Channel
@observers_com
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
689subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001713112027 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @observers_com |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/observers_com |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 689 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 692 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 693 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 701 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 701 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
67 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦄 | 25 | 37.3% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 29.9% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 20.9% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 4.48% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.99% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.49% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2025 to 13 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Friday the 13th in the crypto world: A user on CoW Swap mistakenly accepts a $50M USDT → AAVE trade at a rate that results in a loss of more than $45M. An MEV bot detects the transaction and pays a $35M bribe to Ethereum block builder Titan Builder to front-run the trade, earning about $10M for its developer. Titan Builder then pays a $1.2M bribe to an Ethereum validator to include the block, pockets the remaining…
🔥2💘1
Just a beautiful number today: the 20 millionth Bitcoin has been mined. Only 1 million remain.
🔥2👍1🦄1
Reputation Is Not Static. In Can Be Shorted On Ethos Ethos turns credibility into an on-chain market. By blending XP-based participation, capital-backed vouching, and invite-bonded trust graphs, it attempts to price reputation itself. One year in, the experiment reveals both the promise—and the fragility—of financializing trust in crypto Read on Observers.com
👍2🔥2🦄1
Field Notes..👀 • Uniswap Foundation outlines seven AI agent “skills” describing how autonomous agents could operate on the Uniswap trading platform. • BGD Labs, a major contributor to Aave, leaves. • Tether discontinues its offshore yuan-pegged stablecoin CNH₮. Which topic should we explore in depth? Vote in the comments.
🦄2👍1
Field Notes..👀 • Aptos tokenomics cuts: staking APR from 5.19% to 2.6%, increases gas fees 10× • Ethereum outlines its 2026 upgrade priorities. • Polymarket acquires Dome, a startup building a unified API for prediction markets. Which topic should we explore in depth? Vote in the comments.
👍1🦄1
How US Equity Is Being Woven Into the Blockchain Mesh After years of legal uncertainty, U.S. regulators have opened the door for on-chain shareholder records. From Galaxy and Securitize to DTC’s pilot, equity is moving into the blockchain mesh—reshaping settlement, trading, and the future architecture of capital markets. Read on Observers.com
❤1👍1🦄1
Andre Cronje’s Flying Tulip launches public token sale today. Will it have more luck than his Yearn Finance token? Observing. NFA
🦄2
Field Notes..👀 • Tomasz K. Stańczak steps down as co-executive director of the Ethereum Foundation. • Swedish H100 acquires Adam Back–backed Swiss Bitcoin treasury firm Future Holdings AG. • Buterin shares on X his thoughts on prediction markets. • BlackRock brings its Treasury-backed BUIDL token to Uniswap. Which topic should we explore in depth? Vote in the comments.
👍1🦄1
What Vitalik Buterin Wants To Change In Ethereum Vitalik Buterin’s recent posts reflect a shift from idealistic decentralization toward pragmatic system design. Rather than rejecting Ethereum’s core principles, he questions where complexity, governance, and the current development path fail under real-world constraints. Read on Observers.com
👍2🦄2
Banking and CBDC Roundup 31/01/2026 The digital euro is increasingly framed as a tool of EU sovereignty. China’s interest-bearing e-CNY shows no banking disruption so far. Tokenization goes mainstream as the ECB validates DLT collateral and the U.S. SEC distinguishes issuer-backed from wrapper tokens. Read on Observers.com
👍3🦄1
Bermuda’s Stablecoin Moment and Stablecoins' Bermuda Moment Bermuda is integrating USDC stablecoin into its economy. In a dollar-pegged island state, stablecoins aren’t replacing money—they’re upgrading the rails. If it works, dozens of “Other Bermudas” could emerge as the next growth engine for stablecoins. Read on Observers.com
👏2🦄1
Hyperliquid’s Vertical Evolution Hyperliquid is evolving from a perp DEX into a vertically integrated financial stack. By launching its own L1, native stablecoin, and spot markets, it prioritizes market fit over ideology. Started on Arbitrum, its roadmap reveals a larger ambition: to become the global base layer for all trading. Read on Observers.com
🔥3🦄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @observers_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,502,312 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Observers.com” (@observers_com), 689 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/observers_com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.