Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🔥OB分销社|共同富裕|OB Team 🉐💰

Channel

🔥OB分销社|共同富裕|OB Team 🉐💰

@obcff

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

193subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002168075860
TypeChannel
Username@obcff
Created10 April 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/obcff

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

192195193.57 August 2026 — 194 subscribers8 August 2026 — 194 subscribers31 August 2026 — 195 subscribers10 September 2026 — 192 subscribers18 September 2026 — 193 subscribers1937 August 202618 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 42 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 192–195 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:40193+1
10 Sept 2026, 06:55192-3
31 Aug 2026, 08:05195+1
8 Aug 2026, 11:47194no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:01194first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 10 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤10100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2025 to 17 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jun 2025, 21:43 UTC≈5,680 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚀 OB分销计划正式上线! 想躺赚?想轻松日入四位数?现在就加入 OnlyBee 分销计划! 🐝 OnlyBee 是什么? 专注高质量 GV 内容,稳定运营 4 年,拥有超百万粉丝,会员口碑超赞,人人都爱! 💰 怎么赚? ✅ 在商店右下角点击「邀请返利」 ✅ 获取你的专属链接 ✅ 发布到 Twitter / Telegram ✅ 粉丝通过你的链接付费入会,你就坐收高额分成! 🔥 没有粉丝?也不怕! 直接 @ OnlyBee 所有推号,官方帮你转发引流,轻松涨粉,还能赚到钱! 💸 分成有多高? ✨ 普通分销:最低 25% ✨ 原创作者:最低 40% ✨ 无上限提成,赚多少你说了算! 📞 了解更多 👉 联系客服 @OBDJJ ⭐️ 立即加入 OB分销计划,把收益拉满!

❤10

Signed QI YANG

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @obcff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔥OB分销社|共同富裕|OB Team 🉐💰” (@obcff), 193 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/obcff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.