Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Diary of hope ll Ginny Weasley x Tom Riddle

@oh_my_dears

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

131subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002058380449
TypeChannel
Username@oh_my_dears
DescriptionУкромный уголок, где любят самый недооценённый пейринг поттерианы — джинниморт. Джинни Уизли х Том Реддл | лорд Волдеморт. 🔞 Правила канала: https://telegra.ph/Pravila-soobshchestva-10-02-2 ВК: https://vk.com/oh_my_dears Чат: https://t.me/+3zyMk-X23-dj
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/oh_my_dears

Growth

1316 August 2026 — 131 subscribers9 August 2026 — 131 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 130–132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 01:01131no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:38131first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.5%
avg views ÷ 131 subscribers
Avg views / post
28.1
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
45.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held10 (4 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total281
Reactions total127
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,550
Videos
301
Links
1,440

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 23s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

127 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52740679995092061473729.1%
custom 59650308061024800711915.0%
custom 52740044597630297241713.4%
custom 52695702195625264171612.6%
custom 5267270397719504774107.87%
custom 5965129409961661791107.87%
custom 518866797789710750197.09%
custom 525580630107778894397.09%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC17 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

«...Дело в том, что тебе было всё равно, что ты пытался убить меня после всех этих месяцев, когда я думала, что мы друзья, когда я была единственной, кто вообще с тобой разговаривал, и я для тебя ничего не значила. Не очень чётко, но я помню, что ты говорил, когда заставил нарисовать послание о моей смерти, и кое-что из того, что ты позже сказал Гарри, назвав меня скучной, глупой маленькой девочкой. Глупо ли испытыва

custom 52558063010777889433custom 59650308061024800712custom 51886679778971075011custom 52695702195625264171custom 52740044597630297241

8 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC16 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Мини ★★ of all my demon spirits | «из всех моих внутренних демонов» автора basketofnovas (slashmarks)★★ «Дорогой Том, Я всё ещё злюсь на тебя за попытку убить меня, просто к слову. Но ты мертв. Гарри убил тебя дважды. Так что, наверное, справедливость восторжествовала. На самом деле нет. Я говорила, что больше никогда не буду вести дневник, что ненавижу тебя, что жалею, что не выбросила твой дневник в огонь в обще

custom 59650308061024800713custom 52740679995092061472custom 52558063010777889431custom 52695702195625264171

8 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC23 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @FieryQueen_artPhoto

😀😃😃: «Канарейка», FieryQueen 🌟 Все знают, как заканчиваются сказки: Красавица влюбляется в Чудовище, которое после победы над злом превращается в Прекрасного Принца. Но в Королевстве Кривых Зеркал все наоборот, и вот привычные образы дрожат, словно миражи, превращаясь во что-то иное: стрелки часов бегут в обратную сторону, мир искажается, зло подбирается все ближе и ближе. Сказка превращается в кошмар. А что это с т

custom 52740679995092061475custom 59650308061024800713custom 59651294099616617913custom 51886679778971075011custom 52695702195625264171

7 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC26 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Он больше не спрашивает, зачем она здесь. Этого не описать словами, но он всё равно верит ей. Безоговорочно. Нетипично. Очень уязвимо. Он почти у выхода, но не может сделать и шагу. Её, наверно, пугает его нечеловеческое лицо, думает Лорд, так долго презиравший всё своё человеческое, слишком человеческое. — Вероятно тебя постигло разочарование, — Лорд изо всех сил старается сдержать свои шипящие. — Почему? — Джинн

custom 52740679995092061475custom 52558063010777889433custom 52740044597630297242custom 51886679778971075011

6 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC26 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @july_sunsetttVideo

Бабочка, бабочка, бабочка🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 Каждая 🤩🤩🤩 история 🤩🤩🤩 начинается с одного взмаха крыла ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ Гуляла по просторам тг и наткнулась на #ЭффектБабочкиChallenge от замечательного канала архив заклинаний| OlBaz✨ Мне на ум тут же пришла эта дурацкая песенка (надеюсь, она заклинила у вас в мозгах и теперь вы напеваете её вместе со мной), и идея возникла тут же. Как могла попыталась её воплотить. Цель

custom 52740679995092061477custom 52695702195625264175custom 59650308061024800713custom 52558063010777889432custom 59651294099616617911

6 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC28 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩Правильное 🤩🤩🤩🤩окончание 🤩🤩🤩 истории Тома. Арт: dami-art✨ #MeropeGaunt #фанарт

custom 59651294099616617916custom 52695702195625264174custom 52740044597630297244custom 52672703977195047741custom 52740679995092061471

5 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC35 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Джинни, девушка из простой рабочей семьи, и подумать не могла, что когда-нибудь заинтересует столь блестящего джентельмена, как мистер Том Реддл. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Своей педантичной строгостью, умным взглядом почти немигающих черных глаз, локонами идеально уложенных волос Том даже слегка пугает Джинни. Но все сомнения бегут прочь, стоит ему только улыбнуться ей и предложить свой локоть. Джинни ничего не остается,

custom 52672703977195047747custom 52740679995092061474custom 59650308061024800713custom 52695702195625264172

5 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC31 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @axlhoffVideo

«Ты хотела забыть меня... но я помню... и я верну тебя туда, где всё началось». #ginnymort #ginnyweasley #tomriddle

custom 52740679995092061479custom 51886679778971075016custom 52740044597630297244custom 52672703977195047742

4 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC40 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Какую летнюю Джинни предпочитаете?👧

  1. 133%
  2. 217%
  3. 325%
  4. 48%
  5. 533%
  6. 633%

The shares total 149%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 52740044597630297244custom 52695702195625264172custom 52740679995092061472

4 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC39 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кроме одной чудесной летней 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 может быть только шесть чудесных летних Джинни. Достаем из закромов старую нашу рубрику #фанкаст и с ней примеряем роль на этих девчонок: 1️⃣ Кая Скоделарио 2️⃣ Мила Куниц 3️⃣ Аврил Лавин 4️⃣ Софи Тернер 5️⃣ Кристен Стюарт 6️⃣ Роуз Лесли 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

custom 59650308061024800715custom 52740044597630297242custom 52740679995092061472

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @oh_my_dears. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

Какую летнюю Джинни предпочитаете?👧

  1. 133%
  2. 217%
  3. 325%
  4. 48%
  5. 533%
  6. 633%

The shares total 149%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 251,681 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Diary of hope ll Ginny Weasley x Tom Riddle” (@oh_my_dears), 131 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oh_my_dears.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.