Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for /home/oficsu/blog

Channel

/home/oficsu/blog

@oficsu_blog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

119subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002185199137
TypeChannel
Username@oficsu_blog
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/oficsu_blog

Growth

118119118.59 Aug 2026, 04:15 — 118 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 04:45 — 118 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 10:32 — 119 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 04:159 Aug 2026, 10:32
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 118–119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 10:32119+1
9 Aug 2026, 04:45118no change
9 Aug 2026, 04:15118first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
59s
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2139.6%
👍917.0%
🤡713.2%
611.3%
😁59.43%
🥱23.77%
👎11.89%
🤔11.89%
🤯11.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2024 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jun 2026, 19:23 UTC250 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Incident Report: CVE-2024-YIKES Status: Resolved (accidentally) Severity: Critical → Catastrophic → Somehow Fine Summary A compromised dependency in the JavaScript ecosystem led to credential theft, which enabled a supply chain attack on a Rust compression library, which was vendored into a Python build tool, which shipped malware to approximately 4 million developers before being inadvertently patched by an unre

2🔥2

10 Jun 2026, 21:10 UTC676 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Это же нужно было так точно подметить! Метамодерн — единственное доступное словарное слово среди тех, что включают в себя суффикс -modern, определено как следующее за постмодерном, и для того было с намерением опущено на пикче – наравне с упоминанием C++20, недвусмысленно отсылая на качество и сроки имплементации модулей!

🔥31

29 Oct 2025, 20:37 UTC≈1,200 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Приватная предыстория разработки в публичном репозитории Задача: нужно заопенсорсить локально разрабатываемый проект Препятствие: локальная история содержит грязь, да и вообще потенциально опасные вещи вроде приватных ключей, которые затруднительно выискивать в истории, чтобы подчистить Очевидное решение? Сквошим все коммиты в один, например так: git reset "$(git commit-tree "HEAD^{tree}" -m "initial commit")". За

🔥9🤡7🥱2👎1

5 Oct 2025, 12:35 UTC≈1,960 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Гугл, реддит и автоматический перевод Реддит некоторое время назад научился автоматическому переводу своих страниц. Он даже позволяет настроить список языков пользователя, которые переводить не нужно А ещё он позволяет задать целевой язык прямо в url, что могло бы быть удобной фичей, если бы только не... Если бы не гугл, который у нас, как обычно, умнее всех. Эти гении начали приписывать tl=ru к случайным url редд

🔥4

30 Sept 2025, 23:01 UTC871 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

*** Но запускать аккуратно, достоверно известно, что в такой конфигурации бывают проблемы с (очевидно) Secure Boot и BitLocker. И вы точно не хотите шифровать её с помощью VeraCrypt — три мои попытки (из четырёх, впрочем) оказались неудачными. Хотя я и делал отчаянный шаг, позволяя винде самой создать разделы, после чего копировал разметку обратно на оригинальный физический диск — мог и промахнуться несколькими секто

👍1

30 Sept 2025, 23:01 UTC809 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

** Я не хотел добавлять "${ovmf[@]}" в качестве основного содержания статьи, но без него примеры были бы неполны и ничего бы просто не запускалось на практике, поэтому разъяснение здесь, в сноске. Запись выше просто раскрывает массив дополнительных аргументов для qemu, добавляя поддержку efi, отсутствие которой может оказаться неожиданностью для уже установленных систем во время запуска. Вот содержимое массива: ovmf=

👍1

30 Sept 2025, 23:01 UTC716 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

* Это кастомная утилита, а не production-ready решение, абсолютную безопасность не гарантирую, как и отсутствие ошибок, способных приводить к повреждению данных. Для прода возьмите более зрелый продукт — VirtualBox это умеет, например, прямо из ui

👍1

30 Sept 2025, 23:00 UTC704 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Форвардим физический диск в qemu немного* безопаснее Если у вас дуал-бут, то бывает удобно запустить соседнюю операционную систему в виртуалке. С qemu это вроде бы очень просто — запустили qemu-system-x86_64 -drive format=raw,file=/dev/nvme0n1 "${ovmf[@]}"**, выбрали в загрузчике в виртуалке соседнюю систему и радуемся, всё отлично. Всё отлично до... первой ошибки... В соседнюю систему пошарен уже смонтированный на

1👍1🤯1

19 Feb 2025, 05:01 UTC≈1,200 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Напоминаю, кстати, про свой виджет, заменяющий ⌨️⌨️⌨️ в баше на более удобную альтернативу. Заодно он является и альтернативой для похожего виджета от fzf, обеспечивая в сравнении с ними... 🐚 Нечёткий поиск Можно опечататься, но команда всё равно будет найдена в отличие от баша, где даже исправление опечатки потребует сброса поиска 🔍 Мгновенное выполнение команды Нажав ⌨️⌨️⌨️, вы можете выполнить найденную команду

🔥32

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @oficsu_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,250,645 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“/home/oficsu/blog” (@oficsu_blog), 119 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oficsu_blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.