Posted without readable text

Channel
offcrypt
@offcrypt
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
482subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001520385814 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @offcrypt |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/offcrypt |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 482 | -9 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 491 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 493 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 497 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 501 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 501 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 7 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 53s
- Average length
- 53s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
74 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 43 | 58.1% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 28.4% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 10.8% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 2.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2024 to 28 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🐶 Пора за работу! Включаемся в тренд SocialFi Всех с Новым годом! Отдохнули уже и пора включаться. Крипта растет дальше, впереди снижение доминации Биткоина и альтсезон! Чтобы подготовиться и быть в тренде нужно делать активности. Сегодня будем делать Social Fi внутри Солана-кошелька Phantom. Что делать? 🔸 Заходите в мобильную версию кошелька Phantom. Если его нет, то найдете в AppStore или Google Play по названи…
🔥4
С наступающим Новым годом!
🔥7
Крипта это интересно и разнообразно, главное не скатиться до такого. 😅
😁2❤1
🛒 Spellborne раздали токены за 1 сезон Если делали проект со мной, проверяйте ваши награды в игре в меню по кнопке "Q". У меня получилось 728 токенов за 4000 место в рейтинге, сколько это денег узнаем на TGE. Сейчас идёт второй награждаемый сезон и я пока в топ 1000 игроков.🏆 Для участия во втором сезоне игры нужно делать все те же задания в ежедневных квестах по кнопке Q, а также участвовать в ПВП в игре. Для уве…
🔥3
С ребятами откопали, что за пул в 222,222 $MEME насыпят токенов PENGU! Предлагаю собрать нужное количество $MEME и спылесосить завтрашний пул токенов. Группа с оповещениями https://t.me/Pengu_Meme 🔉 Общаемся в чате Здесь.
Upd. в Memland можно получить STEAK за дроп Пингвинов, а также застейкать их, чекайте тут: https://www.stakeland.com/farm/pengu Я закину весь дроп. Пока бычка можно так рискнуть.
🔥 Дроп от AllignNetwork Довольно криповый сайт, олдскул в действии, но безопасно. Чекайте дроп, если держали токены проектов после дропа в размере не менее 50$ за все время холда. 🔎 Чекнуть дроп Здесь У меня 2812 токенов $ALIGN, не знаю много это или мало, но приятно. ) Список проектов: 🔹 Mina (MINA) 🔹 Starknet (STRK) 🔹 Polygon (POL) 🔹 EigenLayer (EIGEN) 🔹 ZKsync (ZK) 🔹 Scroll (SCROLL) 🔹 Taiko (TKO) ➡️Telegram |…
🔥1
🕹 Дроп от Пингвинов В прошлом году игрушки их покупали, также за стейкинг от 690 $MEME раздали (тоже делали), в общем по деньгам это. Получилось где-то 300$ за все активности, неплохо, учитывая что я уже не ждал.) 🔎 Проверить дроп Здесь Насыпали много, на 7 млн кошельков, обязательно проверяйте дроп везде! Приятной бычки и всем огня! ❤️🔥 ➡️Telegram | Chat | Mirror
🔥4❤1
😎 Отличный дроп от тестнета Movement Сезон пожинания плодов продолжается, копим на отпуск дальше с Movement. Делал неактивно, был в отпуске, заработал в среднем по 15 токенов на аккаунт на 20 аккаунтов, что примерно равно 300 токенов = 280$. На аккаунт с 300-400 выполненных квестов людям раздали по 4-5к токенов. Цена сейчас на рынке составляет 0,8$. То есть мог быть лайфчейндж, если бы сильнее поверил в проект. (В…
❤1
🕹 Pirate Nation раздали дроп Pirate Nation - это такая пиксельная игра, с элементами экономики, карточными боями и коллекционирования. Несколько раз в канале упоминал, но гайд так и не писал. Недавно раздали дроп за второй сезон и сразу же запустили третий сезон. Дроп раздали по тирам, нужно было собрать от 10 млн очков, чтобы точно получить токены, иначе там розыгрыш. 🔎 Если делали проверяйте Здесь Я получил др…
❤3
👑 У Blocklords прошла AMA-сессия на Binance и есть что рассказать по игре! На АМА, CEO Давид показал Roadmap на 25 год, где нас ждет много нового! Напомню, Blocklords - одна из ожидаемых AAA-игр в крипте, с поддержкой крупных фондов и которая билдится уже почти 5 лет. В прошлом году они окрыли Бета-клиент игры и уже провели 4 аирдропа. Более подробно про игру писал Здесь, обязательно почитайте. В самом проекте я у…
❤4🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @offcrypt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@offcrypt named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“offcrypt” (@offcrypt), 482 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/offcrypt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.