Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

objet petit a

@object_p_a

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

215subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003661883890
TypeChannel
Username@object_p_a
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/object_p_a

Growth

212215213.58 Aug 2026, 04:34 — 212 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:01 — 212 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 17:31 — 215 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:348 Aug 2026, 17:31
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 212–215 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 17:31215+3
8 Aug 2026, 11:01212no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:34212first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
67.6%
avg views ÷ 215 subscribers
Avg views / post
145
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (21 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,760
Reactions total101
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

101 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6463.4%
👍98.91%
💋76.93%
💯54.95%
🥰43.96%
😁32.97%
🍌21.98%
👏21.98%
🍓10.99%
💘10.99%
😎10.99%
😭10.99%
🤨10.99%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC66 viewsread 8 August 2026

это был последний пост про Алана Уэйка (хотя возможно еще будут посты про Алана Уэйка 2, но не уверен). думаю, что дальше сделаю фрейдо-лакановский разбор Control и фильма Чёрный лебедь. а пока накидайте в комменты варианты каких-то интересных штук для ревью. видео, фильмы, игры, вот это вот все.

6 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC73 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Departure, by Alan Wake (часть 3) первая часть: https://t.me/object_p_a/253 вторая часть: https://t.me/object_p_a/259 ну а что мистер Скрэтч? слишком интимное взаимодействие Алана с Вещью (Dark Presence) не могло пройти без следа: наслаждения становится так много, что оно выплескивается из Алана, субстанционализируясь в форме злого двойника-доппельгангера, — мистера Скрэтча. Алан оказывается расщеплен. а-а. вот в

3

4 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC108 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

великолепной сценой заканчивается 7 серия 3 сезона Дома дракона. если кто не смотрел, то знайте: дальше идут с п о й л е р ы. так что читайте на свой страх и риск. когда, казалось бы, Эйгону II пришёл конец (хотя я уверен, что все ожидали спасения в духе deus ex machina — но произошло спасение more like чеховское ружье), к нему на помощь приходит неожиданно восставший из мёртвых дракон Солнечный огонь. сцена прекра

5

3 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC110 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

мне нередко задают вопрос: почему же все-таки психоанализ? для этого существует лишь одна причина: потому что я никогда не хотел быть в роли господина для кого бы то ни было. когда вам говорят про норму, психологическое здоровье, адаптацию и прочее, обычно имеют в виду, что где-то в объективной реальности существует нормативный идеал, к которому специалист когнитивно-поведенческой, гуманистической, гештальт и иже с

11💋3🍌1

3 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC106 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

у аналитика нет желания — есть лишь НЕжелание: не быть господином. для этой цели он готов пожертвовать своей личностью — стать для анализанта буквально никем, баннерной тканью, пятном, молчаливой фигурой, нависающей над кушеткой, пока он ведет свои пространные монологи о всякой всячине. дело никогда не было в интерпретациях. дело никогда не было в понимании. задача аналитика лишь в том, чтобы оставаться для анализант

8👏2💋2🍌1

1 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC119 viewsread 8 August 2026

1) вчера прошёл Control. поворчу, НО лучше бы Сэм Лэйк, подобно своему кумиру Линчу, снимал кино или в крайнем случае рисовал визуальные новеллы. сюжет Control вполне бодрячком, но геймплей — казнь тысячью удушений. вы когда-нибудь прокрастинировали прохождение компьютерной игрушки? я два месяца растягивал игру на 20 часов геймплея. но сюжет мы по Лакану все равно разберем. 2) я просматриваю ленту тик-тока, но что-т

30 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC138 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

поздний Лакан, Лакан времен семинаров «Encore» и, собственно, «Sinthome», переосмысливает понятие симптома. если ранний Лакан понимает симптом как послание бессознательного, которое необходимо расшифровать, то более поздний — как узел, который связывает травму, субъективность и способ организации своего наслаждения. чтобы выделить это новое, радикально переосмысленное понятие симптома, Лакан использует старое француз

3💋2

30 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC134 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Departure, by Alan Wake (часть 2). для тех, кто пропустил, первая часть тут: https://t.me/object_p_a/253 ну а что Алан? Алан Уэйк за время повествования проходит путь значительных личностных трансформаций. на начало событий игры он — субъект почти с обнуленной либидинальной экономикой, к концу — инкарнация чистого желания, второе пришествие Антигоны. он заигрывает со смертью, приближаясь к последней черте, за кото

3

28 Jul 2026, 20:26 UTC137 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«письмо всегда достигает своего адресата» идеально дополняет концепцию интерпелляции по Альтюссеру. об этом был мой недавний ролик («эй ты, тебя только что интерпеллировали»). что по сути говорит Альтюссер: когда ты оборачиваешься на полицейское «эй, ты», ты возлагаешь на себя весь тот груз правил и ответственности, которые полагаются тебе как субъекту идеологии. полицейский выступает как рупор идеологического Больш

6

24 Jul 2026, 10:08 UTC179 viewsread 8 August 2026

спрашивали в комментах про Диско Элизиум, но анализ уже есть! вот, держите

24 Jul 2026, 10:08 UTC199 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://telegra.ph/Disko-EHlizium--strogo-frejdo-lakanovskoe-proizvedenie-I-vot-pochemu-04-30 готовы вы или нет — 12 страниц фрейдо-лакановского анализа Диско Элизиума ждут вас на ваших экранах.

🥰4🍓1💘1😎1😭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @object_p_a. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,053,729 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“objet petit a” (@object_p_a), 215 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/object_p_a.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.