Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Объём Медиа

Channel

Объём Медиа

@obyemmedia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,750subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001800871291
TypeChannel
Username@obyemmedia
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/obyemmedia

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,7503,8003,7756 August 2026 — 3,778 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,778 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,790 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,800 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,794 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,790 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,792 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,781 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,775 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,769 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,774 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,768 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,763 subscribers18 September 2026 — 3,774 subscribers27 September 2026 — 3,750 subscribers6 August 202627 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 52 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,743–3,808 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 11:373,750-24
18 Sept 2026, 13:573,774+11
13 Sept 2026, 20:593,763-5
9 Sept 2026, 17:223,768-6
4 Sept 2026, 08:203,774+5
31 Aug 2026, 12:443,769-6
28 Aug 2026, 12:343,775-6
25 Aug 2026, 03:463,781-11
22 Aug 2026, 02:143,792+2
18 Aug 2026, 10:223,790-4
15 Aug 2026, 19:373,794-6
12 Aug 2026, 08:123,800+10
9 Aug 2026, 03:533,790+12
6 Aug 2026, 04:313,778no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:333,778first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

154 reactions across 3 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8756.5%
❤3824.7%
custom 5319204536672345992159.74%
👍117.14%
🍾31.95%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 3 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @obyemmedia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 3 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC≈4,850 views98 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Это не Макс, а PRO MAX. Наш Максим Поляков добежал 2026 километров от Москвы до Сочи. Ещё раз: 2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣6️⃣км. ➡️ Месяц в пути. ➡️ 27000 метров набора высоты. ➡️ 65-67 км в день. ➡️ Ежедневный бег с 8:00 до 17:00. ➡️ >5 млн рублей на благотворительность собрано благодаря вниманию к такому челленджу. Говорит, не было ни одной мысли сойти. Плавно и чётко выполнял задуманное и с каждым километром смещал границы того…

🔥67❤20👍11

3 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC798 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Жан-Мишель Баския любил спорт, особенно бокс. Несколько его самых узнаваемых работ — портреты спортсменов. 🥊 «Famous Negro Athletes» (1981). Работа язвительно указывала на то, что темнокожие знаменитости в Америке существовали только в спорте, а не в культуре и искусстве. 🥊 «St. Joe Louis Surrounded by Snakes» (1982). Боксёр Джо Луис показан как мученик и герой. Нимб подчеркивает его статус и чистоту на фоне оскале…

❤10🔥1custom 53192045366723459921

1 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC871 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пофантазировали в очередной раз на тему спорта для ваших заставок. Напишите, какого вида спорта вам не хватает. Бокс? Йога? Может пилатес? Подумаем к следующему месяцу, чем вас вдохновить на занятия 💧 В хорошем качестве скачивайте из комментариев.

🔥19custom 531920453667234599214❤8🍾3

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @obyemmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Журнал «Марафонец»
@marathonecmagazine · 41,345
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
Бегать просто
@runforhealth · 138,674
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
Беговое сообщество
@runc_run · 61,640
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
Голый спорт
@fyiwdwytm · 20,432
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 September 2026
Across the Runiverse
@across_the_runiverse · 26,041
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026
Московский Марафон
@moscow_marathon · 26,671
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
Russia Running
@russiarunninglife · 35,312
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
WILD TRAIL
@wildwildfamily · 21,003
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 September 2026
sektaschool
@sektaschool · 20,629
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 September 2026
Tukituk tut 😉
@netukituk · 34,365
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 2 September 2026
Sewera: про жизнь за городом
@sewerachannel · 20,102
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 September 2026
Running Heroes Russia
@wearegrut · 23,253
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Объём Медиа” (@obyemmedia), 3,750 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/obyemmedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.