🗓 Розыгрыш 3 календарей! 🎮 Условия: Ставить звёзды под этот пост (только в канале @off_lab) 🐶 Призы: 🥇 Desk Calendar №33681 🥈 Desk Calendar №33727 🥉 Desk Calendar №33710 🕗Конец: 31.01.2025 23:00 по МСК 🐶 Навигация по проекту
❤10🤡4👍1
Signed ㅤ Off

Channel
@off_lab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
474subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002151678980 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @off_lab |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/off_lab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 474 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 474 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
290 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 70 | 24.1% | |
| 🔥 | 61 | 21.0% | |
| ❤ | 47 | 16.2% | |
| 🤡 | 47 | 16.2% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 6.55% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 4.14% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 2.07% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 1.72% | |
| 🤷♂ | 4 | 1.38% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 1.03% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 1.03% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 1.03% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.69% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.69% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.69% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.345% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.345% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.345% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.345% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 290reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2025 to 31 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @off_lab. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 January 2025 to 31 January 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🗓 Розыгрыш 3 календарей! 🎮 Условия: Ставить звёзды под этот пост (только в канале @off_lab) 🐶 Призы: 🥇 Desk Calendar №33681 🥈 Desk Calendar №33727 🥉 Desk Calendar №33710 🕗Конец: 31.01.2025 23:00 по МСК 🐶 Навигация по проекту
❤10🤡4👍1
Signed ㅤ Off
👍 Rug Police начали расследование по делу Bolgur, Whales, Coffin и Memelandia, по которому недавно проводили AMA в Ton Dyor! 🔎 🔥 Хоть расследование ещё ведётся (AUDIT), но на доске с кейсами уже можно посмотреть собранные данные! Расследование как всегда сделано очень тщательно и детально, и собрано много фактов! 📌 Доска расследований 🐶 Навигация по проекту
🔥3❤1👍1
Signed ㅤ Off
🗓 Большинство отписали и получили свои звёзды назад в виде календарей. 📴 Снайпер выключен, если кому-то нужен скрипт: продам в лс ^__^ 🐶 Навигация по проекту
👍5❤3👏1🫡1
Signed ㅤ Off
🎉 Giveaway Finished! 🎉 Winners received the following gifts: 1. Jester Hat #3051 - Telegram Link 2. Jester Hat #3081 - Telegram Link
👍8🔥3🙈3🥰2🤡1
Signed Tonnel Relayer Bot
🤔 Из-за того что было с улучшениями подарков сегодня (цена на улучшение 25к, потом снизили до 2.5к, сейчас цена 1к) становится немного страшно за наш снайпер (где сейчас лежит звёзд более чем на 3к$ 🙃) поэтому всем, кто закинул туда звёзды я в лс отправлю голосование, выключаем ли мы снайпер и делаем рефанд! Результаты опубликую тут! 🏋️ Всётаки безопасность на 1 месте :_) 🐶 Навигация по проекту
👍10🔥5👏3❤2
Signed ㅤ Off
🧮 Саммари АМА Сессии по Simple Coin 📋Тема сессии Обсуждение токена Simple Coin и его механик, дилемм и будущих направлений развития. Спикеры и участники: - Pugg (спикер, СЕО Simple Coin) - Niki (спикер, представляющий проект) - Виталий (фаундер проекта Griffinston) - Участники из сообщества Simple Coin и гости. ❓ Основные темы обсуждения 1. Концепция Simple Coin - Дефляционный токен на блокчейне TON: Simple Coin …
👍7🔥5❤2🤝1😁1
Signed ㅤ Off
🟢Друзья, всем доброе утро! А вот и запись нашей вчерашней AMA. Слушаем и вникаем 🍸 Swap | Gecko | Chat | Chanel | X(twitter) | SC ChatBot | NFT Scanlen | Website | SC Portal (переходник) | WhitePaper
🔥2❤1❤🔥1👍1🕊1
Signed ㅤ Off
🎙 Ton Dyor выложили запись AMA. Так что длинная версия саммари всё таки будет) ✔️ Короткая версия саммари – *тык* ✔️ Запись AMA сессии – *тык* ⌨️ Собственно более длинная версия саммари: # AMA Сессия: Обсуждение конфликта между проектами Гидра и Булгур ## Участники сессии - Спикеры: - Соня (представитель проекта Гидра) - Участники проекта Булгур (непосредственно не указаны по именам, но упоминаются как команд…
👍2🤡2👏1🤝1
Signed ㅤ Off
🐣 Теперь у Off Lab есть свой Х аккаунт, там так-же будут публиковаться различные новости и полезная информация! https://x.com/xOffLab 🐶 Навигация по проекту
🤡8❤5🔥5👍2🫡2
Signed ㅤ Off
😰 Я уснул во время рассказа Сони, запись не сохранилась. Саммари: Не я заскамил а меня😢 🐶 Навигация по проекту
🤡17🔥12😁5👍3👏3❤2👀1🤝1
Signed ㅤ Off
Как только АМА закончится, через несколько минут выложу саммари по ней ✍️
🤡13🔥10👍6👏4❤3😁3💩1🤔1
Signed ㅤ Off
Ваши ставки? 😬
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍8❤6👏1🔥1🤡1🫡1😁1😱1
Signed ㅤ Off
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @off_lab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ваши ставки? 😬
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2025 to 31 January 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 516,193 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@off_lab named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Off lab” (@off_lab), 474 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/off_lab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.