Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝕆 ℂ𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕗𝕚𝕝𝕚𝕒

Channel

𝕆 ℂ𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕗𝕚𝕝𝕚𝕒

@ocinefilia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

817subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001307530644
TypeChannel
Username@ocinefilia
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ocinefilia

Growth

817818817.57 August 2026 — 818 subscribers8 August 2026 — 818 subscribers14 August 2026 — 817 subscribers21 August 2026 — 818 subscribers28 August 2026 — 817 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 817–818 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 23:24817-1
21 Aug 2026, 16:16818+1
14 Aug 2026, 18:05817-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:32818no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:24818first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1076.9%
👍323.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2025 to 3 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Apr 2026, 21:09 UTC365 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/SaudadeNegra 📢 Nova fãsub no radar Boas, malta! Recebemos um pedido de um seguidor do 𝕆 ℂ𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕗𝕚𝕝𝕚𝕒 para dar visibilidade a um novo projecto: @SaudadeNegra. Pelo que sabemos, estão agora a começar, por isso ainda não temos feedback ou experiência directa com o trabalho deles. Importante também dizer que não fazemos parte da equipa, nem temos qualquer ligação ao projecto. Dito isto, tudo o que seja tra

👍1

9 Jan 2026, 22:18 UTC515 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎥 Terror extremo que não quer divertir, quer destruir Mártires não é entretenimento. Não é alívio. Não é aquele terror para comer pipocas. É uma experiência violenta, apertada e profundamente desconfortável. E é exactamente por isso que funciona. Vi o filme e não gostei de o ver. E atenção, isto não é um defeito. É o propósito. Mártires deixa-te maldisposto, cansado, a pensar na vida e a perguntar porque caralho al

👍1

9 Jan 2026, 22:18 UTC405 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Mártires (Martyrs) [2008] #Terror ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️★★ (8/10) 💀Mártires: Um filme que te entra pela pele dentro e não pede desculpa

👍1

3 Aug 2025, 17:20 UTC657 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎥 FUBAR: Quando Arnold vira pai, espião e terapeuta… tudo ao mesmo tempo. A primeira série live-action de Schwarzenegger. É um cocktail explosivo de comédia, acção e drama familiar, servido com o carisma de Arnie como barman. Luke Brunner, um agente da CIA que nunca se reformou, ainda manda mais charme que metade do catálogo da Netflix, mesmo com rugas e menos bíceps. A primeira temporada vive da relação entre Luke

3

3 Aug 2025, 17:19 UTC467 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

FUBAR [2023–2025] #Série #Comédia #Acção #Netflix ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️★★★ (7/10) Um casamento entre True Lies e uma sitcom de famílias disfuncionais.

2 Aug 2025, 12:57 UTC417 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎥 O Chacal: "A bala é certeira, mas a série... nem sempre." O Chacal é uma adaptação moderna e ambiciosa do clássico de Frederick Forsyth, com raízes nos filmes de 1973 e 1997. A série da Sky, a maior estreia da plataforma com 4,5 milhões de espectadores no Reino Unido, tenta honrar esse legado e, em muitos momentos, acerta em cheio. Começa com um estrondo: o tiro em Munique, montado com precisão cirúrgica por Eddie

2 Aug 2025, 12:57 UTC355 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

O Chacal (The Day of the Jackal) [2024] ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️★★ (8/10) #Série #Thriller #Acção #SkyOriginal 🎯O Caçador, o Alvo e o Peso do Passado.

23 Jul 2025, 20:59 UTC382 viewsread 8 August 2026

🎥 Ninja Scroll: O Mercenário (1993): Há filmes que são feridas abertas. Vi isto em miúdo, quando devia estar a ver Dragon Ball. Mas o Tessai arrancou braços e bebeu sangue como se fosse uma mini fresquinha. Nunca mais fui o mesmo. Ninja Scroll é uma cicatriz na retina. Uma pancada que ainda dói. Um orgasmo de sangue, suor e dor, desenhado com uma beleza suja que hoje não se faz. Jubei é um samurai fodido. Triste. S

23 Jul 2025, 20:58 UTC333 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ninja Scroll: O Mercenário (Jūbei Ninpūchō) [1993] #Anime #ArtesMarciais ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️★★ (8/10) ⚔️ Ninja Scroll: Um Corpo a Sangrar, uma Alma a Morrer Devagar.

23 Jun 2025, 20:05 UTC442 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎥 Tentação: Um Pecado Nacional com Corpo e Alma Há filmes que chocam. Outros que despertam. Tentação fez as duas coisas e gravou o seu nome na história. Numa era em que o cinema português se perdia em metáforas existenciais murmuradas em salas escuras, Joaquim Leitão surge com um drama de fé, luxúria e juventude que parece vindo de outro mundo. Mas é nosso, português até à medula, e ainda bem. Joaquim de Almeida é

1

23 Jun 2025, 20:04 UTC386 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Tentação [1997] #Drama #Romance #CinemaPortuguês ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️★★★ (7/10) 🙏 Quando o Amor Bate à Porta… Mesmo que Seja a do Seminário

22 Jun 2025, 11:46 UTC337 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎥Predador: Da Selva à Agenda, Uma Caçada com Altos e Baixos Das selvas às cidades, o Predador caça... e nem sempre acerta. Um ícone que arrecadou 98 milhões em 1987 e moldou a ficção científica musculada, a saga oscila entre o sublime e o risível. 🔥 Predador (1987): "Se sangra, pode ser morto." O original. Lendário. Arnold Schwarzenegger, no pico da testosterona, lidera brutamontes saídos de um pesadelo de Hollywood

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ocinefilia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 121,687 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝕆 ℂ𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕗𝕚𝕝𝕚𝕒” (@ocinefilia), 817 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ocinefilia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.