Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Obamka PvZ and more...

Channel

Obamka PvZ and more...

@obamkavponamkego

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

124subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003927819454
TypeChannel
Username@obamkavponamkego
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 1 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/obamkavponamkego

Growth

1231251249 August 2026 — 123 subscribers10 August 2026 — 123 subscribers25 August 2026 — 124 subscribers1 September 2026 — 125 subscribers11 September 2026 — 123 subscribers18 September 2026 — 124 subscribers9 August 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 40 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 123–125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:38124+1
11 Sept 2026, 03:16123-2
1 Sept 2026, 14:14125+1
25 Aug 2026, 19:54124+1
10 Aug 2026, 16:23123no change
9 Aug 2026, 19:16123first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1843.9%
👍1024.4%
❤614.6%
✍24.88%
🎉24.88%
🤔24.88%
🙏12.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC62 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Не ну,в отличии от первого чф этот мне почему то было смотреть намного интереснее,получается мои предикты проебались уже на второй битве,хех,не ну джониус и соавторы молодцы,у сбирки есть потенциал,буду болеть за то чтобы виктория в пф вышла т.к она проебала прямой урон,ну и в общем то все

👍5

Signed Обамка

7 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC70 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤1

Signed 𝓕𝓮𝓭𝓸𝓡

4 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC108 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Го 20 добьем чтоб второй оценил

🔥9🙏1

Signed Обамка

4 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC109 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Нихуя он блять

❤1

Signed Обамка

4 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC80 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ocenkakomand

Оценю хуй обамки, если наберётся 10 огоньков

Signed Обамка

4 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC71 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ocenkakomandPhoto

Отбор на чемп Оценок Команд. Мест 20. Один день идёт) Надо обязательно подписаться на два моих канала: @ocenkakomand @okak228000

Signed Обамка

4 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC103 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed 𝓕𝓮𝓭𝓸𝓡

4 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC110 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤1

Signed Обамка

2 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC62 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @slooooon888

А вот и что-то страшное... 🤩АНОНС🤩 В ближайшее время начнётся отбор на чемпионат, в котором будет целых 100 участников. В чемпионате будут как обычные ванильные растения, так и гибридные. Отбор будет проведён именно здесь, так что зовите друзей и ждите дальнейшей информации.

❤2👍1

Signed Обамка

2 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC101 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Крч,тупо будет делать это в закрытую,мне михмих напомнил про мое желание родить рпг когда то,вот мы будем потихоньку его пилить,если у кого есть желание помочь отпищите в лс,хз справимся ли мы вдвоем,в любом случае на рпг потребуется столько времени сколько потребуется

👍3

Signed Обамка

2 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC88 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Хз нахуй я сюда это кидаю,но наши на кубаче,это победа

🎉2

Signed Обамка

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @obamkavponamkego. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTCAnonymous Poll38 voters

Вот вы как потребляди че хотите от типа с мелким тгк которому делать нехуй?

  1. Чемп,хоть без видео на отъебись39%
  2. Чемп но качественны чтобы смотреть приятно было66%
  3. Чего то оригиналбного,мб даже координально нового58%
  4. Просто разбавочных но по своему вайбовых постов хватит47%
  5. Да поебать мне удаляй канал(это кст не рофл варик,могу реально удалить)16%

The shares total 226%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Obamka PvZ and more...” (@obamkavponamkego), 124 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/obamkavponamkego.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.