Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Охуительные истории

Channel

Охуительные истории

@ohuitelnyeistorii

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

73subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001747159637
TypeChannel
Username@ohuitelnyeistorii
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ohuitelnyeistorii

Growth

6973716 August 2026 — 69 subscribers10 August 2026 — 69 subscribers14 August 2026 — 72 subscribers28 August 2026 — 73 subscribers6 August 202628 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 68–74 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 09:0373+1
14 Aug 2026, 17:5472+3
10 Aug 2026, 00:1569no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:1669first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁436.4%
💯327.3%
🔥327.3%
👍19.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC10 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @prolivstalinaPhoto

☕️ В Киеве продолжают пустеть полки в супермаркетах. Ситуацию усугубляют еще и ажиотажный спрос на предметы первой необходимости. Пока ситуация далеко не критичная, но если бы наша медийка умело бы заниматься чем-либо кроем вредительства, ажиотаж можно было бы подстегнуть. Но ничего, что не сможет медийка - сможет Искандер.

😁2

9 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC14 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @missilememeVideo

Video, posted without a caption

9 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC16 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @smitrich

А пацаны и не знают… + «Британия может впервые получить Конституцию. Новый премьер Энди Бернэм выступил за написание основного закона страны. Сейчас в Великобритании нет Конституции - система госуправления основана на законах, судебных решениях и международных договорах».

9 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC14 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @kramnikcatVideo

Посмотрел. Вопрос Мартенса был, звучал так, как звучал, и характерна его оговорка «убить больше русских - больше русских солдат конечно». На втором видео характерно замялась с «ээ» сербская переводчица, ухватившаяся в итоге за «солдат». Риторические вопросы и угрозы писать лень, да и смысла нет. И так, в общем все ясно. Люблю когда ясность.

💯3

9 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC12 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @cybersotnikPhoto

Максимальный репост всем неравнодушным. Власти Москвы скрывают. Радиационный фон в Московской области вырос в 700 раз до 28214,88 микрозиговерта. Норма 0,740 микрозиговерта. В области отключили интернет, чтобы никто не смог узнать настоящую ПРАВДУ. Сергей Собянин лично возле памятника Минину и Пожарскому инструктирует облученных 5-метровых срочников перед отправкой на Украину - показывает им фотографии стиральных

😁2

9 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC13 viewsread 10 August 2026

Тоись хохлы сознательно били по заведомо гражданским объектам ради медийного эффекта. Никогда такого не было, и вот опять. Напомните, какая статья Женевской конвенции это позволяет? #пидарасаведение #хохлы

9 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC13 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @vatforPhoto

Как раз тот же the Sunday Times сообщает.

9 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC13 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @WalkingDustSWPhoto

Никогда такого не было и вот опять: неожиданно украинцы сами подтвердили, что КАЗ "Арена" работает против FPV- дронов. Пишут, что КАЗ сбил 7 дронов, а всего потребовалось 15-20 дронов для поражения Т-72Б3А. Пыль шагающих катков

👍1

9 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC12 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @thevatnickPhoto

Не все герои носят плащи и маски.

9 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC12 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @panzwafflePhoto

Трудно поверить, но история с Т-72Б3А продолжается 8 августа 2026 года, то есть спустя примерно две с половиной недели после событий, хохлы-пропагандисты решили снова опубликовали кадры с российскими танками Т-72Б3А. План, вероятно, состоял в создании «антикрызы» для «кiрпуса Навоз». Но получился котёл. Снова. В данный момент это уже котёл предыдущего котла. Что произошло? 🔺 Опубликованном видео мы заметили все т

8 Aug 2026, 20:54 UTC17 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @kozakrichalaPhoto

Советы полиции Миннеаполиса – как избежать грабежа или подготовиться к нему. - Не выходите на улицу без сопровождения - Имейте при себе только самое необходимое - Будьте готовы расстаться с телефоном, сумочкой или кошельком - Не оказывайте злоумышленнику сопротивления - Запомните внешность подозреваемых Коза в MAX

8 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC19 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @PavloShehtmanPhoto

Сiтувацiя на росiи. Украiна перемогаэ! СУГС!

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ohuitelnyeistorii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Охуительные истории” (@ohuitelnyeistorii), 73 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ohuitelnyeistorii.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.