Channel
@ohgrusha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
497subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002225988482 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ohgrusha |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ohgrusha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 497 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 496 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 496 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (25 June 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,266 |
| Reactions total | 1,195 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,573 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5222111359222693831 | 568 | 36.1% | |
| custom 5308020751071223559 | 357 | 22.7% | |
| custom 5307748437259751263 | 161 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5469787700682851943 | 146 | 9.28% | |
| custom 5309877839095412838 | 143 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5418157194442979101 | 109 | 6.93% | |
| custom 5386494278925040574 | 57 | 3.62% | |
| custom 5463052131105798275 | 23 | 1.46% | |
| custom 5298786816197949913 | 9 | 0.572% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,573reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ohgrusha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⠀ ⠀ ⠀ мои грушевые 🤩 ⠀ а вдруг вам будет интересно? ⠀ ⠀ #заказы@lampooch хоту порисовать ваших ОС'ов, поэтому возьму комишечки, как картиночка постостом выше за 🖤🖤❤️❤️ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ занято 1/3 слотов ⠀заказать у тёти — @ohlampochka 🌼
custom 530774843725975126327custom 54181571944429791014
⠀ ⠀ прошедшие два дня были непростыми, но сейчас немножко в себя пришла и вот уже болотная ведьма Соня украшает канал 📖 ⠀ ⠀ #домдвухведьм@lampooch сегодня в планах убраться дома и купить подсолнухи!
custom 530987783909541283859custom 546978770068285194316custom 53080207510712235599custom 52987868161979499132
⠀ ⠀ меня поймали в момент моей древнегреческой одержимости 🙎♀️ и я, буквально запрыгивая в последний вагон, за два дня нарисовала открыточку в #мерчедвиж для зинидеи заказать можно будет через их группу в вк 🌙
custom 530802075107122355972custom 546978770068285194321custom 538649427892504057413
⠀ лампучане, думаю, я готова 📖 ⠀ ⠀ хочу сменить название канала совсем старички, наверное, помнят, что моя группа в вк раньше называлась «зажигая лампочки», затем «лампочка» и со временем это переросло в «lampooch» я раздумываю над «медовая груша» (груша=лампочка, медовая – дико жёлтая) ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ #текстопост@lampooch ваши мысли, ваши скакуны? 🌟
custom 522211135922269383158custom 541815719444297910119
одна река была как белый день.. ⠀ другая – чёрная как ночь.. а волны третьей были пламенем.. ⠀ ⠀но ожидало их одно.... 🌼 ⠀ ⠀ #заказы@lampooch античные выдуманные мужики 🙎♀️ дорисовала и такая довольная! эра штучек на чёрном фоне, очень нравится сейчас так делать
custom 530774843725975126359custom 522211135922269383126custom 530987783909541283816custom 53080207510712235593custom 54630521311057982752
⠀ ⠀любимое древнегреческое🏛 ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ #заказы@lampooch ⠀ ⠀это все на самом деле большая финансовая пирамида, потому что я получаю от рисования этих мифических мужиков нереальное удовольствие, а ещё деньги 🌹
custom 522211135922269383169custom 530774843725975126324custom 541815719444297910111custom 53080207510712235593custom 53098778390954128382custom 54630521311057982752custom 54697877006828519431
⠀ ⠀веснушечьи реквесты 🥰 я в такой сильной любви с каждого !! ⠀ ⠀ #интерактив@lampooch спасибо большое, что предлагали своих замечательных персонажей! я пока выдохлась, но попозже ещё обязательно будет всякое реквестовое (вы же знаете, я вас люблю) 🌟
custom 530802075107122355962custom 541815719444297910126custom 546305213110579827511custom 54697877006828519436custom 52221113592226938311custom 52987868161979499131
⠀ ⠀ куда по помытому?! 😡 ⠀ ⠀#интерактив@lampooch рыжик для @ludayas !! я эти подвязанные платочками волосы обожаю 🌟
custom 522211135922269383160custom 530774843725975126320custom 546978770068285194316custom 53080207510712235594
ещё одна веснушчатая крошка для @rixx_01 !! хочу так же одеваться 🌟 ⠀ ⠀#интерактив@lampooch подборка вырисовывается теплая желтоворыжая! самое моё любимое 🥰
custom 546978770068285194364custom 522211135922269383128custom 530802075107122355917custom 53864942789250405744
⠀ следующий веснушчатый 🥞 ⠀ ⠀#интерактив@lampooch я балдею с персонажей @KotNio, поэтому возможности не нарисовать кого-то из них просто не было !! ⠀ ⠀ можно догадаться по какому ⠀ ⠀принципу ваша тётя выбирает ⠀ ⠀персонажей для реквестов 🔫
custom 522211135922269383168custom 541815719444297910125custom 530802075107122355913custom 54630521311057982755custom 54697877006828519431
куриный отец , когда мышка пробежала, хвостиком махнула, яичко упало и разбилось 😡 ⠀ ⠀ #интерактив@lampooch я, конечно, уже больше не умею рисовать, ⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀но..🌟 залью в качестве подборкой, когда нарисую всех, кого выбрала, а пока реквест для @bimbosushiii_fx !!
custom 530802075107122355964custom 522211135922269383124custom 538649427892504057412custom 53077484372597512636custom 54697877006828519433
⠀⠀ ⠀😳😀🙂😌😥😜😖🥵😭☺️ ⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀просто хочу сказать, ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀что у меня лучшая аудитория наслушавшись рассказов о том, как в других каналах идут дела с активностью, могу только порадоваться и поблагодарить за то, как вы меня встретили после долгого отсутствия ⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀ спасибо большое ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀#интерактив@lampooch ну и за то, что вы такие хорошие, открываю набор реквестов с вашими осами 🌟❤️ присылайте ваших персонажей в комме…
custom 522211135922269383139custom 53077484372597512635custom 54181571944429791013custom 54630521311057982752
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ohgrusha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 225,568 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“груша медовая” (@ohgrusha), 497 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ohgrusha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.