Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Оккультизм древних истоков

Channel

Оккультизм древних истоков

@occudemonation

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,595subscribers

-410 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001617428208
TypeChannel
Username@occudemonation
Created7 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/occudemonation

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,5956,0055,8007 August 2026 — 6,005 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,005 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,002 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,975 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,811 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,726 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,712 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,846 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,808 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,785 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,752 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,701 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,675 subscribers17 September 2026 — 5,643 subscribers25 September 2026 — 5,694 subscribers4 October 2026 — 5,628 subscribers10 October 2026 — 5,595 subscribers7 August 202610 October 2026
17 measurements spanning 64 days, net -410. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,534–6,067 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Oct 2026, 20:395,595-33
4 Oct 2026, 23:565,628-66
25 Sept 2026, 20:365,694+51
17 Sept 2026, 09:425,643-32
13 Sept 2026, 15:185,675-26
4 Sept 2026, 23:585,701-51
1 Sept 2026, 05:065,752-33
28 Aug 2026, 18:545,785-23
26 Aug 2026, 01:555,808-38
23 Aug 2026, 07:355,846+134
19 Aug 2026, 11:075,712-14
16 Aug 2026, 19:135,726-85
13 Aug 2026, 05:455,811-164
10 Aug 2026, 12:275,975-27
7 Aug 2026, 23:146,002-3
7 Aug 2026, 09:306,005no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:296,005first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

721 reactions across 22 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤33546.5%
custom 537325060553389613414420.0%
💋12417.2%
🙏9813.6%
🔥131.80%
✍60.832%
⚡10.139%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 721 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @occudemonation. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC115 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я считаю, что ни один блядский человек не может судить кто существует, а кто нет. По одной причине - как вы докажите существования духа и как докажите отсуствие? По собственным меркам? Ну такое себе Ну типо six-seven, как вы это делаете, дорогие мои?

💋12❤6custom 53732506055338961344

11 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC120 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Записываем ✍️ - С духами нельзя работать, ибо они трансцендентны (но при этом почему-то весь оккульт ориентируется на труды прошлых практиков, которые получены через иррациональное) - Духи не выходят на связь, потому что их придумали люди - Получать информацию от них нельзя, потому что потому, я так решила

❤12💋5custom 53732506055338961345

11 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC125 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Если хотите знать моё мнение, то в оккультизме я не полагаюсь сугубо на науку - это невозможно. В магии всегда будут антинаучные тейки. Ибо это во многом иррациональная работа, но также я хочу вас успокоить: даже в науке существует иррационализм Вот моя мысль: Иррациональное выходит за пределы человеческого, но некоторой своей частью люди всё же способны объять то, к чему прикоснулись. И к этому хочется добавить е…

❤13✍6custom 53732506055338961345🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC326 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вера в то, что бог любит всех - это чисто человеческий нарциссизм. В реальности древнего мира богам не было дело до всех, внимание нужно было еще выдержать, и чаще всего оно разрушало человека, а не спасало. Не приближайся к огню, если не готов сгореть (вавилонская притча) Сам факт принесения жертвы или молитвы ничего не гарантировал. Человек мог выскрести последнее, прийти в храм, а бог просто игнорировал его или …

💋24❤14custom 537325060553389613413

8 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC307 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Меня в целом заебало отношение людей к богам, как к хорошиксам, которые хотят только лучшего для них. Они свободная воля, могут как отнять, так и даровать. Так было, есть и будет всегда. Они не наделены только «хорошим» или только плохим. Иштар не любит и не принимает всех, кто к ней обратился. С чего бы какому-то богу любить всех тех, кто к ним обращается. В древнем шумере само обращение к богу - это не гарантия лю…

❤23💋12custom 537325060553389613410

6 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC333 views42 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Наконец-то могу хвастаться не сексуальными заслугами, а боевыми (первый бой со счётом 4:1 в мою пользу)

❤25💋9custom 53732506055338961348

6 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC342 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ну хоть бы не спорил с соломенным чучелом, а спросил бы у меня: «Вита, ты веришь в это сейчас?»

❤16💋6custom 53732506055338961346

6 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC334 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Тут вопрос не в возрасте, а в том, что многоуважаемый человек снова сменяет акцент с моих слов на моё прошлое, на прошлые посты. Я могу сказать, что многие свои тезисы я готова переспорить и сделать разоблачение на саму себя, где и кто соснул хуйца. И в данном случае это тема, связанная с браком Иштар и Яхве. Моя истинная позиция сейчас: Иштар НЕ жена Яхве. Пытаться скрестить вавилонскую Иштар с Яхве неуместно. Если…

❤16💋8custom 53732506055338961346

5 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC323 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А я знаю о чём написать пост ⬇️ В каждой эпохе оккультизма повторяется один и тот же сценарий: появляется человек, которому тесно в рамках старых гримуаров, он создает новую систему (свои сигилы, свои имена духов, свою метафизику), получает волну хейта от консерваторов, а спустя полвека его наработки становятся «незыблемой классикой» Что-то мне это напоминает))) но, хорошо, давайте опираться на примеры, для меня ув…

❤18custom 537325060553389613410💋8

5 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC285 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

О чём бы вам написать пост..

🙏19❤9custom 53732506055338961348

4 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC337 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

Те самые сплетни с филологом:

❤14🙏5custom 53732506055338961345

4 Aug 2026, 06:55 UTC385 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я обожаю, когда люди подменяют исторические факты под философию определенных людей. Это же так разумно. Автор, видео которого мне скинули утверждает, что жрецов мужчин у Афродиты не было: «Мужчина не способен понять и объять Афродиту из-за солярного патриархального сознания» А то что жрецы мужчины у Афродиты в античности были обычным явлением - это мы будем игнорировать. Опять таки, как думали древние греки: у них…

❤19🙏9custom 53732506055338961348

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @occudemonation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@occudemonation edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

TAROGODDESS🕯️🎀
@tarogoddess · 30,339
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 8 September 2026
Inquizitor Library. Книги по магии и эзотерике.
@Inquizitor_Library · 42,700
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Оккультизм древних истоков” (@occudemonation), 5,595 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/occudemonation.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.