2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20–22 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 14:47
21
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:07
21
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 12 December 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
20
Links
11
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2,691 reactions across 6 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤩
400
14.9%
🥰
396
14.7%
🔥
390
14.5%
👍
389
14.5%
👏
388
14.4%
❤
364
13.5%
🎉
342
12.7%
🤔
4
0.149%
👻
3
0.111%
🏆
2
0.074%
😴
2
0.074%
🙏
2
0.074%
🤯
2
0.074%
👀
1
0.037%
💋
1
0.037%
😱
1
0.037%
🤓
1
0.037%
🤡
1
0.037%
🤮
1
0.037%
🥴
1
0.037%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,691reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2022 to 26 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
DB多宝游戏品牌精神『 Do The Best, Double The Fun卓越出色，乐趣倍增』，致力打造业界前瞻游戏，专精体育、真人、电竞、棋牌、彩票与电子领域。以专业、安全和卓越的服务赢得世界各地用户的信任。
世界级的线上娱乐产业领导厂商以『顶尖开发、智能可靠、沉浸体验、亚洲独创』为方针，在现有强大实力的基础上持续投入产品创新升级和市场开发，提供能满足不同区域客户不断改变的线上娱乐需求的产品解决方案，引领全球线上休闲产业的蓬勃发展。
（9）资源介绍：可以详细介绍资源优势、优惠政策等方面详细内容
顶尖开发团队：DB拥有一支卓越的开发团队，具备丰富的行业经验，专精体育、真人、电竞、棋牌、彩票与电子领域，致力于不断创新和提高产品质量。这确保DB游戏在市场上一直保持领先地位。
智能可靠技术：采用先进的技术和安全措施，以保障客户的数据和财务安全。平台稳定可靠，保证客户能够畅快游玩，无后顾之忧。
沉浸式体验：重视用户体验，通…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ob1689. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 507,490 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ob1689 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ky159 named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OB游戏API供应商” (@ob1689), 21 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ob1689.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
