hi

Channel
BORDEAUX
@ofcbordeaux
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
220subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001426078313 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ofcbordeaux |
| Description | ㅤ 𝗪𝗘𝗟𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗘 𝗧𝗢 𝗕𝗢𝗥𝗗𝗘𝗔𝗨𝗫! Born to be rock n roll. ──────────────── 𝐂ontact ᎒ ≛ (dadah) 𝐏artnership ᎒ ≛ @GR3YROBOT ≛ @GREYFRIENDS # MAY, 2O. 2O2O 𔓕 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ofcbordeaux |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 220 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 220 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,430
- Videos
- ≈1,730
- Links
- ≈8,960
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
32 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 37.5% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 18.8% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 15.6% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 9.38% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 3.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2023 to 27 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
dex, pakabs
kkkkangen
👍3❤🔥1
wow
Hi
👍2
Sticker, posted without a caption
dari 15k
😭2
mayan yah
😭2
wow 861 sisanya
😭2
🫰🏻🫰🏻🫰🏻🫰🏻
Happy valentine
dih kangen bgt sih sm deks
😢3❤2🔥1🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ofcbordeaux. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 644,057 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@alumnilontee · 252 postsLa Bordeux's.
@arsipanbordeaux · 72 posts𝐉𝐄𝐍𝐍𝐈𝐄 𝐂𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐓𝐑𝐘
@JENTRYOFFICIAL · 142 posts𝐎𝐅𝐂 𝐉𝐈𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐎𝐗 𝐆𝐀𝐍𝐊 || OPMEM
@jiancoxofc · 262 postsINTERVENU ORGANIZER
@OFCINTERVENU · 1492 postsOFC KAWASAN TAEJÈN
@OFCKAWASANTAEJEN · 162 posts✶ ALTAR!EZ ✶ HIRING ADMIN
@ALTAR1EZ · 181 postCOMBINED MBYS & DSVMK
@archivemkboys · 51 postARSIP INTELIJEN
@ARSIPINTELIJEN · 51 post𝗕𝗜𝗚 𝗕𝗢𝗦𝗦 Poster.
@BigbossPM_mv · 801 post𝒄𝒖𝒘𝒑𝒊𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒇𝒆 𝒓𝒑𝒘 —
@caferpwcuwpie · 331 post۫ % ˖ ֺɕ݁ᥣᦅׁᥙׄძׅׄyr݁𐐼ꪱᥒડƙy˖ ָ ֙ぅ || Rombak👍
@Cloudyrainsky · 301 postEUGENE PROMOTE // PINNED
@EugenePromote · 51 post[BUBAR] JARENE JOWO
@JARENEJOWOOFC · 991 postHIATUS
@LIMERENCEMESSAGGIO · 221 postMPPS THE VALKREY
@listmppsthevalkrey · 61 post⋆ 𝐃𝘙ꓥ𝘍0𝘟 . $$
@OFCDFX · 181 post𝐎𝐅𝐂 𝐖𝐀𝐑𝐏𝐀𝐓 𝟖𝟔
@ofcwarpat86 · 121 postMedia Partner Baxter
@patnerbaxter · 61 postQUARTINITY HOUSE
@QUARTINITYHOUSE · 131 post𝐑𝐀𝐈𝐊𝐀𝐍 𝐂𝐈𝐓𝐘 🇹🇭
@RAIKANCITYOFC · 201 postRVQUEENDOM POST
@RVQUEENDOMPOST · 181 post〔 ꒰🏡꒱ : : ˓˓៹ trezᶠᵃᵐˢ ҂ 〕
@trezfams · 221 post𝐘𝐀𝐑𝐃 𝐁𝐎𝐘𝐒 ( 𝐘𝐁𝐒 )
@Yardboysofc · 271 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BORDEAUX” (@ofcbordeaux), 220 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ofcbordeaux.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.