Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Миша Малышев

Channel

Миша Малышев

@og_mishgun

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

638subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001227852948
TypeChannel
Username@og_mishgun
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/og_mishgun

Growth

638641639.56 August 2026 — 641 subscribers6 August 2026 — 641 subscribers14 August 2026 — 638 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 638–641 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 02:17638-3
6 Aug 2026, 17:31641no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:04641first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

290 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6321.7%
😁5318.3%
🔥4916.9%
❤‍🔥3512.1%
💅227.59%
👍175.86%
💯155.17%
🕊82.76%
🤔82.76%
custom 537298197680436674162.07%
custom 542488544110078242051.72%
👌51.72%
👏20.69%
🥰10.345%
🦄10.345%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 290reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 17 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jun 2026, 14:12 UTC668 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🐐

8🕊3💯1😁1custom 54248854411007824201

17 Jun 2026, 12:16 UTC674 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Спросил на всякий случай, сказали что всё так

💯10🕊3💅2custom 54248854411007824201

17 Jun 2026, 10:07 UTC641 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥11👌3💯2🕊21

17 Jun 2026, 09:05 UTC646 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Есть кто на Vercel Ship London? Пишите @slapster, пересечёмся

💅7👏2😁1

16 Jun 2026, 15:46 UTC733 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Почему xAI купили Cursor за $60 миллиардов? Потому что xAI всё ещё хотят улучшать Grok и конкурировать с OpenAI и Anthropic, но у них не хватает хорошего RL. А у Cursor он как раз один из лучших (один Composer 2.5 Technical Report чего стоит) А ещё у xAI очень много компьюта. Пока что звучит что очень даже GMI.

5👍4💅1💯1🥰1

11 Jun 2026, 16:00 UTC976 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Начинаем 🆘 https://www.youtube.com/live/PdmV5MMCrjo

🔥5💅1💯1

10 Jun 2026, 16:39 UTC828 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @artem_designich

Завтра я и @og_mishgun устраиваем вайб-код баттл на стриме Будем генерировать одну и ту же идею, а потом разбирать и прожаривать решения друг друга. Вы тоже будете судьями: поможете понять, кто справился лучше. Миша - фронтенд-разработчик с опытом дохуя лет. Активно использует иишки в работе. Сейчас работает в White Circle — французском стартапе, который занимается безопасностью в сфере AI. Также поотвечаем на во

💅5❤‍🔥2👌2

24 May 2026, 19:33 UTC≈1,270 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Старбакс откатил свой AI inventory tool после 11 месяцев работы, потому что тот не мог отличать обычное молоко от овсяного и галлюцинировал несуществующие вещи А вы боитесь --dangerously-skip-permissions делать. Вон даже Старбакс не боится. Если что откатите тоже прокрутите фарш обратно

😁10custom 53729819768043667413💅2

21 May 2026, 11:56 UTC≈1,330 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://x.com/i/trending/2057355161878540480?s=20

custom 53729819768043667413custom 54248854411007824203

14 May 2026, 20:06 UTC≈1,300 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

НО! Только когда новый человек подписывается Потому приходится хранить всех уникальных подписчиков Так что FYI, у меня есть база всех отписчиков тоже. Just letting you know

😁18🤔2

14 May 2026, 19:54 UTC≈1,040 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Voice message

Кстати. Каждый раз, когда на канал кто-то подписывается, у меня на маке на всю громкость играет этот звук

😁16🔥21

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @og_mishgun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 638,232 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Миша Малышев” (@og_mishgun), 638 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/og_mishgun.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.