Channel
@ob_serdcem
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
601subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002141177308 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ob_serdcem |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ob_serdcem |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 601 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 602 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 602 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (24 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 844 |
| Reactions total | 82 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
82 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 54 | 65.9% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 24.4% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 4.88% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.44% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мода хоровода в лицах Shood в переводе с удмуртского означает «Счастье». Для бренда это счастье быть собой, принимать свою уникальность и видеть красоту в многообразии. Shood создаёт этно-эклектику народов мира в современном прочтении и одежду для людей любого роста и параметров. На показе «Мода хоровода» коллекцию представили: • Цзя Жуньтянь — студентка Школы дизайна НИУ ВШЭ («Экранные искусства», КНР). • Максим…
❤4
С чего начинается федеральный масштаб? С мечты и искренней истории одной мамы. Когда-то мы были небольшим АНО в одном регионе. Перелом случился, когда мы открыли «Дневники». Реальные истории мам и пап особенных детей. Вот прямая цитата автора идеи Руфины Осиповой: «Я видела, как родители, воспитывающие детей с особенностями, словно живут за невидимой стеной. Они остаются наедине со своими эмоциями, и от этого один…
❤4🔥1🙏1
HOROVOD mobile Вчера о нашем проекте благотворительной сотовой связи сообщили ведущие СМИ страны. «В России появился новый механизм регулярной поддержки благотворительных проектов, основанный на использовании привычных цифровых сервисов»,- сообщило РИА Новости «Инклюзивное волонтёрское движение «Обнимаю сердцем» и Билайн запустили ХОРОВОД Мобайл – первую в России благотворительную брендированную связь»,- написали в …
🔥5🤩4
🟡ХОРОВОД Мобайл — первый в России проект брендированной мобильной связи благотворительной организации. Он запущен на базе платформы Smart MVNO (умный виртуальный мобильный оператор) от Билайна. Он станет частью экосистемы АНО «Обнимаю сердцем», объединяющей семьи, детей и взрослых с инвалидностью, волонтёров, бизнес, образовательные учреждения и культурные площадки вокруг практик естественной инклюзии. Абонент полу…
🔥6❤1👍1
Из глубин завораживающего Забайкалья, от дизайнера Инны Анпилоговой, бренд INNA STYLE -откровение для женщин новой эры — смелых, многогранных, жаждущих сиять и на деловых встречах, и в вихре ярких событий. Одежда бренда как пленительный коктейль из чистой нежности, хулиганской дерзости и утонченной лаконичности, дарующий безупречную уверенность. Коллекция «Благодарность прошлому», блиставшая на ВЭФ-2025, это живописн…
❤10
В связи с высказываниями #мэьэйбоотур хотим высказать, что мы все равны! Прошлогодний флешмоб, который доказывает, что Ценность Личности абсолютна и не зависит от физических или ментальных особенностей. Диагноз — это лишь факт биографии, а не мера человечности.
🔥7
Сегодняшняя ситуация с благотворительностью в России выглядит довольно парадоксально. С одной стороны, люди в целом готовы помогать: по данным ВЦИОМ около 70% россиян хотя бы раз участвовали в благотворительности. С другой – регулярно это делают уже заметно меньше, менее 30%. Получается довольно очевидный разрыв: желание есть, но до действия оно часто не доходит. Люди не против благотворительности – они просто не вкл…
❤7
Команда МЕТИЗ приехала в ООО «ОРТОМЕД+» в Якутск, чтобы провести семинар по настройке протезных модулей. Протезисты изучили тонкости калибровки гидравлики, настройки углепластиковых стоп и работы с бионическими кистями. А пользователи получили уникальную возможность — походить на разных модулях. Сравнить, почувствовать, выбрать то, что подходит именно им. Алексей Казаков, ключевой менеджер по продажам МЕТИЗ: «Когд…
❤3
Мода хоровода в лицах… GVALT — авторский бренд одежды, работающий на стыке архитектурной чёткости и чувственного взгляда на моду. Философия бренда — современная мужественность без агрессии и чувственность без стереотипов. Здесь одежда становится продолжением личности, помогая раскрывать внутреннюю силу и индивидуальность. На показе «Мода хоровода» бренд представил коллекцию «Оригами» — историю о свободе, переменах …
❤4👍1👏1🔥1
Движение «Обнимаю сердцем» (Республика Саха (Якутия)) Основатель проекта – Анна Федорова. «Обнимаю сердцем» – движение, которое с 2022 года развивает культуру инклюзии через творчество, просвещение и совместные проекты людей с инвалидностью и без нее. В 2025 году присоединилась к проекту #ОткрытоДляВсех. ➡️ 200+ мероприятий, в том числе самый масштабный в России инклюзивный показ адаптивной моды ➡️ 2000+ волонтер…
❤8
Спасибо Агенству стратегических инициатив за поддержку и помощь в развитии ❤️
Для пользователей протезов отличная новость от наших друзей
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ob_serdcem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 270,881 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Обнимаю сердцем❤️” (@ob_serdcem), 601 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ob_serdcem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.