Channel
@ofcrigelsq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
242subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001753294857 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ofcrigelsq |
| Description | 𝐑IGEL is a squad was formed on 14 August 2022 on the @telegram. Rigel has a slogan that reads "𝐒tart a 𝐁right 𝐋ife 𝐋ike a 𝐑aidgel 𝐒tar". Ch 2nd : @officialrigel Ch shitpost : @shitpostrigel Bot ofc : @ofcrigelbot Bot mpps : @psrigelbot - 𝐑IGEL |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 29 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ofcrigelsq |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 242 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 242 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 29 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 20 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ Duhh gimanaa yaa??? Fakta terakhirnya adalah, David menancapkan mayat korban di pagar. Aku berasa merinding bangettt, gimanaa pendapat kalian tentang David inii? Ada yang kesall sama seperti akuu??? Pertemuan kita selalu singkat ya teman rigel, tidak terasa sekarang sudah waktunya akuu untuk mengakhiri pembahasan kita 🙁 Aku Nadine Margareth, izin pamit undur diri. Sampai ketemu dikonten selanjutnyaa 👋👋…
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ Perintah lelucon 2009 Pada tahun 2009 perintah anonimitas dikeluarkan oleh Pengadilan Tinggi selama proses dewan pembebasan bersyarat. Perintah itu ditentang oleh pers Inggris dan Asosiasi Pers, didukung oleh Sekretaris Negara untuk Kehakiman, yang berpendapat bahwa menetapkan preseden seperti itu akan mencegah peliputan penjahat berbahaya. Perintah bungkam dicabut pada 21 Mei 2013 oleh Lord Justice Pi…
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ Dicirikan sebagai "Monster of Worcester", McGreavy menjadi subjek liputan pers yang substansial pada saat kejahatan itu terjadi; Liputan sporadis, kadang-kadang, dalam kasus tabloid, di halaman depan, berlanjut hingga saat ini. ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ McGreavy dihukum karena membunuh seorang anak laki-laki berusia empat tahun, seorang gadis berusia dua tahun, dan seorang bayi berusia sembilan bulan di Worcester pada bulan April 1973 saat mengasuh anak. Rincian pembunuhan itu mengerikan; satu-satunya penjelasannya adalah bayi itu tidak berhenti menangis. ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ Dia menjadi berita pada tahun 2013 ketika perintah anonimitas dicabut berdasarkan temuan bahwa ada kepentingan publik dalam permohonan pembebasan bersyaratnya dan bahwa tidak ada bahaya langsung dalam hidupnya. Pada 2013 dia ditahan di unit tahanan yang rentan di mana dia menghabiskan sebagian besar dari 40 tahun di penjara. ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ofcrigelsq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,270,792 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ofcrigelsq named 25 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OFC RIGEL” (@ofcrigelsq), 242 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ofcrigelsq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.