5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,939–1,950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 18:08
1,946
+6
9 Aug 2026, 08:32
1,940
-4
6 Aug 2026, 18:41
1,944
-5
6 Aug 2026, 06:33
1,949
no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:07
1,949
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 1,946 subscribers
Avg views / post
243
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
8 (2 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,945
Reactions total
217
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
200 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
75
37.5%
🔥
65
32.5%
🥰
33
16.5%
⚡
18
9.00%
👏
6
3.00%
👍
3
1.50%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 217reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Последний день распродажи 🦩
Last call: напоминаем о возможности купить любой курс Окаруто по выгодной цене.
Онлайн-курс
«Современная магия: от тайных обществ до онлайн-ритуалов» — 6 лекций, 4500р.
Курсы в записи
«История эзотерических учений: от античности до наших дней» — 11 лекций, 5500р.
«Тантра: от погребальных костров Варанаси до секс-магии и нью-эйдж» — 6 лекций, 4500р.
«Эзотеризм и психология: просветлённый…
В рамках нашей распродажи можно купить записи нескольких прошедших онлайн-курсов по очень выгодным ценам!
В акции участвуют курсы:
«История и философия Телемы» — курс из 5 лекций, в которых Кира Можайская со свойственными её лекциям глубиной и проницательностью рассказывает о жизни и учении Алистера Кроули, а также о судьбе Телемы после него.
Цена: 3000р
«Спасительное знание: гностицизм, его история и современност…
Как в Ордене Золотой Зари заново создали енохианскую магию? ‼️
Система енохианской магии была разработана в XVI веке Джоном Ди и Эдвардом Келли во время их попыток установить диалог с ангелами. Но полноценной частью современного эзотеризма она стала только в конце XIX века, когда попала в плавильный котёл идей создателей Ордена Золотой Зари.
Удивительно, но между Ди и Золотой Зарёй енохианская магия практически не …
🎴Что такое карты Зенера и при чём тут психология?
Карты Зенера — самый известный инструмент парапсихологических исследований. Колода состоит из 25 карт с пятью различными символами: кругом, крестом, волнистыми линиями, квадратом и звездой. Они использовались для исследования наличия у людей экстрасенсорных способностей.
Карты были разработаны в 1930 году психологом Карлом Зенером по просьбе Джозефа Райна, который з…
Вышла последняя лекция курса в записи «Тантра: от погребальных костров Варанаси до секс-магии и нью-эйдж»! Теперь можно приобрести курс целиком и посмотреть все лекции сразу!
Курс посвящён разбору философии и практик индуистской тантры в их исторической динамике — от традиций средневековой Индии до прихода тантры на Запад.
Отдельно в последней лекции разбираются сексуальные практики тантризма и их место в истории т…
👹Делимся с вами фантазией на тему «Как герои наших курсов отмечали бы Ламмас?»
Сейчас приобрести наши курсы о тантре, эзотерической психологии, юнгианстве, гностицизме и современной магии можно с праздничными скидками в честь Ламмаса! Не упустите свой шанс!
📜Какую художку почитать? Рассказываем о романах, написанных магами и эзотериками.
Оккультисты всех времен брались за перо не только чтобы изложить эзотерическую философию, но и для того, чтобы поведать захватывающую историю. В нашей сегодняшней подборке лучшие романы магов ХХ века!
Праздничная сидка на все курсы Окаруто действует до 7 августа!
Курс-в-записи «Тантра: от погребальных костров Варанаси до секс-магии и нью-эйдж» доступен на нашей распродаже всего за 4500!
О чем курс?
Курс, посвящённый одной из самых загадочных и многогранных эзотерических традиций мира. В нём тантризм представлен как целостный и уникальный феномен индийской культуры. Мы последовательно разберём его историю, философию и практику. Увидим, как тантра, укоренённая в автохтонных ку…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @okarutoru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 26,796 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Окаруто / академические курсы об эзотеризме, мистицизме и магии” (@okarutoru), 1,946 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/okarutoru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.