥰9110.4%
👍627.09%
😁495.61%
🤩485.49%
🙏424.81%
🎉293.32%
😨252.86%
🤔232.63%
🍾151.72%
💯131.49%
😢111.26%
😎91.03%
🫡80.915%
❤‍🔥70.801%
😱60.686%
👏40.458%
🌭20.229%
💔20.229%
7 further kinds91.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 874reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC318 views45 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В последнее время стал замечать, что в современных фильмах практически не показывают Майкла Дудикоффа... Не знаю, с чем это связано, но тенденция явно не хорошая...

😨25😢104🤝2😎2🤡1🫡1

1 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC538 views66 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Три дня я провел на пивном фестивале на родине пивного пива, пил там целебные напитки и худел прямо на глазах. Я поставил себе цель - попробовать все ИПЫ со всех уголков страны и составить хит-парад. К сожалению, я быстро спился, потому не до конца справился с задачей. Но всё же. Вот топ пива: На первом месте ИПА от бара Борода из Чебоксар. На втором месте ИПА от Кузницы знатного пива из Самары, ИПА от Шишкина из У

🔥41😁11👍6🥰3😎21👏1🥴1

27 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC580 views66 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Выпил пивка

48🎉11🔥3😎3👍1

26 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC552 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/dZ6IWC1w9-o?si=gNnbRlq73EeU_cPA https://www.twitch.tv/okeanmudrosti/ Друзья, вышли новые шутеры! BLOOD ALPHA BUILD [22 JUL 1996] RESTORATION PATCH - наш многоуважаемый Life_my_agony превратил альфа-версию Blood в современный блокбастер! PIGFACE - шутер про женщину в маске!!! Washington Prime - шутер про спецагента Кинкейда! SULFUR - что-то про туман неизвестности...

👍10❤‍🔥73🥰3

26 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC491 views51 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Это будет первый в истории ролик про клон Corporation, начинающийся с Инцидента в Варджиньи

🔥34🤩123👍1🤗1

23 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC638 views49 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну и цены раньше были. Я за 80 баксов купил бы лучше машину, квартиру, дом, бассейн, пиво, круиз до Мордовии, чем какой-то клон Корпорейшн

🤔19🥰135🔥4😁4👏2😎2

20 Jul 2026, 09:58 UTC≈1,060 views66 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Эх... Помните какие раньше были стандарты красоты в играх... Разработчики не стеснялись подчеркивать женские округлости и увеличивать их до желанных размеров... Теперь из-за повесточки таких красоток уже в играх никогда не встретишь((((

🤩36🥰19🔥4🌭2👍2😁2😱1

19 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC685 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/teBdqSJOQfw?si=Em9peCJiRh4roYCC https://www.twitch.tv/okeanmudrosti/ Продолжаем заценивать все шутеры, вышедшие за последние 50 лет! Cursed Sands - что-то про Вульфинштейн! Mars 3D - тайваньский Дум 1997 года! Dredd vs Death - что-то про судью Дредда! 2003 год! Нью щит! Warhammer 40000 Boltgun 2 - продолжение нашумевшего хита про Болтган!

🔥15🥰83🎉3👍1👏1

19 Jul 2026, 08:27 UTC705 views76 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Систем Шок уважаешь?

🔥49😁14🥰5😱5👍21

16 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC≈1,930 views52 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я вот думаю, что ретро и инди-игры интересны в первую очередь тем, что это плод воображения, таланта и упорства людей. Конкретных людей, а не компаний. Куда занимательнее наблюдать за тем, как зажигался и гас огонь в глазах первопроходцев, обладающих именами, чем следить за отчётностью обезличенных контор. Сейчас мир переживает, что из конторы Ид Софтвэр уволили 150 каких-то ноунеймов, что работали в каких-то там д

33👍7🔥4🤔4🥰4

9 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC931 views86 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Многие месяцы и даже годы я всячески откладывал передачу про Систем Шок. Внезапно замечая, что на канале давно не было роликов, я бросался исправлять ситуацию, на скорую руку клепая переводы Циви про всяких Ганмэнов и Дизрупторов. Отсутствие обещанного видео рисковало стать местным мемом, сам хотел над этим пошутить в ролике про невышедшие игры. Но сейчас я с твёрдой уверенностью готов заявить, что обещанная переда

51🔥17🥰10🎉3👍2🙏2😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @okeanmudrosti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 124,016 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OKEANMUDROSTI” (@okeanmudrosti), 572 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/okeanmudrosti.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.