Channel
@obcff
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
194subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002168075860 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @obcff |
| Description | 📢 OnlyBee分销频道｜兼职全职、共同富裕 加入计划=免费推广工具 + 官方转推 + 运营指导=0成本赚收益！ Obcaff — Join, Promote & Earn with OnlyBee Club! |
| Created | 10 April 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/obcff |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 194 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 194 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 10 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
10 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2025 to 17 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 OB分销计划正式上线！ 想躺赚？想轻松日入四位数？现在就加入 OnlyBee 分销计划！ 🐝 OnlyBee 是什么？ 专注高质量 GV 内容，稳定运营 4 年，拥有超百万粉丝，会员口碑超赞，人人都爱！ 💰 怎么赚？ ✅ 在商店右下角点击「邀请返利」 ✅ 获取你的专属链接 ✅ 发布到 Twitter / Telegram ✅ 粉丝通过你的链接付费入会，你就坐收高额分成！ 🔥 没有粉丝？也不怕！ 直接 @ OnlyBee 所有推号，官方帮你转发引流，轻松涨粉，还能赚到钱！ 💸 分成有多高？ ✨ 普通分销：最低 25% ✨ 原创作者：最低 40% ✨ 无上限提成，赚多少你说了算！ 📞 了解更多 👉 联系客服 @OBDJJ ⭐️ 立即加入 OB分销计划，把收益拉满！
❤10
Signed QI YANG
Channel name was changed to «🔥OnlyBee 分销社｜OB Team 🉐💰»
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @obcff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 899,357 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔥OB分销社｜共同富裕｜OB Team 🉐💰” (@obcff), 194 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/obcff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.